Globalism walks like tyranny. Globalism talks like tyranny. Globalism is tyranny. Globalism is a clear and present danger to American democracy and American sovereignty
Walks Like a Globalist, Talks Like a Globalist, Thinks Like a Globalist: McMaster is a Globalist
Aug 10, 2017 By Linda Goudsmit
The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) is a British think tank specializing in international affairs. Founded in 1958 with a focus on nuclear deterrence and arms control IISS has expanded its presence and worldwide influence with offices in Washington, Singapore, and Bahrain. IISS advertises itself on its website claiming “IISS experts deliver impartial, rigorous analysis. They are drawn from all over the world, and include established world-class strategists, as well as the brightest young analysts. The institute’s corporate advisory arm offers strategic advice and political-risk analysis to commercial and government clients.” WOW!
Globalism is only non-partisan and independent to a globalist
The current stated mission of IISS is to promote global peace and security and maintain civilized international relations. Sounds great but there is a serious credibility problem – IISS is a globalist think tank. IISS claims to be non-partisan and independent of government and other bodies but its primary funding sources are the royal family of Bahrain, globalist organizations like Soros’ Open Society Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, and multinational globalist corporations that require US clearance and licenses to sell American products to foreign governments. Of particular interest are donor companies involved in aeronautics like Airbus, BAE Systems, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, and Raytheon International. Globalism is only non-partisan and independent to a globalist.
Being partisan or biased at this moment in history is not a matter of being a democrat or a republican. It is a matter of being a globalist or being an advocate of national sovereignty. It is the difference between Obama’s internationalism and President Trump’s America-first patriotism. American voters had a choice in 2016 to pledge allegiance to the United States of America or to pledge allegiance to the world. They chose America.
President Donald Trump campaigned on an America-first commitment. He promised to protect American sovereignty and reject Obama’s leftist internationalism, collectivism, and globalism. Globalist swamp creature John McCain recommended H.R. McMaster to be head of the National Security Council. Why? Because McMaster is a globalist who continues to support the Iran deal that only benefits Iran and the globalists. The NSC is charged with advising the president on national security issues and foreign policy. The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) where McMaster served for eleven years (2006-2017) is a strategic network advancing globalism that is philosophically opposed to the American patriotism and America-first commitments of President Trump.
Is McMaster an ideologue committed to globalism?
What was McMaster’s role in helping Obama impose the worst deal for America of all times?
McMaster was a consulting senior fellow of the globalist think tank advising American politicians toward globalism during Obama’s two terms. A think tank financed by multinational corporations seeking to sell their products to Iran cannot offer unbiased non-partisan security analysis when advising American politicians on whether selling American products to Iran is in our national interest. The conflict of interest is staggering. IISS was the middleman for the sale. The IISS endorsement of Obama’s infamous Iran deal downplayed the obvious dangers inherent in the deal and the corporate boon it was for the IISS globalist sponsors.
Is McMaster an ideologue committed to globalism? Did IISS compensate McMaster? Did the globalist financiers supporting IISS compensate McMaster? Is McMaster compensated by globalist institutions and globalists like Soros who are seeking an unrestricted worldwide market for their products using a “non-partisan independent” think tank to disguise their intentions?
Obama’s infamous nuclear deal lifted crippling economic sanctions against Iran and allowed American multinational corporations to trade internationally with Iran. In return the US was supposed to receive a more moderate Iran and a de-escalation of the Iranian nuclear program. Obama promised his nuclear deal would prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon or pursuing its nuclear program in secret because Iran had committed to “extraordinary and robust monitoring, verification, and inspection.” REALLY?? Any student of history knows that Iran remains on the list of state sponsors of terrorism because Iran does not abide by agreements! Iran has escalated its nuclear program with the 150 billion dollar cash bonus it received from liar-in-chief Barack Obama. The globalist corporations are making billions of dollars in trade with Iran. The swamp creatures slithered home with their payoffs. The American people got nothing – they are not safer or richer. Why?
H.R. McMaster was hired to help implement President Trump’s America-first agenda not to renew Obama’s anti-American trade agreements including the Iran deal
Because globalism does not benefit the people and because Barack Obama is an unapologetic globalist.
The biggest problem Obama had in making the infamous Iran deal was getting past the objective reality that his deal was empowering the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world by promoting a trade agreement that was enriching his globalist benefactors in industry. In order to sell the Iran deal Obama had to sell subjective reality to America. To dupe the American public Ben Rhodes and the Obama White House deliberately fed false information to their adoring media echo chamber that misled the American people about the Iran deal in twenty-four hour news cycles. Ben Rhodes actually bragged about the gullible young adoring journalists who repeated everything they were told without fact checking.
The good news is that the global trading permitted by the Iran deal requires renewal. If President Trump says no to the renewal then trade between Iran and the six participating countries will be shut down. There are billions of dollars at stake. Multinational corporations, multinational banks, the telecommunications industry, and the multinational oil and gas industries are all big winners from Obama’s globalist giveaway agreement. The most interesting industry affected, however, is the airline industry including airline manufacturing. Iran is not buying jets to shuttle passengers around the middle east anymore than Iran is expanding its nuclear program for non-military purposes. The possibilities of Iran moving men and equipment around the globe in American made jets is chilling.
H.R. McMaster walks like a globalist, talks like a globalist, and thinks like a globalist. H.R. McMaster is a globalist
H.R. McMaster was hired to help implement President Trump’s America-first agenda not to renew Obama’s anti-American trade agreements including the Iran deal.
President Trump cannot implement his America first policies with globalist McMaster as his national security adviser. McMaster continues to purge anti-globalist staffers who are critical of Obama and protects Obama’s remaining globalist staffers. McMaster allowed Obama loyalist Susan Rice to retain her national security clearance for highly sensitive and classified information after she participated in the unmasking scheme against Trump. Incredibly, McMaster defended Rice saying it was part of her job description. McMaster blocked Ayaan Hirsi Ali from speaking to the NSC. Ms Ali has far more authority on the subject of radical Islam and the existential dangers of sharia law than the globalist think tank informing McMaster. President Trump was very clear in identifying radical Islamic terrorism as an existential threat to America. Instead McMaster pursues Obama’s censorship policy and will not allow those words to be spoken. Why?
H.R. McMaster walks like a globalist, talks like a globalist, and thinks like a globalist. H.R. McMaster is a globalist.
If McMaster were simply a consultant offered an opposing perspective it would be beneficial – but he is a decision-maker advancing Obama’s globalism instead of President Trump’s America-first patriotism. Globalism is diametrically opposed to any nation’s sovereignty because ultimately it sees the world as one. Subjective reality romanticizes globalism in the lyrics of John Lennon’s song “Imagine.” Objective reality recognizes globalism as the new world order – the despotic binary socio-political structure of masters and slaves. The end game of globalism is one-world government that divides the world into the very few ruling elite and the enslaved population who serve them.
Globalism walks like tyranny. Globalism talks like tyranny. Globalism is tyranny. Globalism is a clear and present danger to American democracy and American sovereignty.
Mr President it is time to tell H.R. McMaster – YOU’RE FIRED!
TEL AVIV — In a speech following Israel’s defensive 2014 war against the Hamas terrorist group, embattled White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster sidestepped a question about whether the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) conducted itself in an ethical manner, instead providing what McMaster admitted was a “non-answer.”
The IDF is known to go to extreme lengths to operate ethically and protect civilians when fighting Palestinian jihadists who use civilians as human shields, launch rocket attacks from civilian zones and house their terrorist infrastructures in densely populated civilian areas.
Audio of the speech can be heard here. (McMaster’s Israel comments start at the 56 minute mark).
At a December 4, 2014 speech to the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, an audience member asked McMaster a direct question about the ethics of the IDF’s conduct in that year’s war against Hamas and in other wars.
McMaster was asked: “Firstly, would you consider the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] conduct of the recent war and prior wars as a template for the ethical conduct of war?”
Here is a transcript of McMaster’s reply, which he admitted was a “non-answer”:
Okay. So quickly on that, in terms of the IDF actions and how to evaluate them, I think you could evaluate them based on jus ad bellum sort of criteria of proportionality and distinction and so forth. I’m not the best judge of it. I’ve been following it in the media. I can’t really tell. I do know that they’re responding to attacks.
What you’re asking is, was the response proportional? Now, there’s different kinds of proportionality. There’s proportionality in war, and then there’s a broader sort of humanitarian standard that I think, at times, doesn’t apply as a complete transfer over to wartime situations. So that’s kind of a non-answer, sorry, to your first question.
A defender of Israel or even an objective observer would have noted that Israel goes beyond what almost any other country does to protect civilians and that the IDF is one of the most ethical militaries in the world. The IDF operates under the guidelines of international law, including the Law of Armed Conflict, and imposes its own, even stricter codes.
The IDF regularly warns those in civilian areas of incoming attacks with phone calls and text messages even though the terrorist targets will likely also learn about the warning. It employs “roof knocking” – or firing warning shots before any aerial bombing where civilians may be present. If civilians still don’t evacuate, the Israeli army many times makes announcements on loudspeakers. In the 2014 war, the IDF called off numerous military raids because civilians were in the way.
Despite its enormous firepower, the IDF severely restrains itself in order to minimize civilian casualties. To protect Palestinian civilians, the IDF has many times risked the lives of its own soldiers on house-to-house missions and other urban combat instead of using aerial power.
The IDF relates of the 2014 war:
The IDF took various steps to mitigate the risk of harm to civilian objects and the civilian population, including measures not required by the Law of Armed Conflict. Precautionary measures included a multi-layered system of effective advance warnings, sophisticated verification procedures, and the careful choice of means and methods of warfare (including munitions, timing and angle of attack). …
In addition, Israel requires that any means of warfare used during its military operations accord with Israel’s obligations under international law. Thus, for example, high-explosive artillery was required by IDF directives to be used in accordance with the rules of the Law of Armed Conflict. Beyond these requirements, the IDF puts great efforts and resources into minimizing the possibility of harm to civilians that results from the use of such weaponry – for instance, by imposing stringent limitations on the use of certain weapons (including high-explosive artillery) in populated areas.
The 2014 war started after Hamas broke a ceasefire and launched multiple rockets into Israel aimed at civilian neighborhoods. Israel evacuated the Gaza Strip in 2005 in hopes that the territory would be used to create a moderate coastal enclave. Instead, Hamas took over and has since utilized Gaza to build an enormous terrorist infrastructure – much of which utilizes civilian zones, including terror tunnels that snake under cities. Palestinian jihadist groups, including Hamas, have used Gaza to stage attacks against Israeli cities.
On Wednesday, the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), the oldest pro-Israel group in the country, released an analysis of McMaster’s policies and reported views, concluding that he should be reassigned outside the NSC after it found that McMaster may be undermining Trump’s stated national security agenda.
The analysis states:
We find it hard to understand how someone who clearly has animus toward Israel, who supports the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, who opposes calling out radical Islamist terrorists, who fires Trump loyalists and supporters of Israel and opponents of Iran, who hires those opposed to President Trump’s policies especially on Israel and Iran, who refused to acknowledge that the Western Wall is in Israel, who opposes Israeli counterterrorism measures, and who shuts down joint U.S. counterterrorism programs that are of enormous value to U.S. security, can faithfully serve President Trump as top national security advisor. President Trump made it crystal clear, both before and since his election, that supporting Israel and the U.S.-Israel alliance, abrogating or at least vigorously enforcing the Iran deal while calling out and sanctioning Iran’s violations, confronting radical Islamist terrorism, and draining the Washington swamp were key, distinguishing policies of his administration.
The ZOA’s analysis cited Breitbart News articles from this reporter on McMaster’s background.
Earlier this week, Breitbart News reported that McMaster served at a UK-based think tank financed by a controversial, George Soros-funded group identified by the Obama White House as central in helping to sell the Iran nuclear deal to the public and news media.
From September 2006 to February 2017, McMaster was listed as a member of International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where he served as consulting senior fellow. The IISS describes itself as a “world-leading authority on global security, political risk and military conflict.”
Breitbart also reported that IISS is bankrolled by multinational corporate firms doing billions of dollars in business in Iran.
And IISS quietly took in about $32.5 million in funding from Bahrain, a country whose constitution explicitly enshrines Sharia Islamic law as its governing doctrine, Breitbart News documented.
The funding from Bahrain, a repressive regime with a dismal human rights track record but also an important regional U.S. ally, reportedly amounted to one quarter of the think tank’s total income.
A significant portion of the Bahraini funding reportedly pays for the think tank’s annual conference in Bahrain, the Mamana Dialogue. The original agreement between IISS and Bahrain to finance the conference contained a clause calling for the memorandum of understanding to remain confidential, according to the document, which was leaked by a watchdog and published by the Guardian newspaper last year.
As a member of IISS, McMaster participated in the Sixth Mamana Dialogue summit in Bahrain from December 11 to December 13, 2009, Breitbart News found. He is listed in IISS literature as being part of the Mamana Dialogue’s four-person panel that year on “military transformation, intelligence and security cooperation.”
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.
This article was written with additional research by Joshua Klein.
Obama Operatives Sabotage Trumps Presidency As AG Sessions Closes In On The Clinton Crime Family