The more hysterical liberals become about Russia, the more your antennae should go up.
Their selective misgivings with Russia are just like their selective alarm with (our ally) Chiang Kai-shek, leader of the nationalist Chinese government, and (our ally) Ngo Dinh Diem, president of South Vietnam.
As explained in lavish detail in Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, liberals instinctively lunge toward treason.
They say Putin is a “thug” and a “bully” who kills journalists. Liberals never used to mind Russian leaders killing journalists. Nor millions of scientists, writers, Christians, Jews, kulaks, Ukrainians and the entire 1980 Soviet Olympic hockey team.
Have you guys heard of the Evil Empire? Now Democrats are hypersensitive to a Russian leader’s flaws?
Liberals were cool with the show trials, the alliance with Hitler, the gulags, the forced starvations, the shooting down of American planes and goose-stepping through Eastern Europe.
But that was when the Russian leader was Joseph Stalin or Nikita Khrushchev — not the beast Putin!
Back then, liberals were spying for Stalin (Julius Rosenberg’s code name: “Liberal”), the U.S. president was calling the bloodthirsty dictator “Uncle Joe,” and The New York Times was covering up Stalin’s infamous crimes. In the storied history of fake news, the Times’ Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his false reports denying the Ukrainian famine, in which more than 7 million people were deliberately starved to death.
As far as the Times is concerned, those were Russia’s halcyon days!
Back when Russia was actually threatening America with nuclear annihilation, Jimmy Carter warned Americans about their “inordinate fear of communism.” Sting sang that “the Russians love their children, too.”
But now liberals are hopping mad with Putin. They could never forgive Russia for giving up communism.
To add insult to injury, Putin embraced the Russian Orthodox Church! This was deeply offensive to fiercely Christophobic liberals.
Russia’s descent into insanity and madness was clear when Putin refused to allow LGBTQ marches through Red Square. For having the same position on gays as Obama did, circa 2008, Russkies were walking on the fighting side of liberals!
Trump’s election victory was the capstone of the left’s rage with Putin. To explain the inexplicable, Putin was made the center of liberals’ axis of evil, the mastermind of a malevolent plot to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.
That’s how liberals became born-again John Birchers, seeing Russians under every bed. Now, no fear of Russia is inordinate. The Russians do NOT love their children, too.
We really could have used some of this fighting spirit about 50 years ago when the Soviet Union sought total world domination and Stalin’s spies were crawling through the U.S. government. But back then, liberals were blackening the names of Whittaker Chambers, Richard Nixon and Sen. Joe McCarthy. (Later proved 100 percent correct by the top-secret Venona Project.)
Russia’s loss of the left’s esteem happened very quickly. In 2008, The New York Times editorial page demanded that Obama “signal to the Russians that he wants better relations,” and complained of the “alarming” deterioration of “Russian-American relations” under Bush.
It was considered the height of statesmanship when Obama was caught on a hot-mic in 2012, telling Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility. I understand you.”
To hoots of laughter at the Democratic National Convention, Obama said: “You don’t call Russia our number one enemy — not Al-Qaida, Russia — unless you’re still stuck in a Cold War mind warp.”
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow couldn’t contain her hilarity over the GOP offering “an extra bonus of threatening Russia.”
But today, Democrats (and two especially showboating Republicans) are horrified that Trump wants to get along with Russia. Tonight, the threatening evil of Vladimir Putin will be the top issue on Rachel Maddow’s show, assuming she still has a show. (Maybe she can get a copy of Putin’s tax returns!)
When the same people who hailed Stalin as a beloved American ally are happy to threaten Putin with thermonuclear war, we may deduce that the left’s newfound Russia-phobia has some seditious objective.
Historically, liberals show their manliness by demanding war with our friends and allies, while methodically undermining America’s ability to fight the wars it’s already in.
The No. 1 enemy of Western civilization today isn’t non-communist Russia. It’s Islam.
And who is a key ally in that fight? Russia has been dealing with these troublesome Muslims for centuries. It was Russian officials who tried in vain to warn our blind, incompetent government about the Boston Marathon bombers.
The left’s hysteria about Russia isn’t just an attempt to delegitimize Trump. It’s the usual Christophobic fifth column rooting for the Islamization of the West.
RINO McCain: Rand Is ‘Working for Vladimir Putin’
During a speech on the Senate floor on Wednesday, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) stated that Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) is “achieving the objectives of” and “working for” Vladimir Putin after Paul objected to a unanimous consent motion to advance a bill to advance Montenegro’s bid to join NATO.
McCain said, “If there is objection, you are achieving the objectives of Vladimir Putin. You’re achieving the objectives of trying to dismember this small country that has already been the subject of [an] attempted coup. I have no idea why anyone would object to this, except that I will say, if they object, they are now carrying out the desires and ambitions of Vladimir Putin, and I do not say that lightly.”
McCain then asked for unanimous consent to advance the bill, which Paul objected to. McCain then stated, “I note the senator from Kentucky leaving the floor without justification, or rather — or any rationale for the action that he has just taken. That is really remarkable, that a senator, blocking a treaty, that is supported by the overwhelming number, perhaps 98, at least, of his colleagues, would come to the floor, and object, and walk away, and walk away. The only conclusion you can draw, when he walks away, is he has no argument to be made. He has no justification, for his objection to having a small nation be part of NATO that is under assault from the Russians. So I repeat again, the senator from Kentucky is now working for Vladimir Putin.”
(h/t Daily Beast)
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
Hillary’s Campaign People Are Russian Intelligence Agents- Irrefutable Proof!
Mar 15, 2017 by Dave Hodges
Previously, I accused Hillary Clinton of being a Russian spy. The accusation and subsequent article received moderate attention. However, there have been new developments and it is time to repeat the charge with even more information.
The Russians Are Coming
It is ironic that the Deep State is accusing anyone who opposes them as being Russian subversives, including yours truly courtest of the Washington (Com) Post.
As I stated, the article I wrote alleging that Clinton was a spy, gained moderate attention. However, there is more evidence that has come to light.
Hillary Was “Friendly” with the Russians During the Campaign
There are multiple reports that the Clinton people met with members of the Russian diplomatic Corps during the campaign in exactly the same manner as happened with the Trump people. The House Intelligence Committee is meeting on March 20 to further accuse President Trump of being a Russian operative. The CIA will be a part of these hearings, which I find outrageous since they are the source of leaks of classified information designed to damage the Trump administration. However, this is quickly becoming a case of the kettle calling the pot black, for Clinton, as it is now revealed, that she engaged in the same activities by meeting with Russian officials during the campaign as they are accusing Trump’s people of doing. This serves to further reinforce the fact that she has no loyalty to the United States and this includes key members of the DNC as well.
“Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov (Press Secretary to Putin), revealed that not only did Donald Trump’s team meet with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, but so too did Hillary Clinton staff hold meetings with the Russian diplomat.
The Telegraph UK reported that Trump-Russia “fake news” being spread by mainstream media is the revelation that the HRC campaign was also meeting with Russian officials as
“We don’t have a proper understanding of the future,” he said. “We certainly would expect our contacts to be more frequent, more in depth, because we had quite a significant pause.
“We were losing potential by blaming everything on Earth on each other.
“We do worry. Public opinion – if you load with a huge burden of fake news, fake blaming on Russia, repeat every day numerous times that Russia is interfering, guilty of trying to hack, that everything that goes wrong in the country is the fault of Russia.
“We want to see this hysteria coming to its logic end. Better sooner than later.”
The Establishment’s and Rockefeller controlled, Coiuncil on Foreign Relations, through its mouthpiece, the Foreign Policy has already taken the position that Mrs. Clinton’s staff did not meet with the Russians at anytime durng the campaign. This is a key piece of evidence that further reveals the Deep state plot designed to bring down the President.
Further, I find it interestingthe Ambassador Churkin’s autopsy results will not be released. If he only died of a heart attack, then what is the big deal? What are the “athorities” hiding”. Given the fact that the Clinton has now been shown to be guilty of the same thing that she is accusing Trump of doing, I am very suspicious of the decision to not release the autopsy results. makes me wonder if this is another “weight-lifting accident”.
In fact, seven Russian Diploamts have recently died. What do they know that certain people don’t want revealed? My answer to the question would be to answer with this question with another question. What is presently the biggest scandal in America?
Not only is Clinton gulty of what the Deep State and their political minions are alleging about Donald Trump, but this is part of a very disturbing pattern of behavior in which the Clintons and their Foundation have been uncomfortably cozy with the Russians. A simple review of the facts would reveal that the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation and major players in the DNC are not loyal to America. They will commit treason all in the name of getting ahead. No, this is not Dave Hodges saying this, initially, it ts the Global Research organization, which does not share many poliical opinions with The Common Sense Show.
Global Research Declares Clinton to be Foreign Spy
When one considers the source, Global Research, this is about as a damning indictment of the treason that surroudns the Cllinton’s that exists:
From Global Research:
During her 4 years as Secretary of State of the United States (2009-2014), Hillary Clinton controlled US foreign policy. She had access to the most confidential information and state documents, numbering in the tens of thousands, from all of the major government departments and agencies, Intelligence, FBI, the Pentagon, Treasury and the office of the President.
She had unfettered access to vital and secret information affecting US policy in all the key regions of the empire…”
“…There are several lines of inquiry against Mme. Clinton:
(1) Did she work with, as yet unnamed, foreign governments and intelligence services to strengthen their positions and against the interest of the United States?
(2) Did she provide information on the operations and policy positions of various key US policymakers to competitors, adversaries or allies undermining the activities of military, intelligence and State Department officials?
(3) Did she seek to enhance her personal power within the US administration to push her aggressive policy of serial pre-emptive wars over and against veteran State Department and Pentagon officials who favored traditional diplomacy and less violent confrontation?
(4) Did she prepare a ‘covert team’, using foreign or dual national operative, to lay the groundwork for her bid for the presidency and her ultimate goal of supreme military and political power? (Ed. Note: My assertion)
Clinton’s covert war policies, which included the violent overthrow of the elected Ukraine government, were carried out by her ‘Lieutenant’ Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, a virulent neo-conservative holdover from the previous Bush Administration and someone committed to provoking Russia and to enhancing Israel’s power in the Middle East. Clinton’s highly dangerous and economically destabilizing ‘brainchild’ of militarily encircling China, the so-called ‘pivot to Asia’, would have required clandestine exchanges with elements in the Pentagon – out of the State Department and possibly Executive oversight.
In other words, within the Washington political circuit, Former Secretary of State Clinton’s escalation of nuclear war policies toward Russia and China required secretive correspondences which would not necessarily abide with the policies and intelligence estimates of other US government agencies and with private business interests…” (EDITOR’S NOTE: I MAINTAIN THAT THIS ISSUE IS ALSO CONTAINED IN THE “MISSING EMAILS”).
My main interest toward Hillary Clinton’s treason has recently focused on one issue, namely, the Clinton Foundation’s selling uranium to Russia. I would argue that Clinton’s policies which pushed the US into a war mode against Russia was done so Clinton would have a willing buyer of uranium (i.e. Russia) should war every come.
Again, from Global Research:
“The executive leadership now faces the problem of how to deal with a traitor, who (at that time) (was) is the Democratic Party nominee for US President, without undermining the US quest for global power. How do the executive leadership and intelligence agencies back a foreign spy for president, who has been deeply compromised and can be blackmailed? This may explain why the FBI, NSA, and CIA hesitate to press charges; hesitate to even seriously investigate, despite the obvious nature of her offenses. Most of all it explains why there is no indication of the identity of Secretary Clinton’s correspondents in the various reports so far available”…
Hillary Clinton: An Agent for Russia
I published my assertion that Clinton was a traitor in 2015. I repeated this charge nearly five months ago.
A former key member of the Obama administration and current Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has proven herself to be the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. You may recall your U.S. history as Ethel Rosenberg sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. In an act every bit as egregious as Ethel Rosenberg’s treason, Hillary Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State. Ironically, the original source on this treasonous act committed by Clinton was none other than the ultra-liberal fake news rag we call the New York Times.
The proof is undeniable that Hillary Clinton committed the treasonous act of selling uranium to the Russians while Secretary of State, as reported in the New York Times. The Russian blood money, as reported, is being held in an offshore account and is being used to fund her run for the Presidency.
From the New York Times….
“A Uranium One sign that points to a 35,000 acre ranch by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyoming. Uranium One has the mining rights Mr. Christensen’s property.” This is proof of more BLM chicanery which will involve multiple BLM ranches.
The New York Times further asserts that members of the Canadian mining industry, who have supported Clinton’s campaign, financed and sold off to the Russians a company known as Uranium One. Uranium One is directly responsible for transferring uranium from BLM land to the Russians through an off-shore holding company. Again, according to the NY Times, the Russians, through three separate transactions, acquired Uranium One, while paying off the Clintons and their Canadian partners from 2009-2013. The business deal also involved paying Bill Clinton $500,000 dollars for a speech on energy which was delivered in Moscow.
WHO NEEDS TO LOOK AT 33,000 CLASSIFIED EMAILS BEING TRANSMITTED ON CLINTON’S PRIVATE COMPUTER WHEN WE HAVE THIS KIND OF EVIDENCE. HOW ABOUT THIS FAKE NEWS MAINSTREAM MEDIA? IT IS HARD TO ACCUSE THE COMMON SENSE SHOW OF BEING FAKE NEWS WHEN WE ARE CITING THE NEW YORK TIMES.
But wait, there’s more…..
NEW Evidence That the Clinton Campaign Team Are Acting As Russian Intelligence Agents
I must have a very large staff with unlimited resources with a very large collection of reporters. Therefore, I cannot blame CNN, the Washington (com) Post and the New York Times for not being able to uncover this story in its entirety.
The truth of the matter is that I have a staff of one and my budget is slightly more solvent the Social Security fund. If a staff of one can uncover this massive conspiracy to commit treason against the United States, how deep does the actual conspiracy go? It goes as deep….very deep…. as deep as the Deep State.
The Trump people need to go on the offensive. This information should dominate Twitter, by the end of this day. Meanwhile, you can help the Trump adminnistration by making this type of information go viral.
Michael Savage: If The United States Falls To Globalism The USSA Will Enslave The Planet