VIDEO Muslim Rebels Were Behind The Chemical Attack – Trump Fulfilling a 2013 Agreement where Obama Did Not?

What The Media Is Not Telling You About Who Is Behind The Chemical Attack

April 7, 2017 By Walid Shoebat

So what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media? Lets examine footage never seen before in the West and the evidence regarding the latest chemical attack narrative from Syria to see who really is behind these alleged ‘chemical attacks’.

Firstly, lets start with the politics. It was Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who has called on US President Donald Trump to back up his harsh words against Syria with actions, following the deadly chemical attack this week that left scores of people, including children dead.

“Trump said it was impossible to close your eyes against the Assad regime’s hateful actions. Thank you, but don’t limit yourself to comments, we need action,” Erdogan told Turkey’s Kanal 7 television.

“If it truly is a matter of actions, then Turkey is ready to take its responsibilities. We will not back down,” he said.

It was former US president Barack Obama who had also warned Syria that chemical attacks in the country’s civil war would cross a “red line”, but later refrained from taking military action against the regime.

As we stated several times, in the U.S. parties change but foreign policy doesn’t. So Trump complied to the Islamist’s request from Turkey by sending cruise missiles which were fired from a U.S. Navy vessel in the Mediterranean Sea. Their target was the airfield which serves as the base for the warplanes suspected of carrying out the chemical attack.

Two Republican senators are calling on President Donald Trump to take out Syria’s air force as part of a swift and forceful response.

“Hit this guy,” Graham said of Assad. “You’ve got my full permission.” John McCain of Arizona, who spoke to Trump on Wednesday, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said in a statement Thursday that Syrian President Bashar Assad “has crossed a line” and “must pay a punitive cost for this horrific attack.”

But what is the truth from the ground and what is going to be the results of all of this. Here, in Syria demonstrators that condemn the alleged chemical attack shout Al-Sha’b yurid Khilafa Islamiyeh. English: “the people want an Islamic Caliphate”:

But what is the truth behind this chemical attack that never circulates the western media that we obtained from Middle Eastern sources?

Khan Sheikhoun, where the attack happened was a hewn mountain with tunnels and impenetrable bunkers. Definitely a major hiding place for manufacturing weapon supplies for the Islamist rebels on a major scale. It is a “warehouse used to both produce and store shells containing toxic gas” as Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major-General Igor Konashenkov said.

Photos of the place and a video combines both scenes from the attack. The old previous footage from Qatari TV aired on Al-Jazeera TV shows the inside of this fortress which no western media covered reveals this is a major weapon manufacturing depot:

The warehouse was used to both produce and store shells containing toxic gas. John Gilbert, a senior science fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, said the victims seen in video and photographs from Khan Sheikhoun “showed symptoms consistent with the nerve agent sarin.” Doctors Without Borders, which supports medical clinics in rebel-held areas, said Wednesday that eight patients brought to Bab Al Hawa hospital, located near the Turkish border, had exhibited symptoms “consistent with exposure to a neurotoxic agent such as sarin gas or similar compounds.”

A number of opposition activists in Khan Sheikhoun said their groups had had no rebel weapons facilities, though the town has long been a target of government warplanes.

However, Syrian journalist Nizar Nayouf quoted an unnamed doctor who told him there had been a storage area for the rebels in town.

“It contained a workshop … a section to store weapons and ammunition, and even foodstuffs and medical as well as logistical equipment,” said Nayouf in a message on social media Wednesday.

Indeed, the old footage of the same place filmed by Qatari media which you have seen above reveals exactly that.

Early U.S. assessments showed the use of chlorine gas and traces of the nerve agent sarin in the attack.

But who is the U.S. defending in their retaliation on Syria’s government and who is supplying these false narratives?

They are defending Jaysh al-Islam (Arabic meaning Army of Islam), formerly known as Liwa al-Islam (Brigade of Islam). This is a coalition of Islamist and Salafist units involved in the Syrian Civil War. The group along with Ahrar ash-Sham are the main rebel groups supported by Saudi Arabia. Liwa al-Islam was established by Zahran Alloush, the son of Saudi-based religious scholar Mohammed Alloush who is currently residing in Turkey and is aided by it.

One clue that reveal these knew of the attack prior to it happening was that Alloush blundered a tweet showing about the types of symptoms caused by the gas claiming it caused “heart failure for five hours”. It is possible however to have a coma because of the inhalation of chlorine gas and other chemicals. How he knew what chemical agent was used before any investigation remains a mystery.

Also, another source of these leaked reports is the social media accounts of Syrian propaganda journalist Feras Karam, who writes for the Syrian oppositionist website Orient News. Karam before the day of the attack tweeted all journalists to prep for the major media campaign to expose Syria’s use of chemical attacks. How would he have known of an impending attack prior to the event remains a mystery.

Text of the tweet states “tomorrow is the campaign coverage the extent of the air raids in Hama and the use of poisonous chlorine against civilians” Dated April 3, 7:06 PM. This was definitely before when the chemical incident happened.

All this plus other reports reveal Turkey was involved:

So now we come to the million dollar question that no serious ‘analyst’ can answer. The Syrian government has achieved significant gains, while its rebel adversaries are largely in disarray. It has taken back the cities of Aleppo and Homs, and was on the cusp of negotiating issues of aid and reconstruction with world powers under the aegis of the U.N. Assad was getting a clean slate. Why would Assad risk it all by carrying out a chemical attack?

Or is it that the rebels were done with and they needed an ace from under Turkey’s sleeve? In fact, just last week reported on how the US military, working in conjunction with Islamic rebel forces, has been blocking Syrian troops from attacking ISIS held territory. And now, a week later, the US attacks Syria. Coincidence? You decide. The same policies that were conducted in the last administration are being continued in the current one. Why? Because its part of a plan that was configured by the CIA all the way back in the 80s (more on this in a future article).

 As I wrote in 2014, the taking out of Soviet influenced leaders — such a Saddam — was planned out years in advance, before even George W. Bush was president. According to US Army General Wesley Clark, in 1991, Paul Wolfowitz told him that the US had 5-10 years to “clean up those old Soviet client regimes, Syria, Iran, Iraq, before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us.” 

Clinton was president when this plan was being discussed, and when Bush was in office, Saddam was toppled. Under Obama, Gaddafi and Mubarak were taken out, and the Assad regime was greatly diminished. Again, the change of presidency did not alter policy. We did a video to demonstrate that in America, presidents change, policy doesn’t.

Was Chemical Attack in Syria a “False Flag” to Trigger U.S. War?

April 7, 2017  by 

Was Chemical Attack in Syria a “False Flag” to Trigger U.S. War?

While there is no proof yet either way, there are good reasons to at least consider the prospect that the sarin gas attack on civilians in Syria this week could have been a “false flag” operation. The last time Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad supposedly used chemical weapons, the story quickly collapsed under scrutiny. The more likely scenario, according to United Nations investigators and virtually every credible analyst who looked at the 2013 crime, was that globalist-backed jihadist “rebels” used the chemicals in a “false-flag” scheme. The goal: Blame Syrian authorities in a bid to trigger U.S. government intervention against Assad.

Foreign officials and more than a few prominent analysts have suggested the same deception may have just played out once again, albeit more successfully this time. Former Congressman and longtime non-interventionist Ron Paul, for example, declared that there was “zero chance” that Assad had ordered the chemical attack. “It doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poisonous gases,” he said, noting that the situation for Assad and his regime was looking better until the chemical attack this week. In a tweet that sparked headlines around the world, Paul called the attack a “false flag.”

Syrian officials were among the first to allege that a false-flag operation was underway in the chemical attack that killed over 100 civilians in northern Syria this week. In a statement released by the Assad regime’s Foreign Ministry, authorities denied responsibility for the deadly attack. Instead, the regime said the gruesome killings with banned weapons were actually a “premeditated action that aimed to justify the launching of a U.S. attack on the Syrian army.” The regime claims it destroyed all its WMDs under United Nations supervision years ago. Russian authorities, allied with Assad, agreed.

Of course, even if Damascus did use chemical weapons on civilians, it would be unlikely to admit that. But a simple analysis of motives — a basic first step in any serious investigation — would suggest that Assad had every reason to avoid the use of chemical weapons at all costs. On the other hand, jihadist rebels on the verge of annihilation had every reason to use them. After years of fighting globalist-backed jihadists and terrorists, the dictatorship in Damascus was reportedly close to victory — at least until Trump intervened by firing dozens of missiles at Syrian targets.

Russian authorities, which have stood by Assad in the war against jihadist groups backed by Western governments and Sunni dictatorships, echoed the claims of Syrian officials and blasted certain globalist governments for being “obsessed” with regime change in Syria. Kremlin officials suggested that a strike by Assad’s war planes in the rebel-held area hit a jihadist weapons-production depot that was manufacturing chemical weapons for terrorists in the region. That explanation would appear to make more sense, multiple analysts said.

Russian officials, also citing intelligence, were unequivocal in explaining what happened. “Yesterday [Tuesday], from 11:30am to 12:30pm local time, Syrian aviation made a strike on a large terrorist ammunition depot and a concentration of military hardware in the eastern outskirts of Khan Sheikhoun town,” Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konoshenkov was quoted as saying in media reports. “On the territory of the depot there were workshops which produced chemical warfare munitions.”

Western governments and supposed “experts” trotted out by establishment propaganda organs promptly ridiculed the claims. Instead, they claimed to have alleged “intelligence” that supposedly showed Assad was guilty. Despite the non-stop videos on TV of dying children from emotional manipulation, the alleged intelligence proving Assad’s guilt was not released to the public. First, the attack had Assad’s “fingerprints” on it, alleged “anonymous” and potentially fake “U.S. intelligence” sources were quoted as saying. Then, there was “no doubt.”

However, when Obama cited alleged “intelligence” purporting to blame Assad for a similar 2013 attack, a very similar situation unfolded. Top Obama officials claimed with certainty that their “intelligence” proved Assad was guilty. But as the days, weeks, and months went on, it quickly became evident to virtually every credible analyst that it was, in fact, the Obama-backed jihadist rebels who had used chemical weapons in a bid to set up Assad’s regime for elimination via international intervention. Only a massive outcry by Americans and Congress stopped the plot.

But the evidence showing what really happened was clear. A 2014 MIT report and analysis on that attack the year prior, for example, offered evidence that the Obama administration almost certainly used deception and bogus “intelligence” in its failed bid to more deeply embroil the United States and its military in Syria’s ongoing war. Entitled “Possible Implications of Faulty U.S. Technical Intelligence,” the report found the nerve-agent attack in Syria “could not possibly” have come from the center or even the Eastern edge of regime-controlled territory. Other evidence also showed that the rebels, not the regime, deployed the chemical weapons.

Citing “egregious errors in the intelligence,” the explosive MIT report warned that the process by which those errors were made must be rectified to avoid future tragedy. “If the source of these errors is not identified, the procedures that led to this intelligence failure will go uncorrected, and the chances of a future policy disaster will grow with certainty,” concluded the authors, former United Nations weapons inspector Richard Lloyd and MIT Science, Technology, and National Security Policy Professor Theodore Postol. It seems likely that the warning went unheeded, and many of the same “Deep State” operatives behind the previous scam remain employed in the federal bureaucracy.

U.S. officials already knew that the jihadist “rebels” had access to chemical weapons at the time of that 2013 attack, too. A classified U.S. military document obtained by WND the month after the attack confirmed that al-Qaeda-led fighters with the “rebel” Jabhat al-Nusra Front in Syria, which top officials admitted was supported and armed by Obama’s “coalition,” were in possession of sarin gas. U.S. officials knew that because about five pounds of the toxic gas was confiscated from the terror group earlier that same year by authorities in Turkey.

And after the previous use of chemical weapons in Syria, which Obama claimed was perpetrated by Assad, even UN investigators concluded “rebels” were responsible. “Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of Sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated,” said Carla Del Ponte, the former attorney general of Switzerland and a member of the UN independent commission of inquiry on Syria. “This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.”

According to a January 29, 2013, article published by leading British newspaper the Daily Mail, the Obama administration actually backed a scheme to have jihadist rebels use chemical weapons — and then blame it on Assad. The article, which received widespread publicity at the time but has since been deleted for reasons that remain unclear, pointed to an alleged leaked e-mail from defense contractor Britam. The December, 2012, document in question refers to chemical weapons and claims the scheme is “approved by Washington.”

Ironically, certain Western governments, as well as establishment and globalist war propaganda organs, pretended to be shocked at the mere mention of the term false flag following the latest attack. However, more than a few establishment sources suggested the recent terrorist attack in St. Petersburg, Russia, may have been just such an event. Putin’s regime has previously been accused — credibly — of having staged such attacks as a pretext to advance certain policies. But the double standard is glaring. How establishment propaganda organs can be so sure that designated terror groups and jihadists — or rogue Western bureaucrats — would not perpetrate a false flag was not explained.

Just last month, though, left-wing extremist Noam Chomsky suggested President Trump might stage a false-flag terrorist attack to rally his supporters and distract from his failure to follow through on his promises. “We shouldn’t put aside the possibility that there would be some kind of staged or alleged terrorist act, which can change the country instantly,” Chomsky declared, with establishment media voices dutifully reporting the remarks by the “left-wing intellectual” as if they were perfectly sane and reasonable. A false-flag attack by an embattled jihadist terror group in Syria with nothing left to lose is almost certainly a more likely possibility than a false flag by Trump to rally supporters.

Already, smoking-gun evidence exists proving that the globalist establishment was willing to facilitate unspeakable crimes to remove Assad from power. In fact, the Obama administration, Sunni Muslim dictators, and others were so determined to achieve regime change that they were willing to support a rebellion that they knew was led by al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, according to a 2012 U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency document. That same document outlines an illegal plot to help create a “salafist principality” — known today as the Islamic State, or ISIS — in Eastern Syria to destabilize Assad. Trump is well aware of this scheme. And top Obama officials admitted it in public.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), among America’s most prominent lawmakers, has taken what may be the most sensible approach to the issue: Demanding to see the evidence. Speaking of Assad, Paul said “he’s either the dumbest dictator in the world, or it may be more confusing.” Speaking on The Laura Ingraham Show, the senator noted the obvious: It would not make sense for Assad to use such weapons when he was winning the war, had strong Russian support, and had already learned that the Trump administration was abandoning the Obama administration’s failed “regime change” scheming. “I would like to see the evidence,” Paul added, saying he did not dispute it but would like to see it.

To the horror of some of Trump’s most loyal and important supporters, many of the same establishment-globalist institutions such as the Council on Foreign Relations that dominated Obama’s warmongering administration have burrowed their way into Trump’s administration, too. And that is despite Trump’s oft-repeated promise to fight against globalism, the warmongering establishment, and other evils. The Trump administration should present whatever evidence it has about the source of the latest attack to Congress and the public. That way, Americans and their representatives can judge the facts for themselves instead of relying on warmongering “deep state” bureaucrats and their discredited propagandists in the establishment media.

Photo of victims of chemical attack in Syria: AP Images

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU or on Facebook. He can be reached at

Related articles:

Citing Possible False Flag, Trump Launches Illegal War on Syria

MIT Report: Obama Used Bogus Intelligence to Push Syria War

U.S. Military Document: Syrian Rebels Had Chemical Weapons

UN Investigator Claims Evidence Syrian Rebels Used Sarin Gas

Obama Redux? Trump Sends Marines, Rangers Into Syria

Some of Trump’s Picks Have Troubling Links to Globalism, CFR

U.S. Defense Intel Chief: Obama Gave “Willful” Aid to Al-Qaeda

Globalists Using Muslim Terrorists as Pawns

U.S. Intel: Obama Coalition Supported Islamic State in Syria

ISIS: The Best Terror Threat U.S. Tax Money Can Buy

Doubts Grow About Perpetrators Behind Chemical Attack in Syria

Syria Tells Russia that Rebels Used Chemicals

Reports: U.S.-led Rebels Sent into Syria Before Chemical Attack

Rebel Atrocities in Syria Escalate, Sparking Alarm Over Obama Plan

U.S.-backed Syrian Opposition Linked to Bilderberg, CFR, Goldman Sachs & George Soros

Ex-UK Ambassador: Assad wasn’t behind the chemical attack

BREAKING NEWS TRUMP 4/7/17: How is China & Russia perceiving the strikes on Syria?

Ron Paul on Syria gas attack: ‘It doesn’t make sense. Zero chance Assad did this.’

Russia Warns Of All Out War As MSM Attacks Official Story Doubters

The Secrets Behind Trump’s Syria Strike

The Truth About Trump’s Air Strike on Syria

False Flag Attack Started Syria US Conflict: Alex Jones Reports

DEBATE: Syria Strike – Genius or Lunacy?


The more things change the more they stay the same

Apr 8, 2017

InfoWars takes a look back at the first chemical attack in Syria in 2013 and compares it to the latest attack in 2017.

Also watch Darrin McBreen and Rob Dew’s breakdown on How To Recognize War Propaganda:


“We are prepared to do more, but we hope it will not be necessary.”

April 8, 2017

The United States on Friday threatened to take further military action in Syria following its missile strikes on an air base in the war-wracked country in retaliation for a suspected chemical attack.“The United States took a very measured step last night,” US Ambassador Nikki Haley told the UN Security Council.“We are prepared to do more, but we hope it will not be necessary.”The Security Council was meeting in an emergency session to discuss the US actions in Syria that Russia branded a “flagrant violation of international law and an act of aggression” against Syria.

Read more

WATCH: Syrian Chemical Attack: The Sequel

Cruise Missile Strikes Were A Statement to China

Chilling To the Bone-Recorded 45 Minutes Before Trump’s Strike! God’s Timing Is Amazing!

Apr 7, 2017
This message was recorded literally 30-45 minutes before the announcement of Trump’s Syrian missile strike! You won’t believe your ears! FACEBOOK COMMENT ABOUT THIS VIDEO: Maryann Roberts said-This interview Lyn Leahz did with Nathan Leal is awesome. The extraordinarily crucial timing of this report, in my humble opinion, was divinely orchestrated. May JESUS CHRIST prompt many to take the time to hear it and His saints help to make it go viral on you tube.

You can visit Nathan, see this link here
Visit Lyn Leahz at



Related previous posts on this blog


About ror1774

This Blog is for modern day Patriots who want to Reclaim Our Republic and put it on the right path with a foundation of our Constitution and our Creator God.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to VIDEO Muslim Rebels Were Behind The Chemical Attack – Trump Fulfilling a 2013 Agreement where Obama Did Not?

  1. Pingback: VIDEO Muslim Rebels Were Behind The Chemical Attack – Trump Fulfilling a 2013 Agreement where Obama Did Not? | zooforyou

  2. Assad is against ISIS. Trump will be for ISIS being against Assad. Think about that Trump. Don’t be divided against yourself.


  3. Don’t ever honor Muslims even when a Muslim calls himself a king. They are like the people who God killed and instructed people to kill. They do honor killings. Muslims Allah permits cannibalism. That is sick. I am an expert on Muslims.


  4. marysong says:

    If Assad is taken down, Sunni terror will rain on those poor people. Sad! It is a tragedy that President Trump can’t be informed on this. CIA will never let that happen. Prayers are needed big time.


  5. Brittius says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.


  6. Pingback: #Syrie : la vérité sur l’attaque chimique pourrait être bien différente de la version présentée par les gouvernements et les médias occidentaux | Autrement qu'être Mathesis uni∜ersalis Problema Universale Heidegger/Husserl être/consc

  7. Pingback: VIDEO Stealing The March: Strikes On Syria A Carefully Devised Strategic Move – A reawakening of America the great | Reclaim Our Republic

  8. Pingback: VIDEO Syrian survivor destroys CNN for years of silence; Trump’s a hero, where were YOU? – RINO Warmongers | Reclaim Our Republic

  9. Pingback: Pentagon Trained Syria’s Al Qaeda “Rebels” in Use of Chemical Weapons – How False Flag Set Up | Reclaim Our Republic

  10. Pingback: US Intel: Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Launched From SAUDI Base | Reclaim Our Republic

  11. Pingback: VIDEO Email Hillary Told “Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria” – Assad: US ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Attack | Reclaim Our Republic

  12. Pingback: VIDEO U.S. Planning More Fake Gas Attacks to Justify Missile Strikes -Top 10 – Mossad, Saudis Behind Syrian False Flag | Reclaim Our Republic

  13. Pingback: VIDEO Soros Undermines Trump Through Kushner, As Trump and Tillerson Go After Soros – Kushner and Bannon | Reclaim Our Republic

  14. Pingback: Meet the Lawyer Who’s Suing Saudi Arabia for Financing the 9/11 Attacks | Reclaim Our Republic

  15. Pingback: No Full On War Is Syria, This Is NOT A Bush White House – No Policy Change – More, Gas Attack Staged | Reclaim Our Republic

  16. Pingback: VIDEO MIT expert latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged, no link to Assad | Reclaim Our Republic

  17. Pingback: CIA Docs Reveal Plans To Oust Assad, Destroy Syria For Oil Pipeline – Why CIA Dir Must Resign | Reclaim Our Republic

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s