Globalists Fulminate Over Trump Smack to G7, New World Order
June 12, 2018 by William F. Jasper
“Trump just blew up the G-7. Now what?” That’s the title of a June 11 piece by former advisor to President Bill Clinton (and former State Department security risk) Strobe Talbott for Politico. Joining a bevy of fellow bloviators from the establishment press that began attacking President Trump even before he left for the G7 summit in Canada, Talbott accused Trump of being “the democratic world’s worst nightmare” and trumpeted the Trump-Russia collusion charge.
Yes, the same Trump-Russia collusion charge (sans an iota of evidence, as usual) that Talbott, the Democrats, and Talbott’s media brethren have been flogging for going on two years. This is especially rich coming from Talbott, who, it may be recalled, has a long and infamous Talbott-Brezhnev-Gorbachev-Soviet Union collusion history dating back to his Soviet sojourn in the 1960s-70s, and his tutelage under the notorious KGB “journalist” Victor Louis. Yet, such is the upside-down geopolitical world of today that extreme leftists (and even open pro-communists and communists) who notoriously “colluded” with the Soviet Union, Communist China, Communist Cuba, and every other communist regime for the past several decades, are treated as credible critics of Russia today, particularly when they are attacking President Trump for collusion, absent any evidence.
“Nearly a year and a half into his tenure, the president remains under suspicion that Russian entities cozied up to his campaign — and vice versa,” Talbott wrote in his Politico op-ed. “That darkening cloud itself weakens him and the country he leads, but not as much as his upending of seven decades of American priorities, strategies and partners. Trump told the press last week, with apparent pride, that he is ‘Russia’s worst nightmare.’ Wrong. He is the democratic world’s worst nightmare. He has crippled NATO, the North Atlantic community, the European Union and now the G-7. In Putin’s zero-sum worldview, that is a dream come true.”
For 15 years (2002-2017) Talbott was president of the Brookings Institution, where he remains a “Distinguished Fellow in Residence.” The left-tilted Brookings is a sister think-tank to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the acknowledged “brain trust” of the organized forces pushing to build world government and ditch national sovereignty for the past century. Talbott is a longtime CFR member. He is also a member of the super-elite Trilateral Commission, and an attendee at the ultra-secretive Bilderberg Group conferences. Talbott’s Politico diatribe against Trump’s G7 performance is posted on the special Brookings webpage, “Order from Chaos,” which carries many other essays by prominent globalists. The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry (1874) by Dr. Albert G. Mackey, one of America’s most noted freemasons and masonic scholars, states that Order out of Chaos (Ordo Ab Chao in Latin) is “A motto of the 33rd degree” in freemasonry, and that “the invention of this motto is to be attributed to the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite at Charleston” in 1802.
Among the “great and good” piling on Trump, along with Talbott, was Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, now Charles W. Eliot university professor at Harvard. Like Talbott, he is a member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, and a Bilderberger. It may be due to the fact that the G7 summit and the Bilderberg conference were held on the same four-day weekend (June 7-10), and that he was going to be preoccupied with his Bilderberg cohorts in Turin, Italy, that Summers took the opportunity to launch a preemptive assault on President Trump several days before the Canadian G7 confab. In a column on June 4 for the influential Financial Times of the U.K. entitled “Donald Trump’s trade policy violates every rule of strategy,” Summers attempted to make the case that our decades of disastrous trade policies (which he had a significant hand in forming) are just fine and must be preserved. President Trump’s trade proposals, on the other hand, “will reduce our legitimacy and power by demonstrating our lack of competence.”
CFR Senior Fellow Max Boot, a “Never Trump” Republican who endorsed Hillary Clinton for president and has been a relentless anti-Trumper, got in on the act, of course, with a June 11 blast at the president in the Washington Post entitled “Trump turns the G7 into the G6 versus G1.”
“In just the past few weeks, [Trump] has taken a giant step towards destroying the global system that the United States created after 1945,” Boot lamented. “Trump has now exited three major treaties — the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord and the Iran nuclear accord — and thrown into doubt the future of another — the North American Free Trade Agreement — while launching a reckless trade war against America’s closest allies,” Boot went on. “At the Group of Seven summit, Trump continued to push his irrational idée fixe that the United States — the richest nation in the world — has been victimized by its friends. ‘We’re like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing,’ Trump seethed. ‘And that ends.’ The President’s outbursts turned the summit into the G6 versus the G1.”
Only a few months ago, in December 2017, Boot was jubilantly noting that his fellow CFR globalists within the Trump State Department had pulled one over on their boss (President Trump) by writing the president’s National Security Strategy (NSS) report in such a way that it could be read as a “cri du coeur [cry of the heart] from inside the Deep State signaling to the outside world that Trumpian thinking has not entirely taken over the U.S. government.” (See here and here.) Boot, a perennial “expert” talking head on the major media news programs, has never bothered to disguise his hostility toward Donald Trump. He, undoubtedly, was shaken by President Trump’s firing of CFR members H.R. McMaster and Nadia Schadlow, the key authors of the NSS report Boot had praised, and both of whom had been attendees at the 2017 Bilderberg conclave. (Schadlow, who was back again at the Bilderberg gathering in Turin this year, likely received both congratulations and condolences from fellow Bilderbergers for what she had done — and what “might have been,” if the Deep State had already succeeded in ousting Trump.)
Here are a few more of the many elitists in the CFR-Trilateral-Bilderberg chorus who have been taking the side of Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, and the other G6 leaders that toed the one-world line against President Trump and the United States:
U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California), a member of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, and attendee of past Bilderberg confabs — Speaking with CNN’s Jake Tapper (CFR member), Feinstein said that President Trump’s decision to go against “our best allies” and not sign the G7 Communique, which “stands for everything we stand for is a big mistake.”
If the “we” Senator Feinstein invokes is understood to mean the collective globalists, then her claim is accurate, but the G7 has never stood for everything that we, as Americans, stand for. To the contrary, it has always stood for internationalism vs. nationalism, one-worldism vs. national sovereignty, collective might vs. individual right. The G7 Communique to which Senator Feinstein so reverentially refers is hardly a manifesto that we should endorse, and we may consider ourselves fortunate that President Trump did not sign on to it. Besides endorsing the World Trade Organization, the UN’s Agenda 2030, the UN’s fraudulent Paris Agreement on global warming, the UN’s phony sustainable development, and a passel of additional socialist, globalist programs (to be detailed in a follow-up analysis) the G7 Communique is a paean to multilateralism, and like all of its G7 predecessors, a prescription for step-by-step advancement toward a world government run by unaccountable globalist elites.
U.S. Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) — a CFR member, longtime UN supporter, Republican promoter of globalism, and a vociferous opponent of President Trump — Tweeted on June 9: “To our allies: bipartisan majorities of Americans remain pro-free trade, pro-globalization & supportive of alliances based on 70 years of shared values. Americans stand with you, even if our president doesn’t.”
McCain’s tweet was picked up by much of the “mainstream” media to launch still more attacks on Trump’s words and actions at the G7 summit. Former McCain aide Steve Schmidt, now a commentator at MSNBC and one of the most vicious “Republican” anti-Trumpers, tweeted: “TRUMP disgraced the Presidency and the United States at the G-7 summit. From his slovenly appearance to his unpreparedness, ignorance and arrogance, he beclowned himself. The Republican majority is filled with cowards who are servile supplicants to the most unfit POTUS ever.” And, of course, his tweet (and his follow-ups to it) provided the pretext for more rounds of stories in the Fake News media about the supposed terrible damage the president’s words and actions at the G7 had done to America’s standing in the world and to relations with our “allies.”
Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass — Speaking on MSNBC’s “Nightly News with Lester Holt,” the CFR chief insisted that “all sides have benefitted from these free trade agreements, and the president’s narrow fixation on bilateral balances is simply not the way to measure these agreements.” According to Haass, Trump’s misguided trade policies will result in losing ten jobs for every one it saves.
Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer, an ubiquitous talking head and so-called expert for many of the controlled media platforms, roundly chastised President Trump for being out of step with our G7 “partners.” Before, during, and after the summit, Bremmer could be seen on various programs (PBS, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NPR, etc.) dispensing his usual anti-Trump rhetoric. Following the summit, Bremmer tweeted a screen grab of his appearance on CNN with Wolf Blitzer. The CNN headline beneath the split-screen images of Bremmer and Blitzer asked: “Global Backlash — Trump Vs America’s Allies: Is the Old World Order Over?” Bremmer’s Twitter response to the headline question: “Yes, Wolf, I’m Afraid So.” In a June 7 post for the leftist Axios website column “Expert Voices,” Bremmer penned a piece entitled, “Frustration with U.S. setting stage for dysfunctional G7 summit.” “It will be the most dysfunctional G7 meeting — by a long margin — since the first in 1975,” he wrote, as the summit was opening. “Trump’s America First approach,” said Bremmer, “stands in direct opposition to the U.S.-led multilateral institutions of the postwar order. And that order was already facing major challenges before Trump…. The bottom line: The Trump administration has piled on and the U.S.-led order has crumbled more quickly than it otherwise would have.”
The “world order” built by the globalists since World War II is far from dead and over, but, clearly, President Donald Trump has tossed enough sand into the New World Order gearbox to throw its main promoters and their chattering class media shills into a non-stop tizzy.
Photo: AP Images
Related articles and videos:
Thank You, President Trump, For Not Signing the G7 Communique
June 12, 2018 by William F. Jasper
The globalists and their paid media shills are still ranting and fuming over President Trump’s refusal to play along with Angela Merkel, Justin Trudeau, and the other G7 leaders at the summit in Charlevoix, Quebec, this past weekend. They are especially agitated over his refusal to sign on to the Charlevoix G7 Summit Communique at the close of the gathering.
The statements issued at the conclusions of G7 summits are not legally binding, but they are important as “consensus” roadmaps that the G7 heads of state can brandish to prod their legislative bodies into adopting the agreed-upon multilateral agenda. Like the United Nations and other multilateral organizations, the G7 (Group of 7 — the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and Italy) is wont to issue flowery, noble-sounding statements freighted with traps and hidden meanings.
As we reported on June 11 following the summit (Globalists Fulminate Over Trump Smack to G7, New World Order), Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a longtime member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, and a past attendee of the secretive Bilderberg confabs, lamented on CNN that President Trump had gone against “our best allies” at Charlevoix by not signing the G7 Communique, which, she insisted, “stands for everything we stand for.”
Does the Charlevoix G7 Communique truly stand for everything we — the American people — stand for? This writer commented on that point in the June 11 article mentioned above, noting: “The G7 Communique to which Senator Feinstein so reverentially refers is hardly a manifesto that we should endorse, and we may consider ourselves fortunate that President Trump did not sign on to it. Besides endorsing the World Trade Organization, the UN’s Agenda 2030, the UN’s fraudulent Paris Agreement on global warming, the UN’s phony sustainable development, and a passel of additional socialist, globalist programs … the G7 Communique is a paean to multilateralism, and like all of its G7 predecessors, a prescription for step-by-step advancement toward a world government run by unaccountable globalist elites.”
Moreover, we could add that the newest G7 manifesto further commits the endorsing nations to push for more invasive and punitive taxes, even greater government spending (called “investing” in New World Order-speak), more onerous government surveillance (ostensibly to fight tax evasion and provide more security against terrorism and internet crime), and further exploitation of the conflicts and crises in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Israel, North Korea, and elsewhere, a virtual guarantee for involving us in perpetual wars all across the globe.
Now, let’s look at some specifics in the Charlevoix G7 Summit Communique to see why Americans should be thanking President Trump for refusing to sign it. (The full, official text of the document is available here on the G7 website). As is customary, it opens with broad, vanilla-flavored lines about prosperity, sustainability, equality, etc. It states:
We, the Leaders of the G7, have come together in Charlevoix, Quebec, Canada on June 8-9, 2018, guided by our shared values of freedom, democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and our commitment to promote a rules-based international order. As advanced economies and leading democracies, we share a fundamental commitment to investing in our citizens and meeting their needs and to responding to global challenges. We collectively affirm our strong determination to achieve a clean environment, clean air and clean water. We are resolved to work together in creating a healthy, prosperous, sustainable and fair future for all.
Point three of the 28-point Communique states:
In order to ensure that everyone pays their fair share, we will exchange approaches and support international efforts to deliver fair, progressive, effective and efficient tax systems. We will continue to fight tax evasion and avoidance by promoting the global implementation of international standards and addressing base erosion and profit shifting. The impacts of the digitalization of the economy on the international tax system remain key outstanding issues. We welcome the OECD interim report analyzing the impact of digitalization of the economy on the international tax system. We are committed to work together to seek a consensus-based solution by 2020.
The OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), an affiliated organization of the United Nations, is a major promoter of more extensive and oppressive taxation, and when globalists at the G7, UN, and OECD talk about fighting tax evasion, they really mean they’re going to find more ways to squeeze more money out of the middle classes. Point four of the Communique is a promotion for the World Trade Organization (WTO) noting a commitment to making “bilateral, regional and plurilateral agreements [are] open, transparent, inclusive and WTO-consistent.” It also states: “We commit to modernize the WTO to make it more fair as soon as possible.” Modernization proposals invariably are designed to make the WTO more powerful, but don’t count on it getting more fair or just.
Point seven of the G7 Communique is a promo for the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030, its plan for global socialism. Realizing that it cannot rally taxpayers of the developed countries to provide more “public financing” for its programs, the G7-UN-OECD crowd has come up with “blended finance,” in which globalist bankers and other private “investors” will chip in billions of dollars, but these contributions will be backed up, naturally, with public guarantees and insurance. This means, of course, that when the “sustainable development” projects turn out to be unsustainable and go bust, the taxpayers would be forced to bail them out. More details on this clever arrangement are to be found in the Charlevoix Commitment on Innovative Financing for Development, which the signatories of the Communique say they are committed to.
Point 22 states: “Africa’s security, stability, and sustainable development are high priorities for us, and we reiterate our support for African-led initiatives, including at a regional level. We reiterate our commitment to work in partnership with the African continent, supporting the African Union Agenda 2063 in order to realize Africa’s potential.” That might sound great, until you look a bit closer at the details. The New American’s Alex Newman, who has reported extensively on the African Union, wrote in 2016 that “Under the African Union’s so-called Agenda 2063, a Soviet-style, United Nations-backed 50-year plan to empower undemocratic supranational institutions and centralize coercive power, the peoples of the continent will be merged into one giant mass for easier control.”
Point 23 of the Communique restates the G7’s continued support for the UN’s ludicrous, ongoing jihad against carbon dioxide and for the UN’s upcoming conference on global warming (yes, another one). It says:
A healthy planet and sustainable economic growth are mutually beneficial, and therefore, we are pursuing global efforts towards a sustainable and resilient future that creates jobs for our citizens. We firmly support the broad participation and leadership of young people, girls and women in promoting sustainable development. We collectively affirm our strong determination to achieve a clean environment, clean air, clean water and healthy soil. We commit to ongoing action to strengthen our collective energy security and demonstrate leadership in ensuring that our energy systems continue to drive sustainable economic growth. We recognise that each country may chart its own path to achieving a low-emission future. We look forward to adopting a common set of guidelines at UNFCCC COP 24 [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 24th Conference of the Parties].”
Point 24 continues in the same vein, pledging “strong commitment to implement the Paris Agreement” by “Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the European Union.” The European Union? Yes, the EU participates in the G7, but does not enjoy voting status there — yet.
There is more than enough in the plain text of the Communique to warrant rejection by all liberty-minded individuals. However, that is not the whole of it. Imbedded within the text are endorsements of various programs and projects of the World Bank, OECD, World Health Organization, WTO, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, the Paris Club, and the following G7 positions, each of which is fraught with dangerous proposals:
This writer would dare any reasonable American to read each of these documents without coming to the conclusion that they are larded with innumerable dangerous traps that we should never get near, let alone endorse. Instead of being bashed, trashed, slammed, and insulted for refusing to sign this treacherous “communique,” President Trump should be thanked profusely for taking this unprecedented, sensible, and courageous action.
Photo: AP Images