VIDEO The CIA Vs. The Presidency: This Is Not The First Time – Some Spies Playing ‘Very Dangerous Game’ to Hurt Trump

The CIA Vs. The Presidency: This Is Not The First Time

Feb 22, 2017 by Jon Rappoport

 

In 1947, the president of the United States, Harry Truman, decided: I’m going to create a snake and call it the CIA. Its watchword will be secrecy. It will collect secrets of our enemies and hold them secret and report the secrets to the president, who will decide what to do. Of course, the snake will remain under the president’s control. Its entire personality will be based on deception, but it will remain loyal to the president. No problem. Sure.

I’m thankful for Charles Hollander’s challenging piece on Thomas Pynchon’s novel, The Crying of Lot 49: “Pynchon, JFK and the CIA: Magic Eye Views of The Crying of Lot 49.”

Hollander offers vital reminders of the war between two parts of the Executive Branch: the presidency and the CIA.

“Implicit in Pynchon’s fiction is the view that events in recent American history have led to a virtual constitutional crisis, a challenge to the supremacy of the presidency by the intelligence community.”

“When Eisenhower made his ‘open skies’ proposal, in July 21, 1955, at a Geneva summit conference, calling for unrestricted but monitored overflight of national territories on both sides of the Iron Curtain, many observers felts its acceptance would have gone a long way toward thawing the Cold War. To make a gesture of good faith toward Soviet Premier Khrushchev, the president ordered the CIA (under Allen Dulles) to halt its U–2 photo–reconnaissance flights. But Dulles secretly arranged for the flights to continue. When Francis Gary Powers’s U–2 spy plane was shot down in the Ural mountains on May 1, 1960, and Khrushchev announced the facts to the world media, the embarrassed Eisenhower lied to cover up. To many it appeared that the CIA chief had disobeyed a direct order from the Commander–in–Chief. The St. Louis Post–Dispatch asked the next day, ‘Do our intelligence operatives enjoy so much freewheeling authority that they can touch off an incident of grave international import by low–level decisions unchecked by responsible policy–making power’?”

“Later, when Lee Harvey Oswald’s possible role in the U–2 affair became known, some observers felt Dulles’s action implied that the director of the CIA was above the president and that the military–industrial complex could do what it pleased, independent of the will of the people as expressed by the popularly elected and duly constituted chief executive. No wonder Ike [Eisenhower] was peeved: the CIA was running the U.S. the way it ran Latin America. The U–2 affair was no mere personality squabble, Ike vs. Dulles; it was two institutions of the executive branch vying for supremacy, the presidency vs. the CIA, hence the democratic process vs. a form of totalitarism.”

“The CIA had already planned the April 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion before Kennedy took office in January, and when the invasion failed, Kennedy felt that the CIA had set him up. He let it be known he intended to dismantle the CIA and assign its functions to the other intelligence units within the government. He reportedly vowed ‘to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds’… Kennedy, a Democrat, forced the Republican Allen Dulles to resign, along with other senior CIA officers. But the CIA was too deeply involved just then in operations around the world to be disassembled. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, in a way that implicated the CIA…critics of the Warren Commission Report, maybe even J. Edgar Hoover—believed the CIA had some hand in Kennedy’s assassination and the coverup. If it had, the CIA was again demonstrating that the presidency was subordinate to the CIA.”

“In a very short time, two presidents, a Republican and a Democrat, ran afoul of the CIA. The result amounted to a constitutional crisis, a change in our actual form of government without benefit of a duly ratified constitutional amendment. The crisis is reminiscent of that period in Roman history when the Praetorian Guard could sell the office of Emperor to the highest bidder and then, after a time, assassinate him and have a new auction. To this day, the president has never again challenged the CIA, though the agency has made its share of egregious errors. With the selection of former CIA director George H.W. Bush, the presidency and the CIA effectively merged…”

These days, President Trump is in his own war against the CIA and other parts of the intelligence community (IC).

In his case, he has overtly criticized the IC and called them disseminators of fake news and lies. He claims he’s putting an end to foreign wars of conquest. He’s already canceled a major Globalist trade treaty, the TPP.

But the IC believes it owns the Presidency and sets his agenda.

This is not a recent assumption. It goes all the way back to the early days of the CIA; Eisenhower, Kennedy.

In 2016, the IC leadership decided Trump would be a threat to their power, so they leaked/invented information about the Russians influencing the election on behalf of Trump. This effort was aimed at corroding his right to claim that he was the legitimate president.

The war continues.

The IC doesn’t want presidents with independent ideas.

They’re the bosses, and they intend to keep it that way.

—The snake slithers in the sun and the shade. It moves deftly and collects information and decides what to do with it. It compiles its own private list of enemies and allies. It senses its own power. Why should it honor its mandate? There is an Empire to be gained.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/cia-vs-presidency-not-first-time.html


Former CIA Agent: Some Spies Playing ‘Very Dangerous Game’ to Hurt Trump

Feb 22, 2017

Former CIA officer Bryan Dean Wright said Wednesday on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” that some of the rumors swirling about intelligence operatives withholding information and trying to discredit President Trump are true.

“Some folks are holding information back,” he said, calling the situation “deeply troubling.”

Wright, a Democrat who did not support Trump’s candidacy, said all spies should respect the president and that “the vast majority” execute their work faithfully to that end.

“There are a fair amount of these folks who are engaging in this very, very dangerous game,” Wright said, adding that he supports the president’s efforts to identify them and “throw them in jail.”

When such officers withhold information or try to undermine a sitting president, they put their finger on who wins and loses in the political world, Wright said. “When we see this garbage we’re in deep deep trouble.”

“When we see this garbage, we’re in deep deep trouble.”

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/02/22/former-cia-agent-tucker-intelligence-community-withholding-information-trump


Senators CIA 1955

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Veteran facing prison for 6-inch U.S. flag on fence

 

flag

A government watchdog in Washington is wondering whether President Trump’s new attorney general, Jeff Sessions, will continue to allow taxpayer money to be wasted on prosecution of a veteran for putting two small American flags on a fence at a Veterans Administration facility.

The case brought by the Obama administration is over a pair of “four-by-six-inch American flags,” explains Judicial Watch.

They were placed on a fence that is part of the “Great Lawn Gate” marking the entrance to the Los Angeles National Veterans Park on Memorial Day in 2016.

“Will Jeff Sessions’ Department of Justice (DOJ) continue wasting taxpayer dollars to criminally prosecute a 74-year-old U.S. Army veteran for posting two American flags in a southern California Veterans Administration facility?” Judicial Watch asked Tuesday.

“The absurd case was initiated under President Obama, but is set to go to trial in federal court next month under new DOJ leadership. The military veteran faces up to six months in jail for the ghastly offense of affixing Old Glory at a site honoring those who served their country.”

What do YOU think? Sound off on the veteran facing jail time for posting tiny flags

Judicial Watch said it was unable to obtain a response from Sessions’ office, nor did the DOJ press office respond to an inquiry from WND.

The veteran, Robert Rosebrock, posted the flag on the outside fence of a VA facility in West Los Angeles that is part of a larger 388-acre parcel that includes the Veterans Home of West Los Angeles.

Rosebrock served in the U.S. Army in the 1960s at the Schofield Barracks in Hawaii.

Judicial Watch said that since 2008, Rosebrock and a group of fellow veterans “have assembled at the gate weekly and on Memorial Day to protest the VA’s failure to make full use of the property to benefit veterans, particularly those who are homeless.”

The property was given to the government in the 1880s to care for disabled veterans. It now holds a veterans’ home, but it also is the site of the stadium for UCLA’s baseball team, laundry facilities, 20th Century Fox Television storage warehouses and soccer fields.

Rosebrock had been told that federal rules allowed the American flag to be posted on the fence, but the VA “later claimed that it erred in allowing the flags because it incorrectly interpreted the applicable regulation.”

The defendant was cited more than a dozen times, but the charges were dropped.

Until now.

He’s also facing charges for taking pictures in the area of the fence.

Rosebrock’s trial is scheduled for March 7 in a Los Angeles federal court before U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Judicial Watch and Los Angeles attorney Robert P. Sticht are representing Rosebrock.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/veteran-facing-prison-for-6-inch-u-s-flag-on-fence/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO George Washington’s Christianity – America’s Christian Founding Fathers

george-washington-god-nation
Feb 22, 2017 by 

George Washington’s Christianity

It was a critical point of the Constitutional Convention. With the windows closed, for secrecy, the delegates were enduring a sweltering Philadelphia summer in 1787. The question of how members of the proposed Congress would be chosen — by population, with larger states getting more representation, or by an equal vote of all states, regardless of size — appeared to be so intractable it threatened the survival of the convention.

And the country itself.

Then, 81-year-old Benjamin Franklin asked to speak, proposing that each session open with prayer. Recalling that they had done so during the late war for independence, Franklin said, “I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God Governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

What was particularly striking about these comments was not so much the sentiments — God governs in the affairs of men — but who said them. Franklin was perhaps the most worldly of the founding fathers, and his call was certainly not that of a deist — a person who believes God does not govern in the affairs of men.

Sitting a few feet away from Franklin, in the chair presiding over the convention, was George Washington of Virginia. There is absolutely no indication whatsoever that Washington would have disagreed with Franklin’s assertion — God governs in the affairs of men — and yet it is common to hear today by supposedly learned scholars that not only was Franklin a deist, the father of our country — George Washington — was a deist, as well.

The historical record indicates that Washington was a firm believer in Jesus Christ as the Second Person of the Trinity, and that Jesus had died for Washington’s sins, and rose from the dead three days later. A deist does not believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

At Washington’s tomb at Mount Vernon, a Bible verse graces the wall. Taken from the Gospel of John, it is a quotation of Jesus, when He sought to reassure Martha, the sister of Jesus’ dead friend Lazarus: “I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.”

Speaking less than one month following Washington’s death, Jonathan Mitchell Sewall told an audience in New Hampshire, “Let the deist reflect on this, and remember that Washington, the savior of his country, did not disdain to acknowledge and adore a great Savior, whom deists and infidels affect to slight and despise.”

John Marshall, the noted chief justice of the Supreme Court and a close friend of Washington’s, wrote a biography of Washington, in which he described him as a “sincere believer in the Christian faith.”

Washington clearly believed that God had given victory to the United States, believing the perseverance of his army was a “miracle.” In 1778, Washington said, “I am sure there never was a people who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those in the United States.”

Historian Jared Sparks published The Writings of George Washington in the 1830s, and wrote to Nelly Custis-Lewis, Washington’s granddaughter, inquiring as to the exact nature of Washington’s religious views. Nelly told Sparks that her grandmother, Martha Washington, herself a very devout Christian, had expressed shortly after his death the assurance that her late husband was now experiencing “happiness in Heaven.”

To those who would question her grandfather’s Christianity, she added, “Is it necessary that anyone should certify George Washington avowed himself to me a believer in Christianity? As well may we question his patriotism, his heroic, disinterested devotion to his country.”

Despite this powerful evidence that Washington was a Christian, there are skeptics. They argue that Washington would sometimes leave church before the communion. While this is true, it is also true that Washington did take communion, many times. One can only speculate as to why Washington did not always take communion. Perhaps he took the admonition of Paul, found in the first letter to the church at Corinth, in which the great apostle said that any person who ate the bread and drank the cup, unworthily, was guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. This was a fairly common view at the time, leading some Christians to skip communion, if they felt themselves “unworthy.”

So why do some insist that Washington was a deist, in the face of such overwhelming contrary evidence? Many, of course, just repeat what they have heard, and ignorance is their only excuse. But why are such falsehoods perpetrated by those who should really know better? Some simply want to tear down the “great man” of American history, and bring him down to their own level. After all, they reason, if the great Washington rejected biblical Christianity, it reinforces their inclination to follow suit.

After reading numerous letters Washington wrote to various person over the course of his life, the historian Jared Sparks concluded, “To say that he was not a Christian would be to impeach his sincerity and honesty. Of all men in the world, Washington was certainly the last whom any one would charge with dissimulation or indirectness; and if he was so scrupulous in avoiding even a shadow of these faults in every known act of his life, however unimportant, is it likely, is it credible, that in a matter of the highest and most serious importance he should practice through a long series of years a deliberate deception upon his friends and the public? It is neither credible nor possible.”

William Johnson, in his book George Washington, The Christian, notes that a book of prayers by Washington, in his own handwriting, was sold at auction in 1891. It is not known whether Washington composed the prayers himself, or simply copied them, but in one prayer, Washington asks God to pardon him of his sins, and “remove them from thy presence, as far as the east is from the west, and accept me for the merits of thy son, Jesus Christ, that when I come into thy temple and compass thine altar, my prayers may come before thee as incense.”

Perhaps the family of Washington felt comfortable in adding the words of Jesus, “I am the resurrection and the life” to the great man’s tomb, when one can read Washington’s own prayer wherein he speaks of Jesus Christ as one “who lay down in the grave and arose again for us, Jesus Christ our Lord, Amen.”

Indeed, while only God Himself knows the heart of every man, George Washington’s life gave every indication that he was a firm believer in Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.

This only adds to the greatness of the man, of whom it was said that he was “first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.”

 

Steve Byas is a professor of history at Randall University in Moore, Oklahoma, His book, History’s Greatest Libels, is a challenge to what he considers some of the greatest libels of history against such personalities as Christopher Columbus, Marie Antoinette, and Joseph McCarthy.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/25423-george-washington-s-christianity


America Founded on Christian Principles – Quotes from our Founding Fathers


AMERICA’S CHRISTIAN FOUNDING FATHERS

Nov 22, 2012

Most Americans have been conditioned to believe and to assume that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires a “wall of separation between Church and State.” This concept is seldom challenged today.

 

But it is not actually a part of the Constitution or any of the Amendments;
It did not exist until well into the twentieth century.

The establishment and free-exercise clauses of the First Amendment state: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

The meaning was crystal clear to Americans and American jurisprudence for generations.

Very simply, the federal government was prohibited from establishing a single national denomination above all others (a state religion—endowed with public funding, special privileges, and penalties on other faiths that reject its doctrines—as Great Britain had) and secondly, the federal government could not interfere with the individual’s right to freedom of worship.

The purpose of the First Amendment was not to protect Americans from religion, it was to protect religion from government intrusion. This “understanding” is in full and obvious accord with the raison d’etre of the Bill of Rights to limit the federal government’s power and thereby secure the freedom of individuals and the rights of the states. The Bill of Rights was a declaration of what the federal government could not do.

The intent of the First Amendment could never have been to separate church and state.
Virtually all state constitutions of that day required their elected officials to affirm belief in the Christian faith. Not one of the states would have ratified the First Amendment in violation of their constitutions had its purpose been to separate religious principles from public life.

Quotations from the framers of the Constitution and other leaders of early America illustrate this great principle.

George Washington as the first President said, “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports.”

And the second President, John Adams, said “It is Religion and Morality alone which can establish the principles under which Freedom can securely stand.”

Benjamin Franklin echoed Adams’ sentiment: “Only a virtuous people are capable of Freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.

On the same theme, Dr. Benjamin Rush, a Signer of the Declaration and a leading thinker of the period, said that, “The only foundation for a Republic is to be laid in Religion. Without this, there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty.”

And James Wilson, who signed the Declaration and the Constitution for Pennsylvania, pointed out that “Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other. The divine law, as discovered by reason and the moral sense, forms an essential part of both.”

Yes, it would have been impossible for these God-fearing men to have deliberately built a “Wall of Separation” between church and state. Here is how the phrase and eventually the concept of this “wall of separation” originated.

In 1801, the Danbury Baptist Association wrote a letter to President Thomas Jefferson. They were alarmed about a rumor. Was a national denomination soon to be established? Jefferson responded by letter on January 1, 1802, assuring them that there was no basis to the rumor. He said, “I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.”

The Danbury Baptists were apparently satisfied. They understood the “wall” to be one-directional, protecting them and other churches from possible discrimination and harm by means of a “governmental-favored denomination” status. Nevertheless, Jefferson’s eight-word phrase, “a wall of separation between Church and State,” has become the defining metaphor for today’s misinterpretation of the First Amendment.

Obviously, Jefferson’s letter and this phrase are not part of the First Amendment and it appears far-fetched legal “reasoning” to give it the force of law or to infer intent by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

America has achieved something remarkable in the history of nations: allowing religion to play a constructive role in the public square in a way that honors both faith and politics. It isn’t an easy balance to achieve, to say the least; and they have achieved it better than anyone. And so they don’t need ministers of any faith, including Christianity, attempting to undo what the framers created, with such great care and wisdom.

The Potters House Christian Fellowship
http://www.pottershouseauckland.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VIDEO Deep State, MB Obama Shadow Govt, Soft Coup, Cold Civil War, PizzaGate, Butyric Acid Threats Against Trump

shadow-govt-deep-state-usa

Feb 21, 2017

On Watch: Episode 7 – The ‘Soft Coup’ Continues


On Watch: Episode 8 – Welcome to the ‘Cold Civil War’


Jay Sekulow EVIDENCE Obama Set Up Coup Against Trump


Rush Limbaugh Podcast 2/15/17 | The Barack Obama Shadow Government Coup Against Trump


George Soros Anti Trump Group Arrested For Butyric Acid Threats Against President Donald Trump


The Men Who Knew Too Much About PizzaGate


Organizing for Action choreographs chaos at GOP town halls


Left-Wing Front Groups Make Anti-Trump Money Untraceable

‘Fiscal sponsors’ add layer of opacity to liberal dark money groups fighting Trump nominations

dark money cash

AP

Feb 22, 2017 BY:

Dark money advocacy groups are required to disclose little about their donors, but two left-wing organizations fighting President Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations are using a tax law loophole to make their finances even more opaque.

Allied Progress claimed credit on Wednesday for Andy Puzder’s withdrawal as Trump’s nominee for labor secretary. It has also battled Trump nominees to lead the Department of Commerce and the Treasury.

The group’s “Trump Transparency Project” is “dedicated to holding President-elect Donald Trump’s transition and eventual administration accountable for its economic appointments and policies that betray hardworking Americans,” its website says.

Allied Progress’s advocacy arm ran television ads explicitly opposing Puzder and Steve Mnuchin, who was confirmed last week to lead Treasury. It also released opposition research dossiers, organized Senate letter-writing campaigns, and launched websites to house its grassroots lobbying efforts.

OpposePuzder.org, the micro-site targeting the former Labor nominee, now redirects to a page opposing his replacement, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta.

The resources that Allied Progress and its advocacy arm are devoting to their anti-Trump efforts, as well as the sources of that money, are virtually unknowable due to the groups’ arrangements with two left-wing organizations that effectively hide their finances from public view.

Allied Progress is not technically a standalone organization. It is organized under the auspices of the New Venture Fund, a left-wing “fiscal sponsor” that handles legal compliance and logistics for Allied Progress and more than 100 other groups organized as tax-exempt 501(c)(3) charities.

Allied Progress Action, the advocacy arm that has been running television ads opposing Trump nominees, is part of a similar organization, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, that houses 501(c)(4) “social welfare” advocacy groups.

Neither Allied Progress nor its Action arm are required to disclose their donors. Mike Czin, an Allied Progress spokesman with the public relations firm SKDKnickerbocker, would not say who its financial supporters are.

While that is fairly standard for a political advocacy group, Allied Progress’ relationships with its fiscal sponsors provide an additional layer of opacity to its finances.

Generally donors to nonprofit groups can be ascertained from financial filings by the groups that donate to them. Charitable foundations and labor unions, for instance, are required to disclose grants and contributions to groups such as Allied Progress.

However, because the group is not a stand-alone organization but a “project of the New Venture Fund,” as its website notes, its donors can simply list the fiscal sponsor—NVF or Sixteen Thirty, as the case may be—rather than Allied Progress itself on their respective disclosures.

The arrangement makes it difficult to trace the donors financing Allied Progress’ anti-Trump advocacy.

Labor union disclosures show that unions donated $860,000 to the Sixteen Thirty Fund and about $134,000 to the New Venture Fund in 2015 and 2016. The unions were not required to (and did not) disclose which groups they were funding through donations to their fiscal sponsors.

The financial ambiguity that such arrangements create has recently drawn scrutiny for the ways in which it can mask the identities of donors to nonprofits involved in political or policy advocacy.

“The growth of anonymous giving is a big problem during a moment when philanthropy has become more politicized,” according to David Callahan, the founder and editor of online journal Inside Philanthropy.

“Intermediaries stand at the center of a new ‘shadow giving system’ that has made a full end-run around yesterday’s philanthropic reporting requirements,” Callahan wrote in a column last week.

The intermediary system can also help groups circumvent restrictions on the funds that nonprofits can spend on grassroots advocacy and lobbying activities, both of which are subject to strict thresholds under federal law.

Under a fiscal sponsorship agreement, it is the sponsor, not the specific groups that it houses, that is subject to those limitations. So an NVF-backed group, for instance, could theoretically devote all of its resources to lobbying, far exceeding federal limits on stand-alone 501(c)(3) groups, as long as other NVF-backed groups that conduct little or no such activity sufficiently offset that spending.

It is not clear what portion of Allied Progress’ time and resources go towards grassroots advocacy, in part because it is not required to independently file financial reports with the IRS that would detail that spending.

Czin would only say that the group “follows all relevant IRS guidelines that govern 501(c)(3) activity.”

He declined to provide details on the breakdown of the group’s activities, only noting that ads explicitly calling on senators to oppose Trump nominees were conducted by the group’s 501(c)(4) “Action” arm.

Neither NVF nor Sixteen Thirty responded to requests for comment on their relationships with Allied Progress.

Both groups are projects of Arabella Advisors, a private company that helps wealthy individuals and institutional funders manage large charitable giving portfolios. The two groups reported paying Arabella about $13.4 million for management consulting services in 2015, the latest year for which their annual tax filings are publicly available.

According to Callahan, the rise of “middlemen” such as NVF and Sixteen Thirty has steered large sums to groups that serve as financial pass-throughs, rather than actual sources of charitable giving.

“Middlemen are grabbing an ever-bigger slice of the wealth that is set aside for charity,” he wrote. Members of this “vast new industry of philanthropic consultants … look nothing like the beneficiaries of charitable giving that we normally think of.”

http://freebeacon.com/issues/left-wing-front-groups-make-anti-trump-money-untraceable/


rino-mccain-bomb

obama-protest

obama-little

Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

Image may contain: 4 people, people smiling, meme and text

Image may contain: outdoor

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, suit and text

Image may contain: text

Image may contain: 5 people, meme and text

Image may contain: 1 person, text

Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, meme and text

Image may contain: 2 people, meme and text

No automatic alt text available.

Image may contain: 4 people, meme and text

Image may contain: meme and text

Image may contain: text

Image may contain: outdoor

Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

Image may contain: 1 person, text

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO Terrorists Among Us: Rarely Mentioned Not-so-peaceful Refugees, Immigrants – Swedish Govt Cover up

The Terrorists Among Us: Rarely Mentioned Not-so-peaceful Refugees and Immigrants

Feb 21, 2017  by 

The Terrorists Among Us: Rarely Mentioned Not-so-peaceful Refugees and Immigrants

In the February 3 court hearing on President Trump’s executive order temporarily restricting admittance to the United States, Judge James Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington State claimed there had been zero terrorist attacks from the seven nations (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen) targeted by the executive order. Judge Robart asked Justice Department lawyer Michelle Bennett, “Have there been terrorist attacks in the United States by refugees or other immigrants from the seven countries listed, since 9/11?” When Bennett was unable to give Robart a response, he rephrased the question again, then stated, “Let me tell you. The answer to that is none, as best I can tell.”

Like many other public officials, journalists, and commentators, Judge Robart was repeating a false talking point that, having been endlessly repeated in the media, has become dogma with defenders of unrestricted migration and open borders. Many have erroneously taken Judge Robart’s claim to even more ridiculous heights, asserting the same claim not only for refugees and immigrants from the seven countries referred to in President Trump’s order, but claiming there have been no cases of terrorism committed by any refugees. We have listed below a fraction of the cases of terrorism and mass murder by Muslim immigrants from various countries, including those referred to in the executive order. In addition, there are many more Muslim refugees and immigrants who have been arrested and convicted of terrorism-related crimes, but who were apprehended and their plots foiled before they were carried out.

As we reported in our recent article “Trump’s ‘Muslim Ban’: Myths, Lies, and Censorship,” on February 11 the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) released the result of their extensive analysis of the government data obtained last fall by the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest. Contrary to the statements of the plaintiffs, the courts, and their media supporters, the CIS study shows that at least 72 terrorists were admitted to the United States from the seven dangerous countries. The countries and numbers are as follows:

• Somalia: 20
• Yemen: 19
• Iraq: 19
• Syria: 7
• Iran: 4
• Libya: 2
• Sudan: 1
Total: 72

Space and time allow us to provide here thumbnail sketches of only a few of the many examples that could be summoned to show the very real — and growing — danger that President Trump’s executive order was directed toward remedying.

Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the “Boston Marathon Bombers,” came to the United States from Kyrgyzstan as children with their family in 2002. The family entered the United States on a 90-day tourist visa and then applied for asylum, claiming a fear of deadly persecution if they returned to Kyrgystan. Dzhokhar became a naturalized U.S. citizen on September 11, 2012. The brothers planted bombs at the 2013 Boston Marathon, killing three people and injuring as many as 280 others. Tamerlan was killed in an ensuing gun battle with police. Following conviction on murder and terrorism charges, Dzhokhar was sentenced to death on May 15, 2015, and is currently a prisoner at the federal supermax prison, ADX Florence, in Colorado. According to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, he and his brother were radicalized through the Internet lectures of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born imam of Yemeni extraction, who was charged by the U.S. government with being a principal recruiter for al-Qaeda.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev FBI poster

Dahir Adan went on a knife-wielding rampage at a mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota, on September 17, 2016. He stabbed 10 mall visitors before he was shot to death by an off-duty police officer. According to news reports and witnesses, he shouted “Allahu Akbar” and asked at least one victim whether he was Muslim. Adan’s family are Somalis, but he was born while they were living in Kenya. They moved to the United States as refugees and Adan became a U.S. citizen in 2008.

Dahir Adan facebook 640x480

Abdullatif Ali Aldosary, an Iraqi refugee who came to the United States in 1997, was charged with detonating a homemade explosive device outside a Social Security Administration office building in Casa Grande, Arizona, in 2012. He was convicted and is serving a five-year prison sentence.

Abdul Razak Ali Artan engaged in a car-ramming attack and mass stabbing at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, on November 28, 2016. Thirteen students and staff members were injured before Artan was shot and killed by a campus police officer. Artan was a Muslim Somali refugee who had gained permanent-resident status. In an interview with a student newspaper, The Lantern, he claimed that Donald Trump was not “educated on Islam,” and complained that the U.S. media portray Muslims negatively.

14470415 10211160065225478 677111848411915926 n

Ahmad Khan Rahimi, the “Chelsea Bomber,” came to the United States in 2000, following his parents, who had claimed asylum here years before. In 2011, he received his U.S. citizenship. He is charged with a three-day bombing rampage (September 17-19, 2016) in which homemade explosive devices were planted in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan, New York City, and Elizabeth, New Jersey. He was captured following a shootout that left Rahimi and three police officers injured. He is being defended by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and is awaiting trial on multiple charges.

best b3dd70ee2b7e987c81e6 terrorist

Mohamed Barry, a Muslim immigrant from the West African country of Guinea, walked into Nazareth Restaurant, a Jewish-owned eatery in Columbus, Ohio, on February 11, 2016 and began attacking patrons with a machete. Four people were injured in the attack before Barry was shot and killed by responding police. He had arrived in this country in 2000 and had obtained his permanent-resident green card. Barry shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he attacked the restaurant patrons.

Mohamed Osman Mohamud, a Somali refugee known as the “Oregon Christmas Tree Bomber,” was arrested in November 2010 for attempting to set off a bomb at the annual Christmas tree lighting ceremony in downtown Portland, which was attended by thousands of people. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison in October, 2014.

AP 101206017812

Ahmad Abousamra, allegedly a top computer whiz for al-Qaeda, is also said to be operating social media for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (also known as ISIS and ISIL). He is currently wanted by the FBI for conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to kill in a foreign country, and other charges. He is now a fugitive and believed to be living in Syria. He was born in France but grew up in Boston, his father being a prominent physician at Massachusetts General Hospital. Although his family is Muslim, he attended Catholic schools and obtained a bachelor of science degree in computer science from the University of Massachusetts, Boston, in 2006.

abousamra

Syed Rizwan Farook and Tafsheen Malik, the “San Bernadino Shooters,” armed themselves with multiple firearms and explosive devices, and the husband-and-wife terror team attacked an employee Christmas party at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernadino, California on December 2, 2015. They killed 14 people and wounded 22 others before they were themselves killed by police gunfire. The explosive devices they had set were not detonated, and were disposed of by the police bomb squad. Farook and Malik were described as “devout Sunni Muslims.” Farook was born in the United States of immigrant parents from Pakistan. He brought Malik into the country on a K-1 “fiancé” visa, the legacy of our overly generous “family reunification” program.

Omar Mir Seddique Mateen, the “Orlando Nightclub Shooter,” killed 49 people and wounded an additional 53 in a mass shooting at a homosexual nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on June 12, 2016. He was subsequently shot and killed by police responding to the scene of the crime. Mateen was born in the United States to Muslim parents who had fled Afganistan, and had expressed support for the Taliban and ISIL/ISIS, as well as claiming to co-workers that he had connections to Hezbollah.

Omar Mateen

Esar Met, a 27-year-old Burmese refugee of the Rohingya Muslim sect, represents a different kind of terror that is now stalking much of Europe and is increasingly becoming the norm in communities across the United States. In 2014 Met was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences, without the possibility of parole, for the kidnapping and brutal rape/murder of a seven-year-old refugee girl, Hser Ner Moo, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Utah’s chief medical examiner, Todd Grey, said the little girl suffered “excruciating pain during the ordeal from multiple injuries, before death. A report in the Salt Lake Tribune noted:

In an autopsy performed on April 2, 2008 — the day after Hser Ner Moo was found dead in a South Salt Lake basement apartment — Grey ruled that the sum of these injuries caused the child’s death:

The wound to the girl’s heart, a tear in its right atrium, was the most lethal.

“This would have been excruciating pain,” Grey said. “This was a homicide, a death due to an intentional action by another person.”

The child’s face was bruised a deep purple, with a scratch on her left temple just above her eye. The girl’s left forearm, which was broken in two places, was unnaturally bent at a near-right angle. Scratches and marks lined her chest, her back and her neck.

It was not clear how the child suffered such severe injuries, Grey said, but several were likely caused by a blunt object hitting or being pressed against her body. Marks around Hser Ner Moo’s neck suggested asphyxia, and Grey said it was possible that she was strangled.

Omar Mohamed Kalmio, a Somali refugee, has been convicted and sent to prison for the murder of four people. On January 28, Kalmio murdered his girlfriend, Sabrina Zephier, in Minot, North Dakota, then drove across town and shot to death Sabrina Zephier’s mother, Jolene Zephier; brother, Dillon Zephier; and Jolene Zephier’s boyfriend, Jeremy Longie.

Salam Al Haideri, 24, an Iraqi refugee, was convicted in 2014 in Albany, New York, and sentenced to five years in prison for viciously beating and raping a 19-year-old woman. His sentencing followed convictions in separate sex crimes in the Albany area for Walid Nehma, 30, an Iraqi refugee, and Salah Mhawesh, 34, an Egyptian refugee.

Although the politically/religiously motivated terror attacks receive the most headlines and news coverage, the kind of terror caused by rapists and murderers such as Esar Met, Salam Al Haideri, and Omar Mohamed Kalmio is more likely to be experienced by the average American, especially as thousands of more thugs are allowed to migrate into the United States as “refugees.” The pro-open-borders media censor much of the refugee-related crime from the news, preferring instead to deluge the public with non-stop, heart-string stories about refugee Muslim families meeting “welcoming communities.” However, the stories we have mentioned above are barely the tip of the iceberg. For more detailed information on the truly horrific terror-and-crime wave that is being perpetrated by the refugee and illegal alien tsunami, see hereherehere, and here.

CFSii banner

Photos of police investigating crime scene after terrorist attack at Ohio State University and Mohamed Osman Mohamud: AP Images

Related articles:

Germany’s Terror, Mayhem, and Murder Spree: Thank You, Mrs. Merkel

Germany Does Not Know Where 130,000 Asylum Seekers Are

Refugee Crisis Has Europe on the Brink, Establishment Admits

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/25429-the-terrorists-among-us-rarely-mentioned-not-so-peaceful-refugees-and-immigrants


Swedish Police: Government Covering Up Huge Migrant Crime Spree

Feb 21, 2017  by 

Swedish Police: Government Covering Up Huge Migrant Crime Spree

A Swedish police officer put his career and even his liberty on the line — in Sweden, even the truth can get you jailed for “hate speech” — to give his countrymen what he viewed as an urgent warning. Writing on social media, the senior detective, Peter Springare, explained that Swedish authorities were covering up a massive crime wave among primarily African and Middle Eastern migrants that has law-enforcement and the rest of society’s institutions on the brink. The revelations, subsequently echoed by another officer who stepped forward to confirm Springare’s report, blew a giant hole in the Swedish government’s imploding narrative. Making matters worse for the narrative, a violent riot broke out on February 20 after an arrest in the immigrant-dominated Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby — an area that has seen frequent migrant riots, car burnings, shootings, and other chaos in recent years.

The explosive revelations and developments came just weeks before President Donald Trump, after speaking at a rally in Florida, came under intense fire from the establishment media and Swedish politicians for a remark suggesting Sweden had suffered adverse effects from the tsunami of Third World immigration in recent years. “You look at what’s happening in Germany. You look at what’s happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this? Sweden. They took in large numbers and they’re having problems like they never thought possible,” Trump said somewhat clumsily, saying, “We need to keep our country safe.” Trump later clarified that he was referring to a Fox News story on immigration and its effects in Sweden.

Swedish politicians, government-funded Swedish media outlets, and far-left U.S. establishment media organs all feigned shock, pretending that Sweden was absorbing the hundreds of thousands of migrants without a hitch. Some especially dishonest media even claimed, falsely, that Trump had cited a non-existent terror attack that allegedly struck Sweden the previous day. But while official statistics and statements by government officials suggest everything is fine — Swedish crime statistics claim that crime numbers in recent years have been essentially in line with past years — Springare and a growing body of evidence indicate that the truth is less rosy than Swedish politicians and bureaucrats would like people to believe.

The Swedish officer turned whistleblower, a 47-year veteran of law enforcement, painted a picture of absolute chaos — and that is just in the small town of Örebro with just over 100,000 residents. “Here we go; this is what I’ve handled from Monday-Friday this week: rape, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, rape-assault and rape, extortion, blackmail, assault, violence against police, threats to police, drug crime, drugs, crime, felony, attempted murder, rape again, extortion again and ill-treatment,” Springare wrote, expressing despair amid what he described as a society on the brink of collapse.

The suspects, he continued, are virtually all African and Middle Eastern migrants. “Suspected perpetrators; Ali Mohammed, Mahmod, Mohammed, Mohammed Ali, again, again, again, Christopher … Mohammed, Mahmod Ali, again and again,” Springare continued, noting that the solitary Swedish name, Christopher, did “sneak in on the edges” of a drug crime. “Countries representing all the crimes this week: Iraq, Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Somalia, Syria again, Somalia, unknown, unknown country, Sweden. Half of the suspects, we can’t be sure because they don’t have any valid papers. Which in itself usually means that they’re lying about their nationality and identity.”

He noted that the week-long crime spree he described was only in Örebro, a once peaceful Swedish town not too far from Stockholm that was once primarily notable for a medieval castle popular with tourists. But other Swedish cities are also on the brink. Last month, for example, the police chief in Malmo, one of Sweden’s largest and most immigrant-heavy cities — more than a third of the population is foreign born, not including the children of immigrants — pleaded for help amid a wave of murders, bombings, rapes, assaults, and more. “We cannot do it on our own,” Chief Stefan Sinteus wrote in an open letter, describing an “upward spiral of violence.” The city of about 350,000 had 52 bombings with grenades last year, up from 48 the year before, according to statistics from the Swedish police.

According to Springare, the crime wave associated with primarily Islamic migrants has law enforcement on the brink. “These crimes occupy 100 percent of our investigative capacity,” he added. And it is hardly just law enforcement that is struggling to cope. “Our pensioners are on their knees, the schools are in chaos, healthcare is an inferno, the police have been totally wrecked, etc, etc,” he continued in his post, which has been shared on social media more than 20,000 times since being posted on February 3 and sparked headlines around the world.

All of his revelations, which were subsequently confirmed by another officer who stepped forward, would seem to be at odds with the harmonious picture painted by Swedish politicians, government-funded media outlets, the tax-funded agency that is charged with promoting a positive image of Sweden abroad, and even official statistics. More than a few media organs in Sweden and the United States pointed to official statistics compiled by the government to make the case that crime rates have largely remained flat in recent years amid a massive influx of around 200,000 Islamic migrants. But Springare, well aware of the government’s numbers, suggests that manipulation, deceit, and a gag order are at work.

“What I will write here below, is not politically correct. But I don’t care,” he said in the opening of his post. “What I’m going to reveal to all you taxpayers is prohibited for us state employees to say. It tends to result in a loss of career and salary. Even though it’s true. I don’t care about all of this, will soon still retire after 47 years in this career. I will now and every week from now on report in detail what is keeping me busy as a lead investigator at the severe crimes unit in the Orebro police department. It’s not going to be in harmony with the opinion of Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention or other leftist criminologists’ perception in the general debate.”

“We all know why but no one dares to say the reason,” he said about society’s institutions being on the verge of breaking down. He argued, “Sweden has always lived on the myth of being the ultimate perfect society with never-ending resources to be at the forefront when it comes to being the only politically correct option in a dysfunctional world.” Also, looking at just the latest two years’ statistics may miss the larger story, with Springare saying the situation with massive crime among migrants, and migrants disproportionately represented in crime, has been happening for the last 10 to 15 years. Over the last 15 years, Sweden has taken in some 650,000 asylum seekers.

After the stunning revelations went viral in Sweden but before they became an international sensation, Swedish officials — as if to confirm Springare’s accusations — announced that they were investigating the officer for alleged hate speech. “It is a crime in the Criminal Code and I have decided to initiate a preliminary investigation of the crime,” Maria Sterup, chief prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office in Malmö, was quoted as saying in Swedish media, almost all of which is funded by government. How she concluded that it was a crime before an investigation and prosecution was not immediately clear, but truth is not a defense to the charges (the “justice” system even claimed the Bible was a violation of draconian Swedish speech laws). Eventually, with the story making headlines around the world, prosecutors dropped the case, probably hoping to avoid a follow-up scandal involving the government’s draconian restrictions on freedom of speech.

The Swedish government does not keep crime statistics by immigration status or national origin. However, despite making up excuses, even top Swedish officials acknowledged the reality. “Sweden’s earlier figures and numerous international studies all show much the same thing,” Justice Minister Morgan Johansson told a government-controlled media outlet. “Minority groups are often overrepresented in crime statistics, but when controlling for socioeconomic factors this [the overrepresentation of minority groups] disappears almost entirely.” In other words, it is because they are poor. Of the 163,000 “refugees” who arrived in Sweden in 2015, less than 500 had found jobs by summer of 2016.

Despite the lack of official numbers, another officer also went public with similar accusations after Springare was viciously attacked for reporting his observations to the public. “I share Peters’ views on this infected issue 100 percent,” declared Gothenburg police officer Tomas Asenlov, who has worked in law enforcement for more than 43 years. “Our leaders do not dare to take a position in any direction. As you can see, there is no high ranking official who has dared to give Peter backing. Instead, Code 291 was introduced, which cover all information about the immigration-related crime. Just look at the photo ban at the police station. Frightening in Sweden today.”

“To top it all the police chief himself reported it to the Authority,” Asenlov continued. “Instead of supporting his staff. Otherwise heads become relocated if they are not dancing in front of the national police chief’s barrel. The Swedish public has to be told all the facts now. I understand that the younger officers may not dare to go out and criticize the leaders, or go out openly and support Peter. Then it is over for a future career. Then, when they apply for jobs, they will be classed as disloyal to the employer. I myself will soon retire, so they can criticize my opinion. I have previously been called in for correction when I had opinions on this forum. Now I believe that the ball has started rolling and maybe we can get the leaders to open their eyes and no longer deny the truth.”

All of that happened before Trump spoke to supporters in Melbourne, Florida, over the weekend to warn about the consequences of the globalist-engineered mass migration that has swamped Europe in recent years after turning into a veritable tsunami amid the globalist scheming in Syria and Libya. Much of the establishment media, which Trump has increasingly (and accurately) dismissed as “fake news,” even tried to peddle fake news surrounding his comments. In fact, countless pseudo-“mainstream” media outlets claimed Trump had invented a “terror attack” in Sweden, when he said no such thing, further confirming their reputation as deceitful purveyors of fake news.

Trump and White House officials all later explained that Trump was talking about rising crime and other problems, not a specific terror attack, facing Sweden and other countries. There have been a number of high-profile attacks in Europe over the last few years. Trump himself later took to Twitter and pointed out that he was referring to a Fox News segment that highlighted the effects of mass migration on Sweden — not a “terror attack” that the media falsely claimed he had referred to. He also took the opportunity to blast the media again. “Give the public a break — The FAKE NEWS media is trying to say that large scale immigration in Sweden is working out just beautifully. NOT!” Trump tweeted.

The segment Trump was referring to was on the Tucker Carlson show and featured information about a new documentary that highlights the escalating migration-related problems facing Sweden such as surging rape levels, murder, no-go zones, and more. Carlson himself expressed dismay about how the media was missing the point. “It seems like we may be missing the point of the story, which is there has been a massive social cost associated with the refugee policies and the immigration policies of Western Europe,” he said on Fox. “Fifty years of immigration policy is coming to flower in Europe. We’re not paying any attention. We’re not drawing any of the obvious lessons from it. It’s not working. That’s the real point here.”

As The New American has documented extensively, the growing tsunami of migrants flooding into Europe from Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and beyond has the continent on the brink. And that is the point. In fact, globalists deliberately engineered the situation, first bombing and destroying multiple Third World countries — Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and more — and then offering huge sums of tax money to migrants who made it to Europe. The United Nations has overseen much of the scheme. And now, with the problems becoming obvious for all to see, the same globalist establishment that caused the chaos is exploiting it to wage war on liberty, national sovereignty, and even nationhood as it has traditionally been understood.

Humanity must resist, starting by holding the establishment perpetrators behind the tragic situation accountable for their crimes.

Photo of police vehicle in Stockholm during rioting, Feb. 20, 2017: AP Images 

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.

Related articles:

Refugee Crisis: Using Chaos to Build Power

Refugee Crisis Has Europe on the Brink

Swedes and Germans Told to Integrate Into Their “New Country”

UN “Together” Propaganda Bid Seeks to Flood West With Migrants

German Newspaper: Officials Are Covering Up Crimes by Migrants

Hungarian PM: Mass Migration a Plot to Destroy Christian West

Americans, Europeans Agree: Trump Is Right on Immigration

Cover-up: The Swedish Left’s Sacrifice of Women to Political Correctness

Should Churches Remove Crosses to Make Muslim Migrants Feel at Home?

New Swedish Law Criminalizes Anti-immigration Internet Speech

Trump Calls Media Out for “Fake News”

U.S. Tech Giants Join EU to Censor the Internet

Homeschoolers Flee Persecution in Germany and Sweden

European Anti-Globalists Join Forces to Take Back Countries

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/25428-swedish-police-government-covering-up-huge-migrant-crime-spree


The Truth About Sweden


Rape of the West: Migrants Destroy Nations


Trump adviser says U.S. has ‘huge problems’ with terrorists abusing refugee program


High stakes for Tillerson, Kelly diplomatic trip to Mexico | Feb 22, 2017


isis-rapefugee-women-children


Related

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/02/22/graphic-cartel-assassins-stalked-prosecutor-days-murder/

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/02/22/nyc-gave-sanctuary-illegal-immigrant-ms-13-gang-member-feds-say/

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/02/22/paris-tourism-falls-1-5-million-2016-terror-fears/

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/02/22/pope-francis-rejection-migrants-stoked-populist-rhetoric/

http://www.infowars.com/leftists-in-germany-want-to-give-refugees-the-vote/

http://www.infowars.com/terror-in-sweden-chemical-attack-on-train-chokes-passengers/

http://www.infowars.com/leaked-report-six-million-migrants-want-to-enter-europe/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

CHILLING new scandal hits Democrats; media SILENT

Allen West: CHILLING new scandal hits Democrats; media SILENT 

Feb 21, 2107 by Allen West

 

I know, I know, it’s the Russians! They’re hacking our election and influencing our current presidential administration. Folks, that’s been the standard line from the progressive socialist left for quite sometime.

It’s been a game of the ol’ Kansas City Shuffle —ya know, you look left, they go right. It’s amazing how the liberal progressive media just doesn’t seem to want to confront the Democrat Party about flaws, failures, shortcomings, and scandals. And then folks wonder why they’re losing credibility?

Monday evening here on the MRC cruise aboard the Celebrity Silhouette, some fella saw the lanyard and MRC badge around my neck. He asked me what the Media Research Center was and I explained it was a conservative media group. His response was “so you’re the group that believes everyone is lying to you?” I just looked over my shoulder and said, “no, we’re the folks who can think for ourselves.”

I wonder what that cheeky little fella would say about this continuing story, about which you’ve heard little in the mainstream liberal media. We shared this story originally a few weeks ago, but it just got even more disturbing.

As reported by the Daily Caller, “Rogue congressional staffers took $100,000 from an Iraqi politician while they had administrator-level access to the House of Representatives’ computer network, according to court documents examined by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. 

The money was a loan from a Dr. Ali al-Attar, an Iraqi political figure, and was funneled through a company with “impossible”-to-decipher financial transactions that the congressional information technology (IT) staffers controlled. 

Imran Awan, ringleader of the group that includes his brothers Abid and Jamal, has provided IT services since 2005 for Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman.

The brothers are from Pakistan. The trio also worked for dozens of other House Democrats, including members of the intelligence, foreign affairs and homeland security committees. Those positions likely gave them access to congressional emails and other sensitive documents.

The brothers, whose access to House IT networks has been terminated, are under criminal investigation by the U.S. Capitol Police. Wasserman Schultz resigned from her DNC post following a disastrous email hack during the 2016 campaign. Her House spokesman did not respond to TheDCNF’s question Monday about Imran’s employment status.

As of Feb. 6, she had declined to fire Imran. Investigators found that congressional information was being copied to an off-site server and they suspect the brothers of improperly accessing information and stealing congressional property. Chiefs of staff for the employing Democrats were notified Feb. 2.

Soon after Imran began working for members of Congress, Imran’s and Abid’s wives — Hina Alvi and Natalia Sova — also began receiving congressional paychecks, TheDCNF found. Imran’s employers included two members of the intelligence committee, Indiana Democrat Rep. Andre Carson and California Democrat Rep. Jackie Speier. By 2009, the family was simultaneously managing a full-time car dealership in Virginia, with Abid running day-to-day operations after contributing $250,000 in startup cash. It was called Cars International A, LLC, referred to as “CIA” in court documents.

Imran boasted unusual clout among House Democrats, and was even pictured conversing with former President Bill Clinton. After Rao Abbas, who was owed money by the dealership, threatened to sue amidst allegations of deception and theft, Abbas appeared on the congressional payroll and received $250,000 in taxpayer payments.”

Now, I’m onboard a cruise ship, but we still get the news, and I haven’t seen any of this covered on CNN, NBC  or MSNBC. I saw a lot of coverage about the “not my president” protest or the protests in London to refuse our president the invitation to an official state visit. This is what the American people see, and it angers them — the blatant duplicitous hypocrisy. Comparing the November election to 9-11 or Pearl Harbor is insidious and far over the top, but that’s NEWS on the liberal progressive left.

Ok, let’s just imagine this, if we had three Russian brothers who were IT specialists working for Republican Members of Congress…yep, you get my drift. The story would be all over the place and there would be demands for these Members of Congress to step down, certainly be investigated.

But have you heard anything about this story, this revelation? As Ricky Bobby would say, “this just happened” but not in the world of the left. You see, the leftist media dismisses that which does not serve their ideological agenda and talking points. There is no way they’re going to bring this to light, just like there’s no such thing as an IRS scandal, and nothing happened in Benghazi. Or what is Extortion 17? Who is Army 1LT Clint Lorance? This isn’t so much about “fake news,” it’s about “selected news” and that is always about what the left deems important.

On this cruise, we have the head of ACT for America, Brigitte Gabriel, who is currently fighting against a smear campaign by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). As well, when did you hear the liberal progressive media discuss the background of the organizer of the Million Women’s March the day after the president’s inauguration day, Linda Sarsour. It was Ms. Sarsour who made some very disturbing comments about what she wished would happen to Brigitte Gabriel, which we shared here. However, were there any reports by the leftist media about Ms. Sarsour and her background? Nah, crickets.

This is why Brent Bozell’s Media Research Center is so important, celebrating their 30th year. This is why I’m so honored to be here on their second sponsored cruise with some fantastic conservatives. We must be better informed, and we need to have an organization that evidences the obfuscation, denial, dismissal, and outright lies of the liberal progressive media — heck, to listen to MSNBC, you’d think Obamacare and socialized medicine are the greatest things since Goober grape. However, talk to the Canadians who are here on the MRC cruise and they’ll give you a different story.

The leftist media keeps droning on about the “alt-right” but my question is, when are they going to talk about themselves, and the story of the Awan brothers?

Ah, I guess collusion with Islamists is just fine with the left.

http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/chilling-new-scandal-hits-democrats-media-silent

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

ISIS guard watched women given away as sex slaves until he couldn’t take it anymore

 

Feb 21, 2017 By Mark Ellis


Women captured by ISIS

After ISIS captured his city in Syria, one man thought life would be good, living in their self-proclaimed caliphate. But when he witnessed the mistreatment of female captives as sex slaves, he became disillusioned and fled.

“When they (ISIS) first came, things were very good,” Nizar* told the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism.  “It really felt like Islam. We started going to the mosque. A sheikh would give lessons in the Qur’an.”

The sheikh taught him ISIS was in the right and there would be no injustice. Nizar and his wife thought they could go on with normal life.

He became a guard at the detention center for the “hisbah,” or religious police. Every day as many as 100 men were brought in for various infractions of sharia law, such as smoking or having a wife that lacked the proper covering.

“They were imprisoned, whipped and beaten. After two or three days they were released,” he noted.

There were also 475 women captives at the facility, including Yazidis and Iraqis — some the wives of Iraqi army soldiers.


female captives of ISIS

“When I walked down the corridor, I was shocked looking at all these women,” Nizar recounted. “Some of the Yazidi girls would cry.”

“Why are you crying?” he called out.

“We have been separated from our children,” they replied. Some were young mothers who had their infants and toddlers stripped from them.

“Is this your Islam?” they asked him.

Nizar walked away downcast and resumed his post, guarding the door.

When foreign fighters received news that new female captives had arrived, Nizar could hear them cheering


ISIS detention facility

raucously.

“So the prison warden would bring 10 foreign fighters at a time because they could not be brought in all at once. We would guard the doors and they would go in and choose a captive woman.”

The ISIS fighters would grab their new sex slaves and leave. This went on for three days, each young woman being treated like chattel property, forced into marriages with strangers, against their will.

The female prisoners were certain they would be executed if they did not go, Nizar noted. The women resigned themselves to be sexually abused rather than killed.


Women held by ISIS

Nizar recalled one young woman huddled in the corner with her head down, tears in her eyes. He could tell she had not been sleeping properly.

One day a Sudanese foreign fighter picked a 15-year-old girl and raped her in the cell. “She started bleeding badly. An ambulance came to take her. The girl had internal bleeding and died from the injuries,” Nizar said.

He was warned not to speak about the incident. “Captives are captives,” he was told. “Do as you please with them.”

Nizar began to have nightmares about what he was witnessing. “That’s when I started thinking I should leave. The next week, I requested a three-day break to go home and rest.”

Symptoms resembling PTSD began to take root in his troubled soul. “I felt tired and uncomfortable. I lost my appetite. I thought of them as my sisters.”

He finally broke down and told his wife and sisters about everything he was witnessing.

“We have to escape to Turkey as soon as possible,” they said. “If something happens to you, then the same thing would happen to us.”

Sadly, the nightmares will not go away. “Every so often I dream that they are pulling my hair by the scalp and about to slit my throat.” Then he wakes up abruptly.

The memories continue to stay in his mind. “I try not to think about it,” he said. “It’ll drive me crazy.”

“I advise all Arab men not to come to Syria. Those who wish to come to ad-Dawlah should think about the rape and killing of the poor…and the oppression. If you think about leaving, they will kill you.

“Once you get in the sand, it will turn into quicksand – as soon as you’re in it, you drown.”

 

*name changed for security reasons

For more about the The International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism, go here: www.icsve.org

http://blog.godreports.com/2017/02/isis-guard-watched-women-given-away-as-sex-slaves-until-he-couldnt-take-it-anymore/


isis-sex-slavery

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments