Why Does the Corp Media Favor Criminals over Law Abiding Americans? – ‘Free Press’ Sycophantic Role

Why Does the Corp Media Favor Criminals over Law Abiding Americans?

daniella vargas

Mar 7, 2017  By Lynn Jolly

The liberal mainstream media continues to focus the wrong aspect of most of President Trump’s policies. They intentionally ignore the truth, then twist the news in such a way as to vilify the Trump instead of criminals – people who have broken our nation’s laws.

During the presidential campaign last year, the media lambasted Donald Trump every time he pointed out that Hillary Clinton violated laws or acted unethically, even though the evidence was overwhelming. Instead of vilifying Clinton for her highly questionable actions, they went after Trump for mentioning them publicly.

During the reign of Barack Obama, many conservatives accused Obama of failing to protect the United States by not securing the border or fully enforcing the nation’s immigration laws. When many small hospitals and urgent care facilities within 100 miles of the Mexican border because they could no longer afford to provide free medical care to the thousands of illegal aliens in the area, the mainstream media ignored it. When ranchers near the southern border were threatened at gun point, their homes burglarized, livestock slaughtered, land littered and vandalized, the mainstream media ignored them. When the same ranchers lived in so much fear that they kept a loaded gun with them at all times, even in bed, the mainstream media ignored them.

Worst of all, when some ranchers near the border lived in so much fear from illegal aliens and drug traffickers, that they were forced to send their wives and kids to live with relatives further north, the mainstream media ignored them. When these AMERICAN families were torn apart because of the threats from foreigners illegally entering the US, the mainstream media ignored them.

But when US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest and plan to deport someone who violated American laws, the media is all over the story and vilifying President Trump and ICE officials for breaking up families. What about the American families that have been broken up by the actions and threats of illegal aliens?

Knowing that ICE officials are acting on the orders of the President of the United States and finally enforcing federal immigration laws, you would expect any and all illegals to keep quiet and not draw attention to themselves, especially if they are as educated as we are led to believe.

However, when one illegal decides to speak out against President Trump and then gets arrested, the media is all over the story and guess who they vilify and who they portray is the hero?

According to the media:

“Federal immigration authorities arrested a 22-year-old woman in Jackson, Mississippi, on Wednesday shortly after she spoke to the media about the detention of her family. Law enforcement had initially declined to arrest Daniela Vargas, who was previously granted deportation reprieve under the Obama administration’s deferred action program.”

The Vargas family came to the US illegally 15 years ago, which makes them all criminals and violators of federal law, but the media won’t focus on that aspect. Under Obama’s illegal DACA program, Vargas had been granted permission to remain in the US, but her status had expired.

“When the agents arrived, Vargas had a problem: Her DACA status, which has to be renewed every two years, had expired ― and because of the high cost of renewal, $495, her application had only been received on Feb. 10. (Vargas provided HuffPost with a copy of her receipt.) Scared, Vargas went into her house, locked the door and hid in a closet for hours while she sobbed and called her mother. Eventually, she says, ICE agents forced their way in with a warrant, guns raised. The house was searched ― officers had previously found a gun, which Vargas said the family owned for protection ― and she was handcuffed. As local news reporters arrived, she was eventually released…”

“Vargas told local news outlets about her story. On Wednesday, she spoke at a news conference organized by local immigration advocates to highlight immigrants’ contributions to the community, according to her attorney, Abby Peterson. Afterward, she was pulled over and arrested, and is now being processed by immigration authorities.”

“‘It could be retaliation,’ Peterson said. ‘They had been reading about her in the news, they had seen her at this press conference… [maybe] they didn’t want to hear it anymore. Maybe I’m mistaken on that, but common sense would certainly imply that’s what happened.’ Peterson said that Vargas did not have a criminal record, but had minor traffic offenses.”

“An ICE official said on Wednesday that Vargas was not initially taken into custody on Feb. 15 because she claimed she had DACA status ― but ICE subsequently verified that she did not.”

“Vargas was taken into custody on Wednesday during a ‘targeted immigration enforcement action,’ the official said. A federal immigration judge will now determine whether she is eligible for immigration relief.”

First of all, if Vargas was so worried about being deported, then why did she go to the media and speak out with her story?

Secondly, ask the mainstream media why they ignore American families being terrorized and separated yet focus their attention on foreigners who are in the US illegally and living as law violators?

http://constitution.com/media-favor-criminals-law-abiding-americans/


The Deterioration of the ‘Free Press’ into its Present Sycophantic Role

free press

Ever since Mr. Trump shocked America and turned away Clinton’s Presidential hopes, the scuzzy award has been dusted off and transferred from Reid to Schumer, while America’s so-called ‘free press’ retained its Most Valuable Player status.

Since America’s Founding, her scrutiny from a ‘free press’ has deteriorated, first into a liberal version and then finally into its present sycophantic role.  Today, factual reporting has given way to the emotionalisms of fakery.

Since Trump established his Presidential legitimacy with his State of the Union knockout Address, Schumer and his lock step MSM have been working overtime to degrade the Trump Presidency; beginning with the democrat’s record-setting obstruction of various Cabinet appointees while media elites ridiculed Trump’s every effort.

However, this two-pronged attack has caused a bit of consternation, even within the Clinton’s camp.  Forget the betterment of the country.  Now, what’s vital to protect is the affluence and influence which makes up “the establishment.”

Since January 20th , rather than “a new sheriff,” a new threat has arrived in the personage of President Trump.  While individual democrats remain most energized, do not limit the frowns to one side of the aisle.  Check out the amount of legislation which this republican-led congress has produced along with the Republican split over the Obamacare repeal.  Consider this inactivity from one side versus the obstructionism from the other.

What was headlined for attacking first featured General Flynn and then was refocused upon Attorney General Sessions.  While Flynn’s actions overseas were appropriate, his reporting to higher ups became his undoing.  Then, as the Flynn caper settled, democrat obstructionists reloaded their false volley of smears against our Attorney General; this after undergoing eight years of silence versus two more questionable AG versions.

Revved up from a cheering media, some have turned against Sessions but without any real knowledge of his actions.  Instead, emotions have been heightened to the point of propaganda.

Reviewing the media’s democrat kinship and compliance parallels a dastardly scheme which represents the democrat’s only remaining tool.

On one November evening, throats which were hoarse with anticipating a Clinton victory, suddenly went silent as euphoria waned with each posting of State election results.  Hindsight revealed a general expectation, even an arrogance which became a precursor to the Clinton defeat.  Today, this fact is shielded by another false democrat campaign earmarking Russian interference.

On the other side, Trump never wavered.  During the last full week, candidate Trump barnstormed between five and six appearances daily while Clinton refused to visit crucial States which eventually Trump would claim.

Trump’s win produced finger pointing, name calling and some very despondent media talking heads.  However, fault had to be framed and naturally, few were eager for such recriminations.  So, the best patsy, as previously stated, was that renown enemy Romney cited and which Obama scoffed at back in 2012, Russia.

Representing sufficient distance so that if need be, the unexpected could easily be muffled, Russian election interference became the media’s fancy.  When this hit a roadblock, since all that was uncovered was the vulnerability of Clinton’s unprotected emails, the next alternative was connecting Trump’s staffers with the Russians.

Think about it. This was so much better.  It limited the shenanigans to the republicans while insulating any Clinton/democrat culpability.  First in the crosshairs was Trump’s National Security Advisor, Gen. Flynn.

Again, another roadblock since Flynn’s hands were clean.  However, there was a gift handed to the democrats in the form of Flynn’s reporting to Vice President Pence.  Suffice to say that while the democrats claimed their first scalp, this only teased their blood sport.

However, America then witnessed Sessions’ classy and effective measure to stop the jackals at the door.  There is little doubt that the ultimate prize in the Schumer/media playbook was the AG’s resignation.  However, in true Southern fashion, Sessions cut short the howling jackals by recusal.

Past official actions or lack of such, discolors Schumer’s anti-Trump crusade since similar investigations were glaringly absent when former Secretary of State Clinton lied about the video causing our 9/11 Benghazi losses.  With such incriminating evidence available, how is it that media efforts remained in a state of journalistic paralysis.  Especially so since today, rumor and innuendo abound as talking points and/or headlines.

This era of journalistic fakery was called forth from the ashes of Benghazi and the pressure of re-election.  Over the years, it’s usage has become a finely tuned tactic.  Still, every tactic comes with a shelf life, especially when a new grocer hits town!

http://eaglerising.com/41505/the-deterioration-of-the-free-press-into-its-present-sycophantic-role/


Advertisements

About ror1774

This Blog is for modern day Patriots who want to Reclaim Our Republic and put it on the right path with a foundation of our Constitution and our Creator God.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Why Does the Corp Media Favor Criminals over Law Abiding Americans? – ‘Free Press’ Sycophantic Role

  1. Brittius says:

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s