VIDEO Rescue Christians Wins Court Case To Free Christian Girl From Forced Marriage Contract

On the 23rd May we reported a case of a Christian Girl Shabana Bibi, who was abducted, raped, and forced to convert to Islam including a forced marriage by Muhammad Afzal (the Abductor). Watch her testimony here which we previously published

Even after escaping she was unable to re-start her life as Muhammad Afzal was making every possible effort to regain the custody of this young girl. The Muslim extremists were playing their usual role to protect the “Muslim rights” or more accurately aid and abet their criminal kidnappers and rapists with the courts usually finding in their favor.

Initially the Muslim findamentalist judge Munazza Rana ruled according to Muslim law and told Shabana’s father and our lawyer that “as per Sharia law she had been converted to Islam and was now the lawful wife of Muhammad Afzal.”

Our brilliant and courageous legal team decided to transfer the case to the Family court and on the 23rd June 2016 Judge Shamim Watto ordered a degree against this illegal marriage contract and declared that it was a forced marriage. Shabana is now free from this so-call contract and is in a safe place protected by Rescue Christians. Praise the Lord a victory.

Today G-d has again used us to save one more life from the clutches of Muslim persecution , our work makes us different from others as we believe in real action to save our brethren from perecution. Please Keep helping us to help others.

More news will be coming of major high profile cases that we at Rescue Christians are working on. We can only do this hrough the support of our readers. You our readers are making a huge difference to thousands of people across Asian and the MIddle East. We started this project with nothing and no experience only 6 years ago and we have saved over ten thousand people from blasphemy, slavery, we have comforted and saved repe victims who have suffered unspeakable acts that are hard even to describe and we have moved hundreds out of danger. Over the coming year we have a goial to try and save ten thousand people and with G-d’s help we will do it. If you would like to be a part of this holy work please donate here

Keep your eyes posted on this blog or for more news on rescues we complete.

Obama muslim slave

sex slaves islam



Islam 27 million black slaves TFernadez

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO This Hidden Fact Predicts Terrorism – Donald Trump Rally, Bangor Maine – Farage For Trump

Ann Coulter: This Hidden Fact Predicts Terrorism

How’d you like to be running a presidential campaign dependent on Muslims not acting up again between now and Nov. 8? It’s getting awfully hard for the media to keep being indignant about Trump’s proposed Muslim ban, as long as Muslims keep blowing things up and shooting people.

I’m assuming here that The Washington Post has not already ruled the Muslims who blew up the Istanbul Airport to be self-hating gays infected by America’s culture of homophobia.

It turns out, Omar Mateen, the Orlando nightclub shooter, also wasn’t a self-hating gay, despite media excitement over that rumor. The FBI has now run down every alleged gay partner of Omar’s, searched his phone and computers, and the alleged gay lovers either had the wrong guy or were lying, and there’s no evidence he was on any gay websites or apps.

As a Muslim immigrant explained in a curbside interview videotaped by Tony Vera at the Los Angeles International Airport recently — before she was arrested — “that’s what we do, we bomb people.”

With impeccable timing, three days before the Istanbul bombing, the liberal Guardian (UK) ran an article sneering at Brexit supporters for wanting out of the European Union before Turkey became a member and the door was thrown open to unlimited migration from this Muslim country that shares a border with Syria, Iraq and Iran.

The article by Liz Cookman was titled, “Turkey, the Brexit bogeyman, is not so different from the UK.”

Liz had a lot of fun with the Brexit-supporting ninnies, so relieved that “the Turks are no longer coming.” She referred to Turkey as “the country whose people Britons are apparently petrified of,” despite the fact that “it turns out Britain and Turkey are not so different after all.”

One way they’re a little different is that Britain has fewer Muslims on hand to blow things up. The attack this Tuesday, which left dozens dead and more than 100 wounded, is the seventh major terrorist bombing in Turkey so far this year, with a total death count in the hundreds.

As with the British media, the American media keep telling us that all these Muslim terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Muslims, and Donald Trump’s suggestion that we impose a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration is madness, bigoted, racist.

Thank God Hitler didn’t claim “Mein Kampf” was a holy book and the Fuhrerbunker a mosque.

Western governments have devoted incalculable resources to developing some diagnostic test other than “Muslim” to predict terrorism. As the New York Times reported earlier this year:

“What turns people toward violence — and whether they can be steered away from it — are questions that have bedeviled governments around the world for generations. Those questions have taken on fresh urgency with the rise of the Islamic State and the string of attacks in Europe and the United States. Despite millions of dollars of government-sponsored research, and a much-publicized White House pledge to find answers, there is still nothing close to a consensus on why someone becomes a terrorist.”

I have a possible indicator! M-U-S-L- …

After the July 7, 2005, London subway bombing by Muslim terrorists that killed 52 people, the British MI5 undertook its own highly sophisticated study, examining hundreds of cases. But the UK’s security agency discovered that terrorists are a wildly diverse lot. They worshipped at a variety of different mosques, for example.

Some terrorists were very religious Muslims and some barely practicing. Most were men, but some were women. There were young and old terrorists, highly educated as well as uneducated, some loners and some married with children.

So, according to MI5, the predictive power of every factor is very low — other than: Is a Muslim.

The researchers claimed their work would “challenge the stereotypes” about who becomes a terrorist, but it pretty much confirmed mine.

Republicans who are furious with Trump for proposing that we hit the pause button on this one category of Third World mass immigration have nothing at all to say about the census report this week showing Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act has so transformed the country that a majority of babies born in the United States today are not white.

The only thing Republicans can do is denounce Obama for not using the words “radical Islamic terrorism.” (As long as they brought up Words Politicians Refuse to Use, when will the eunuchs work up the nerve to say “illegal alien,” “anchor baby” and “amnesty”?)

Obama is a hapless fool, but what is so special about the words “radical Islam”? Maybe it’s not radical Islam. Maybe it’s just “Islam.”

The reason Republicans obsess over Obama’s language is that they can’t go on TV and say nothing, and no one but Trump will say anything useful. To wit: Let’s stop dumping a million Muslim immigrants on the country every year, some percentage of whom we know will commit mass murder.


Donald Trump Rally, Bangor Maine – 4:00pm Live Stream…

Candidate Donald Trump is holding a rally in today Bangor, ME at the Cross Insurance Center.  The event begins at 4:00pm EDT:

Live Stream LinkAlternate Live Stream #1Alternate Live Stream #2

trump im with you

Donald Trump Rally, Bangor Maine – 4:00pm Live Stream…

UK Brexit leader Nigel Farage: Nothing on Earth could ever persuade me to support Hillary Clinton

Trump road

trump syria

trump movement

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO CIA Weapons for ISIS, Syrian Anti-Assad Rebels Sold on Black Market – Bill, Loretta Secret Meeting

CIA Weapons Destined for Syrian Anti-Assad Rebels Sold on Black Market

CIA Weapons Destined for Syrian Anti-Assad Rebels Sold on Black Market

June 28, 2016 by Warren Mass


Weapons that the CIA and Saudi Arabia shipped into Jordan for the so-called moderate Syrian rebels fighting against the regime of Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad were stolen by Jordanian intelligence operatives and sold to arms merchants on the black market, said U.S. and Jordanian officials.

News of the weapons theft was reported for the first time on June 26 after a joint investigation by the New York Timesand the Qatar-based Al Jazeera news network.

According to the report, the large shipments of weapons purchased by the CIA and other intelligence agencies in the Balkans and other parts of Eastern Europe included Kalashnikov assault rifles, mortars, and rocket-propelled grenades. Following the delivery of the weapons to Jordan, the CIA used Jordanian General Intelligence Directorate (GID) officers to transport the weapons to the Syrian rebels; however, many of them disappeared in transit.

Jordanian officials told the Times and Al Jazeera that the theft was apparently conducted by GID officers with direct access to the shipments, who “regularly siphoned truckloads” of the weapons while still delivering some of them to designated drop-off locations. The rogue GID officers sold the stolen weapons at several large arms bazaars in Jordan located in Ma’an, in the southern part of the country; in Sahab, outside Amman; and in the Jordan Valley.

After arms dealers began telling their customers that they had large stocks of U.S.- and Saudi-provided weapons, Jordanian intelligence operatives began monitoring the arms market. Honest operatives not involved in the weapons thefts then began sending reports to GID headquarters noting the growing numbers of weapons on the market and the claims of the arms dealers about their origins.

The report also linked the stolen weapons to a fatal shooting by a fired Jordanian police officer at the Jordan International Police Training Center near Amman, the country’s capital, last November. In that incident, the shooter killed five people, including two American contractors, before being killed by Jordanian security forces. The training facility was set up after the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq to help rebuild Iraq’s postwar security forces and to train Palestinian Authority police officers.

The Times/Al Jazeera report noted that the training program for which the stolen arms were bound, under the code name Timber Sycamore, is run by the CIA and several Arab intelligence services. In 2013, the operation began to directly arm the anti-Assad rebels. The United States and Saudi Arabia are the biggest contributors to Timber Sycamore, with the Saudis contributing both weapons and large sums of money, and with CIA paramilitary operatives taking the lead in training the rebels to use Kalashnikovs, mortars, antitank guided missiles, and other weapons.

Aside from the fact that the theft of these weapons represents a major embarrassment for the CIA, it is a stark reminder of the insanity of our nation’s ongoing interventionist foreign policy. First and foremost of the many questions that every American should ask about that foreign policy is: Why is the United States aiding a rebel insurgency against the legitimate (if brutally authoritarian) government of a sovereign nation? In a region where ISIS is universally recognized as the most dangerous terrorist threat not only to the areas it occupies but even beyond them, it might be supposed that destroying ISIS — not Assad — would be the objective of every nation. Yet, as was noted in an article in The New American last August:

Everybody has heard of the group of barbarians styling themselves the Islamic State, or ISIS, or, ISIL, or whatever they’re calling themselves this week. These savages are still butchering their way through huge segments of Iraq and Syria with U.S. weapons. What fewer people know about is that this terrorist group is largely the Frankenstein creation of the Obama administration’s so-called “anti-ISIS” coalition.

The article quoted a part of Vice President Biden’s 2014 speech at Harvard during which he admitted that there was no “moderate middle” among the anti-Assad rebels in Syria, adding that the insurgency was so focused on removing Assad that it was uninterested in stopping ISIS. However, Biden limited his criticism to the aid that our “allies” in the region were supplying to rebels that included terrorist groups and did not mention the aid our own CIA was giving to them. Biden said, in part:

What my constant cry was that our biggest problem was our allies…. What were they doing? They were so determined to take down Assad and have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, what did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands, of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight. Except that the people who were being supplied were al-Nusra and al-Qaeda and extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) speaking on CBS’s This Morning back in 2014, spoke out against a measure proposed in Congress to aid the Syrian rebels:

It’s a mistake to arm them. Most of the arms we’ve given to the so-called moderate rebels have wound up in the hands of ISIS, because ISIS simply takes it from them, or it’s given to them, or we mistakenly actually give it to some of the radicals.

It would seem that the flow of U.S. arms to ISIS was of such magnitude that the recent revelation of CIA weapons being sold on the black market in Jordan is minor in comparison.

A report in The Hill on September 15, 2014 cited Paul’s assertion that rebel fighters in Syria are focused on overthrowing Syrian President Assad, rather than fighting ISIS and noted that some rebel units had recently agreed to a truce with ISIS.

“I would say one insightful piece of news from the last week is, some of the moderate rebels, so-called moderate rebels have now signed a cease-fire with ISIS,” Paul said. “So, really their enemy is really Assad. They don’t really care what ISIS does.”

As The New American has documented as far back as the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, our interventionist foreign policy in the Middle East has only served to destabilize the region and set the stage for the birth of ISIS, and its spread across large areas of both Iraq and Syria. ISIS has gone from relative obscurity to becoming the world’s best-known terrorist organization in just two years.

The invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power in 2003 created a power vacuum as the authoritarian but stable government headed by Saddam was filled by an assortment of radicalized factions and an ineffective, weak central government in Baghdad unable to maintain order. With the withdrawal of U.S. troops in 2011, things only worsened, and ISIS began its quest to capture much of Iraq and begin its reign of terror. George W. Bush, who authorized the invasion as president, all but admitted this during an interview with CBS Television’s Face the Nation in November 2014 — though he still would not admit that the invasion, itself, had been a mistake.

“I think it was the right decision [to go into Iraq],” Bush told CBS News’ Bob Schieffer. “My regret is that … a violent group of people have risen up again…. This is ‘Al Qaeda plus’ … they need to be defeated. And I hope we do…. I hope the strategy works.”

That “violent group of people,” of course, is ISIS.

If Bush’s action created fertile ground for ISIS in Iraq, his successor, Barack Obama did the same in Syria.

The New American has published multiple articles providing details of how the foreign policy of the Obama administration has contributed to the growth of ISIS and its success in gaining control over much of Syria, including the one we quoted from above.

Sometimes our government has used troops to bring about regime change in the Middle East, and other times it has used the CIA to accomplish this end covertly. Whatever the methodology, however, our intervention in the region has always made things less stable and has fueled the rise of terrorism and Islamic extremism.


Related articles:

In Syria, Obama-backed “Rebels” Battle Obama-backed Militias

Amnesty International Says ISIS Armed With U.S. Weapons

Anti-ISIS Coalition Built ISIS

ISIS: The Best Terror Threat U.S. Tax Money Can Buy

Obama’s “Anti-ISIS” Coalition Built ISIS, Biden Admits

Obama Helped ISIS in Syria, Now Fights It in Iraq

South Korean Intelligence Warns of ISIS Threat to U.S. Bases

Newly Released CIA Documents Reveal Details of Torture at Black Sites


June 29, 2016 by Clifford Cunningham

Benghazi Report: Here's What They're Hiding

Facts point to Benghazi’s use as transfer hub to ship guns to ISIS

The House Select Committee on Benghazi released a report attacking the Obama administration’s response to the terror attack in Benghazi, while conveniently omitting information pointing to Benghazi’s use as a staging ground for clandestine arms transfers to Al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Syria.

The nearly 800-page report, released earlier this week, attacked then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her failure to provide adequate security for America’s diplomatic facilities in Libya in the aftermath of the Western-backed overthrow of Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi, as well as President Obama and his administration for perpetuating the narrative that the attack was caused by outrage over a YouTube video depicting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

Yet the committee’s report omitted all facts relating to the circumstances surrounding the Benghazi attack and the CIA’s clandestine arms smuggling program to Al-Qaeda-linked rebels fighting to overthrow the Syrian government.

As Kurt Nimmo reported, “a number of guests appearing on the Alex Jones Show following the attack have built an indisputable case that the CIA was shipping arms from U.S.-controlled facilities located at the U.S. mission in Benghazi to its mercenaries in Syria and the murder of ambassador Stevens was carried out by an al-Qaeda affiliated group as part of a turf war between the CIA and elements in the Pentagon.”

Retired Army Lt. General William G. Boykin, speaking with CNS News, suggested the United States was using the CIA annex in Benghazi to facilitate secret arms transfers to rebels in Syria, explaining Ambassador Chris Stevens’ presence in the city.

“Then what was Stevens doing there on September 11 of 2012?” Boykin said. “More supposition was that he was now funneling guns to the rebel forces in Syria, using essentially the Turks to facilitate that. Was that occurring, (a), and if so, was it a legal covert action?”

According to reports, the CIA subjected operatives to monthly polygraph tests in an attempt to suppress details of the arms smuggling operation in Benghazi that was ongoing when the attack occurred.

It should come as no surprise that any facts detailing arms transfers to Al-Qaeda-linked rebels in Syria would be kept secret, as the United States, NATO, Saudi Arabia and the Sunni Gulf States have made it their mission to fund and arm radical Wahhabist groups to destabilize the Middle East and bring about a clash of civilizations.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, called the report a rehash of “discredited conspiracy theories,” a term ironically coined by the CIA in 1967 to attack anyone who questions the government narrative.

Original here

Bill Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch Meet on Private Plane

Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with President Bill Clinton on a private plane.

A source tipped off the local ABC affiliate about the brief meeting, which reportedly lasted about 30 minutes, at the Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport.

President Clinton reportedly learned Lynch was arriving soon and waited to meet with her.

According to ABC 15, the meeting occurred hours before the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its final report to the public.

The private meeting comes as Lynch’s Justice Department is investigating presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal, private email server during her time as Secretary of State.

“Lynch said the private meeting on the tarmac did not involve these topics,” ABC 15 reports.

“I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” Lynch stated, confirming the meeting. “Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix.”

“There was no discussion on any matter pending before the Department or any matter pending with any other body, there was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of State Department emails, by way of example I would say it was current news of the day, the Brexit decision and what it would mean,” Lynch said about the meeting.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Are You Ready To Leave UN And Agenda? – MB Obama Defends Globalization, Vows Commitment to ‘International Order’

Globalists Intend To Use Food As Key Weapon In World Takeover

Are You Ready To Leave The UN And Their Agenda?

Trump is exposing all he can expose the rest is up to “We The People”.  The establishment is angry at the American people for waking up. The United Nations is being exposed for their real goals and ambitions which are global and far from nation building!

2015 Hank's Yanks Golf Classic

One of the projects that have been hidden from us in plain sight is the Wildland’s Project for sustainable development agenda 21.  Hillary  and Bill’s Foundation have been on board and wielding it in lock step!  Not only the Wildland’s but the entire agenda of one world everything.  Please read the following from a PDF of the United Nations General Assembly UN Enviornmental Programme (UNEP)  and their sinister plans.

In December 1972, UN Resolution 2997, which created the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), was adopted by the UN General Assembly. It is the catalyst for the whole movement toreorganize society under the guise of “saving the environment.” This group has remapped the whole world into bioregions, and is responsible for virtually all of the environmental policy changes that have occurred globally in the last two decades.

AGENDA 042214agenda21

Their five-step action plan [“The Reorganization of Society, ” eco-logic Magazine (Publ. By Environmental Conservation Organization, Hollow Rock, TN), September/October 1995, p. 4] as presented in UNEP documents is to:
1. Redraw land maps to differentiate biological characteristics rather than political jurisdiction.
2. Regroup human populations into self-sustaining settlements that minimize impact on biodiversity.
3. Educate humans in the “gaia ethic,” which holds that Gaia is the creator of all life and all life is a part of the creator. (New World Order Religion).
4. Create a new system of governance based on local decision-making within the framework of international agreements.
5. Reduce the use of natural resources by (a) reducing population; (b) reducing consumption; and (c) shifting to “appropriate” technology.

What simpler, more effective method could there be for ultimate, absolute control of human populations than the methods that are being advanced under the banner of “environmental and biodiversity protection”? Read the list above once more. Notice who will be in control. Note that humans will be “regrouped” (relocated) in accordance with a master plan. Human populations must be “self-sustaining,” which virtually guarantees a vastly diminished standard of living, especially for western civilizations. In conjunction with that, note the emphasis on “shifting to appropriate (i.e., radically downgraded) technology.”

Notice the emphasis on the “gaia ethic” (nature worship) as the supreme “ethic” (i.e., world religion). Notice the reallocation of the powers of governance: “local decision making within the framework of international agreements.” This would effectively bypass Congress and chop the behemoth of public opposition into small, manageable pieces. Note the emphasison reduced population. Readers familiar with the radical agenda of the Cairo Conference on Population last year will remember the forcible thrust of the abortion rights agenda as a “population control” measure.

The program underway to undermine the concept of private property rights, especially in the western portion of the U.S., is ample evidence that the socialist planners behind this global agenda are implementing their program now. If unopposed, their efforts will, in time, establish by precedent the authority of prevailing governments to control the whole spectrum of human activity: reproductive rights, property rights, lifestyle, consumption, and even the level of technology permitted. It is a ghastly picture, but the evidence is mounting steadily to support the reality of what lies ahead if the global planners have their way. The primary reason that such dramatic progress toward UNEP objectives has been made in recent years is the fact that very few people have recognized that the common denominator in the whole movement is an arm of the United Nations!  Read more here:

agenda 1383508_658915530815107_36665058_n

Trump is the only hope of thwarting this evil that is being shoved down our throats, and has been in motion for decades!

WARNING Rental Property Owners – New “Disparate Impact” Lawsuit Is A Huge Threat

Obama Defends Globalization, Vows Commitment to ‘International Order’

President Barack Obama spoke strongly in favor of globalization on Wednesday, vowing to pursue an “international order” in spite of the recent decision by voters in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.

“The integration of national economies into a global economy, that’s here. That’s done,” he said after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Pena Neito at the North America Leaders’ Summit in Canada.

He accused the United Kingdom of trying to escape global responsibility by voting to leave the European Union.

“Their argument was not against trade generally. They just didn’t want any obligations to go with the access to the free market,” he said.

Imitating Britain’s path by withdrawing from existing trade deals was “the wrong medicine” according to Obama.

“We’d lose jobs and the amount of disruption that would be involved would be enormous,” he said.

He repeated his argument for his Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, pointing out that it was important for the United States to write the rules of international trade in Asia.

“We’re going to keep on pushing hard to shape an international order that works for our people,” he said. “But we’re not going to be able to do that by cutting off trade, because that’s going to make all of us poorer.”

Globalists Intend To Use Food As Key Weapon In World Takeover

Alex Jones shows how the globalists have steered societies and managed resources, not for prosperity, but to control populations and destroy the middle class.


canada trudeai agenda 21 sharia

UN agenda21


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Brexit Would Make No Sense If You Took This Popular HS Class – 27 Yr Old Londoner Explains Their Brexit Vote…

Brexit Would Make No Sense If You Took This Popular High School Class

New guidelines for a European history class the nation’s advanced high-school students take will educate a generation of American citizens to be bone-ignorant about Europe.

Brexit Would Make No Sense If You Took This Popular High School Class


If you learned your European history in an Advanced Placement European history class, you would have no idea why the United Kingdom just voted to be independent from the European Union. As I learned when I wrote the National Association of Scholars’ new report “The Disappearing Continent,” that’s because those classes are now taught according to the College Board’s Advanced Placement European History Course and Exam Description (APEH). It’s a history of Europe from the view of the bureaucrats in Brussels whom the British people just tossed on their ears.

APEH never tells students about Britain’s history of liberty. It describes Parliament as an instrument of elite domination, not as the forge of freedom.

APEH scarcely tells students about how Britain invented the justification of the free market with Adam Smith, put it into practice with Victorian free trade that enriched the world, or under Margaret Thatcher freed it from the dead hand of the welfare state.

We Don’t Need No Stinking Knowledge

APEH never tells students Britain is exceptional, different from the other countries of Europe, and has been for a thousand years and more. They don’t know how Alfred the Great saved Wessex from the Danes, the Magna Carta established the seeds of liberty, or Englishmen chopped off the head of Charles I to prove they were free men.

APEH never tells students about the heroes of British liberty. It doesn’t tell them how John Milton argued that the press should be free, since God had given every human being the ability to discern the truth. It doesn’t tell them about William Wilberforce, whose faith in God inspired him as he brought about the abolition of the slave trade.

It doesn’t tell them about Winston Churchill, who rallied Britain to stand against the Nazi conquest of Europe. “Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties,” Churchill told his countrymen, “and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘This was their finest hour.’” APEH never tells students about that finest hour.

APEH never tells students anyone might object to the European Union’s “challenges to national sovereignty.” It never tells students that the euro has wreaked misery across southern Europe, that the European Parliament is an undemocratic motley of authoritarian hacks, that unelected bureaucrats in Brussels have been grinding at freedom with an endless stream of administrative codes, or that free movement across European borders includes the uncontrolled movement of welfare scroungers, refugees, and terrorists.

APEH never tells students Britons are proud of their history of liberty and their independence. It never tells students Britons might look at their past and take from it the lesson that they should seek their own independent course once more, in defense of Britain’s liberty. APEH never hints to students that we might have cause to cheer them on.

Secular Welfare States: Mmm, Mmm, Good!

There’s a great deal else that the College Board doesn’t tell students about European history, from Christopher Columbus’ discovery of America to the Soviet genocide of the Ukrainians. The College Board’s version of European history doesn’t have much room for faith or freedom, and it doesn’t have much room for just how different the nations of Europe are from one another.

Some of these citizens will be in charge of our foreign policy in a little time, and then America will be flying blind.

It doesn’t say to American students that Europe’s heritage of liberty is our birthright, and that the most important reason we should care about Europe’s history is because it will help us learn about our own liberty, why it matters, and how we can fight to preserve it. All it says is that Europe is a place where secularism happened and a welfare state came about—and never hints that anything else could ever have happened, in Europe or anywhere in the world.

Britain’s vote to leave the European Union would be unimaginable to a student who took the College Board’s AP European History examination. So are an awful lot of other headlines in the news. The religious roots of jihadi terror in Paris? Not in APEH. The brutal Soviet subjugation of Eastern Europe, which explains the alarm Putin’s neighbors feel as Russia rattles its sabers? Scarcely mentioned. The College Board is educating a generation of American citizens to be bone-ignorant about what’s happening in Europe, and what might happen next. Some of these citizens will be in charge of our foreign policy in a little time, and then America will be flying blind. The consequences of their ignorance of European history could be catastrophic.

The College Board needs to revise its AP European history examination to teach America’s students properly. It would be even better if Americans created more testing companies, so our schools could have an alternative to the College Board’s monopoly. History should help us cherish our liberty, and other people’s, and it should help us know what’s going on in the world. Britain’s jailbreak from the European Union’s prison-house of nations illustrates just how badly the College Board’s European history examination does at both these jobs.

David Randall is director of communications at the National Association of Scholars. His academic writing includes work on early modern British history.

Original here

A 27-Year-Old Londoner Explains Their Brexit Vote…

A 27-year old Londoner explains why they voted to exit the European Union, including the backlash and social climate.  The entire article is well worth reading – Excerpt:

brexit 13[…]  I believe the E.U. is a fascist, racist organization, a pro-war alliance and a massive corporate lobby. The EU’s own propaganda spells out its xenophobic worldview very clearly.

The following advert from 2012 shows a white woman dressed similarly to the violent protagonist in Tarantino’s movie, Kill Bill, walking into a deserted warehouse where she is threatened by 3 insulting stereotypes: an Asian martial arts expert, a sword-yielding, flying man in a turban, and a half-naked black man threatening her with his capoeira moves.

She replicates herself all around them so they are surrounded by 12 of her, thus ‘civilising the violent barbarians’ who then sit down to negotiate before they disappear, encircled by the 12 stars of the European Union – watch it here if you don’t believe me:

[…] In my opinion, immigration should occur at a speed that the majority of the existing population, wherever they were originally from, is happy with. Elected governments should be held completely accountable to the people, which can only happen in a sovereign state with a true democracy.

With a truly educated and diverse population that was in control of its own nation, politicians would not get away with murder so easily, and trials could be held to give terroristic governments and war criminals the punishment that would prevent such leaders from ever being elected again. In order for ordinary people rather than multi-national corporations to influence governments, there needs to be democratic accountability and (more importantly) devolution of power and wealth, spread out as locally as possible to protect against corruption.

In other words, self-responsibility and self-governance is needed (the exact opposite of the EU). This would stop the bombs that are leading to the current mass influx of migrants into Europe.

Economically speaking of course, there is enough information online for anyone to see that every country in Europe is being eaten alive.

We cannot keep misinterpreting the cries of suffering people across Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and the rest, as cries for us to stay in. Hundreds of millions of people in Europe feel under attack and need the EU to end, just as our fellow citizens do.

Of course, those who pull the strings will make austerity far worse as punishment for daring to get out, but don’t forget how dire the situation already was. Those in the mainstream who seek to dismiss the suffering of the English, Greek, or Spanish working classes as far-right bias or provincial ignorance are dangerous people with vested interests in corruption and inequality, whether they have the personal intellect to realise it or not.

For greater economic forecasts and some invaluable insights, go and read or watch anything by the Forecaster (this was the name of the 2014 documentary about his life), Martin Armstrong, whose ability to crack the code of the rigged stock market earned him 11 years in jail without trial in the United States. He is out now and it is worth finding out not only why he views the European Union as a sinking ship, but also how he places Brexit within a wider seismic global shift.  (read full article)

brexit pundits

A 27-Year-Old Londoner Explains Their Brexit Vote…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Brexit Leader Nigel Farage Blasts EU in European Parliament Speech – Le Pen In Support Of Brexit

Brexit Leader Nigel Farage Blasts EU in European Parliament Speech

June 28, 2016 by  C. Mitchell Shaw


Nigel Farage (shown) has been ridiculed for many years for his efforts to get the United Kingdom out of the European Union while a member of the European Parliament from England. But he is now enjoying his day in the sun. Basking in the glow of  last week’s Brexit success, he addressed the European Parliament on Tuesday, telling the body that the Brexit vote by his countrymen was a rejection of the EU and its politics. He was — in every meaning of the word — ebullient.

For its part, the European Parliament was less than welcoming of its soon-leaving member. Before Farage could even get through his cheerful introduction of wishing them all a good morning, the multinational body was booing and hissing to the point that EU President Martin Schultz had to remind them that “one major quality of democracy is that you listen” to someone “even if you don’t share their opinion.”

Farage took it in stride and thanked Schultz before beginning again. “Isn’t it funny?” he asked the assembled members, adding, “You know when I came here 17 years ago and I said that I wanted to lead a campaign to get Britain to leave the European Union, you all laughed at me. Well, I have to say, ‘You’re not laughing now, are you?’”

There is little doubt that Farage’s very presence served to remind them of the failures of their policies. It also caused some confusion. EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who had spoken before Farage, asked what Farage was even doing there since the United Kingdom had voted to leave the EU.

In his address, Junker said he “would call on the UK government and I will be speaking to the Prime Minister later” to ask him “to clarify the situation as soon as possible,” adding, “We cannot be embroiled in lasting uncertainty.”

Farage spent the lion’s share of his nearly seven-minute speech spelling out — in vivid detail — both the reasons for and the implications of the Brexit victory, telling the assembled members, “You — as a political project — are in denial.” He then listed the three most obvious examples of that denial.

“You’re in denial that your currency is failing,” Farage said before being interrupted by the crowd. He responded to the interruption by clarifying his point. “Well, just look at the Mediterranean! No, no, no. As a policy to impose poverty on Greece and the rest of the Mediterranean, you’ve done very well.”

He then addressed the issue of borders. “And you’re in denial over Mrs. Merkel’s call last year for as many people as possible to cross the Mediterranean into the European Union,” he told the angry group. This unchecked immigration, Farage pointed out, “has led to massive divisions between countries and within countries.”

Saving the best for last, Farage accused the body of rank dishonesty in the way it has brought about “political union,” and told them that the Brexit was a reasonable reaction to that subterfuge:

But the biggest problem you’ve got — and the reason, the main reason the United Kingdom voted the way that it did — is you have, by stealth, by deception, without ever telling the truth to the British or the rest of the peoples of Europe, you have imposed upon them a political union. And when the people in 2005 in the Netherlands and France voted against that political union, when they rejected the constitution, you simply ignored them and brought the Lisbon Treaty in through the back door.

What happened last Thursday was a remarkable result, it was indeed a seismic result — not just for British politics, for European politics, but perhaps even for global politics, too. Because what the little people did, what the ordinary people did, what the people who’ve been oppressed over the last few years and seen their living standards go down did, they rejected the multinationals. They rejected the merchant banks. They rejected big politics. And they said, actually, “We want our country back. We want our fishing waters back. We want our borders back. We want to be an independent, self-governing, normal nation.”

Nigel Farage 20 years ago you laughed at me, you are not laughing now

As if to rub salt in their collective wounds, Farage predicted that the fallout has only just begun. He said that by leaving the EU, the United Kingdom has put itself in the position of offering “a beacon of hope” to other member states who have had enough. “I’ll make one prediction this morning,” he said: “The United Kingdom will not be the last member-state to leave the European Union.”

Looking over his shoulder at EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, Farage said, “So the question is, ‘What do we do next?’ Now, it is up to the British government to invoke Article 50, and I have to say that I don’t think we should spend too long in doing it.” He added, “I totally agree with Mr. Junker that the British people have voted and we need to make sure that it happens.”

Since that will mean a “new” form of government and a “new” way of interacting with the countries still in the EU, Farage began laying out his idea of what that should look like. “What I would like to see is a grown-up and sensible attitude to how we negotiate a different relationship,” he said. “Now, I know that virtually none of you have ever done a proper job in your lives, or worked in business, or worked in trade, or indeed ever created a job, but listen, just listen.”

Schultz, who again had to quiet the body before Farage could continue, used this moment to get in his own jab at Farage: “Ladies and gentlemen, I do understand that you’re getting emotional, but you’re acting like UKIP [UK Independence Party — of which Farage is the leader] normally acts in this chamber, Schultz said, adding, “So please, don’t imitate them. Mr. Farage, however, I would say one thing to you. The fact that you’re claiming nobody has done a decent job in their life, you can’t really say that, I’m sorry.”

Farage used the interruption and Schultz’s jab to illustrate a point: The times, they are a-changing. “You’re quite right Mr. Schultz,” Farage responded. “UKIP used to protest against the establishment, and now the establishment protests against UKIP, so something has happened here.”

Farage then used the last remaining minutes of his time to lay out his plan for how the now-free United Kingdom could continue to be a good neighbor to the EU:

Let us listen to some simple, pragmatic economics. Between your countries and my country, we do an enormous amount of business in goods and services. That trade is mutually beneficial to both of us. That trade matters. If you were to decide to cut off your noses to spite your faces and to reject any idea of a sensible trade deal, the consequences would be far worse for you than for us. And even no deal is better for the United Kingdom than the current rotten deal than we’ve got. But if we were to move to a position where tariffs were reintroduced — on products like motorcars — then hundreds of thousands of German workers would risk losing their jobs. So, why don’t we just be pragmatic, sensible, grown-up, realistic, and let’s cut — between us — a sensible tariff-free deal and thereafter recognize that the United Kingdom will be your friend, that we will trade with you, we will cooperate with you, we will be your best friends in the world. But do that, do it sensibly, and allow us to go off and pursue our global ambitions and future.

His was the voice of a man who knows he is throwing off the shackles that have so long bound him and his countrymen. It was the voice of a man who is willing to negotiate because he knows he doesn’t have to beg any longer. Nigel Farage spoke with the voice of freedom and the conviction of principle that comes along with that freedom.

As he sat down, the vaunted European Parliament was a booing, hissing group of bureaucrats who seem to know that their days are numbered.

Photo: Nigel Farage (from a screen-grab of his address to the European Parliament)

Belgium: Le Pen lauds Brexit as ‘cry of love’ to a ‘het up’ Euro Parliament

Jun 28, 2016

Leader of the French National Front party Marine le Pen put her support behind the Brexit result during the first European Parliament session following the UK referendum on their EU membership, Tuesday, calling it “a slap in the face to the European system that was increasingly faced of fear, on blackmail on lies.”

SOT, Marine le Pen, leader of the Front National (French): “Ah yes, dear colleagues. Why are you getting so het up? Look at how beautiful history is when liberty succeeds and the will of the people can push things forward. The UK is leaving after the result of the referendum. This is perhaps the most important historic event of the continent since the fall of the Berlin wall. It’s the signal of liberty, of freedom sent out to the entire world. It’s a cry of love of the people for their country. The British have chosen to take a path that was assumed to be closed for all time and you, well you believed it was closed, those who said it’s all irreversible, the European Union is irreversible, the British people have told you where to get off. This is a victory for democracy. This is a slap in the face to the European system that was increasingly faced of fear, on blackmail on lies. ”

SOT, Marine le Pen, leader of the Front National (French): “Now if you’ve been blind for decades by implementing absurd policies that brought deindustrialisation, mass unemployment and mass immigration, then it’s difficult to come back down to reality with a bump and see what is really happening.”

SOT, Marine le Pen, leader of the Front National (French): “The way ahead is simple. Either you persevere with your expensive bureaucratic Europe and the crazy schemes of you who want more Europe at a time when ordinary people want less, and if you do go down that path I guarantee you that this totalitarian organisation will collapse or you get rid of crazy Europe. We have to look for cooperation between free people and strong nations. In my own country of France I commit to pursuing the path of liberty, which is the only way to real grandeur, long live free peoples, long live the United Kingdom, and long live France.”

freedom liberty

vigilance liberty john adams

Liberty Thomas Jefferson TFernandez


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

FBI: People Have No Need To Know If On ISIS Kill List – Al-Qaeda: Kill Whites or US Won’t Think Its Jihad

FBI Not Telling Americans on ISIS ‘Kill List’

fbi raid


Image: FBI Not Telling Americans on ISIS ‘Kill List’ (Getty Images)
28 June 2016 By Todd Beamon


The FBI has not informed many Americans that they are on various encrypted “kill lists” published by the Islamic State or others inspired by the terrorist group.

“The FBI and other government agencies have very wide latitude to deny releases of information for the public for national security reasons, to a degree that I personally find very unsettling,” Ryan Mauro, a national security analyst for the Clarion Project, told Newsmax Tuesday in an interview.

The Clarion Project, based in Washington, monitors Islamic terrorism and its supporters in the U.S.

“All they have to do is say it is related in some way to an ongoing investigation or national security,” Mauro said. “It is very difficult for the public to contest that rejection because you don’t know what they are holding.

“The way that government agencies seem to block researchers like myself at every turn is something that should be of concern to every American,” he said.

Mauro was responding to a report Monday by Circa News that the FBI had not informed many Americans that they were on the encrypted lists that have been published in recent months on private websites.

Circa News accessed copies of the some of the lists and called a sampling of Americans listed. They included homemakers, military personnel, college professors and art dealers.

The New York residents sampled told Circa News that they had received calls from the New York City Police Department about their being on ISIS lists.

But in Texas, 22 of the 24 citizens sampled said they had not received any information from the FBI or from their local police departments, according to the report.

Two police departments in which residents lived also said they had not been informed. “I was terrified,” a woman who lives in Austin, told Circa News. “We live in a different world — and the Jewish community is a number one target of these radicals.”

She and several friends from a local Jewish community were on one ISIS list sampled for the report.

“I’m very upset that I was not notified by the FBI or local law enforcement,” said the woman, who asked not to be named.

In recent months, groups claiming to be ISIS or its affiliates have published more than 15,000 American names on encrypted websites, Circa News reports. Hacking groups have released eight lists between March and last month.

Those lists have included the names and addresses of 56 New Jersey state police officers, 36 Minnesota state police officers, 11 Tennessee county board members, 50 federal employees — as well as more than 70 military staffers or family members, according to the report.

The pro-ISIS groups have directed individuals or groups to kill those on the lists.

In addition, six days before the Orlando terror attack, the United Cyber Caliphate, a pro-ISIS group, issued its list of nearly 8,000 names on the messaging app Telegram that was discovered by

The group’s statement, released on June 6 and written in both English and Arabic, called on sympathizers to “follow” those on the list and “kill them strongly to take revenge for Muslims.”

The list included 7,848 people identified as being in the U.S., including 643 in Florida.

On June 12 around 2 a.m., Omar Mateen, 29, of Fort Pierce, Fla., entered the Pulse nightclub and fatally shot 49 people, wounding as many as 53 others, before a police SWAT team killed him.

Mateen was born in New York — and he was a U.S. citizen whose parents were from Afghanistan. He had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State during the attack.

When questioned by the Circa News report, an FBI spokeswoman told Newsmax in a statement Tuesday that “our standard practice is to decline comment on specific operational and investigative matters.”

However, she provided this statement, which was also published by Circa News:

“The FBI routinely notifies individuals and organizations of potential threat information. We perform these notifications so potential victims are aware of possible threats and take appropriate steps.

“Those measures may include paying close attention to your surroundings at all times, protecting personally identifiable information, and immediately calling the local authorities if you observe something suspicious,” the statement said. “The FBI will continue to work closely with federal, state, and local partners to keep the public informed of potential threats.”

Mauro said that the FBI was possibly thinking that “telling those with their names on the list will cause unnecessary panic and grant ISIS victory.

“From that point on, all ISIS has to do is collect random names and contact information and publish it — and they’ll get the headlines, cause fear and force the government to use up valuable resources.”

Americans suspecting they might be on a kill list have only one option, Mauro said.

“The most that individual Americans can do is file a Freedom of Information Act request, wait a long time — and hope the FBI complies.”

Al-Qaeda: Kill Whites or US Won’t Think Its Jihad

The Boston bombing. (Photo: © Reuters)

 June 29, 2016

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) is worried that people are misunderstanding the motives of jihadist attacks. They have urged their followers to make sure to attack white heterosexual Americans in order that their motives are not misrepresented as being an issue of gun violence or other hate crime.

The group became worried following the reactions to the Orlando attack, in which a gunman who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State killed 49 people at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando Florida.

“Avoid targeting places and crowds where minorities are generally found in America” Al-Qaeda wrote in the latest issue of its propaganda magazine Inspire, in a piece titled “Inspire guide: Orlando operation.”

Otherwise “the federal government will be the one taking full responsibility” and people will not give the jihadi ideology credit for the attack.

In order to ensure the attack is properly labeled, Al-Qaeda recommends that jihadis strike “areas where the Anglo-Saxon community is generally concentrated. This class of the American community is the majority and it is the one that is in the American leadership.”

AQAP, which carried out the attack on the Charlie Hebdo magazine in January in 2015, killing 12 journalists and cartoonists, also said it supports jihadi attacks in the West regardless of which specific group carries them out. Al-Qaeda has been locked in a struggle for supremacy with the Islamic State since Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi split from Al-Qaeda in 2014, later declaring himself Caliph.

“We standby and support all Muslims who attack America in their homeland regardless of their affiliation to any group or loyalty” Al-Qaeda said.

For more information about Al-Qaeda’s rival the Islamic State see Clarion Project’s Special Report: The Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL)

rape rob refugee race


Left’s Response To Al-Qaeda Turns Internet Parody Into Real Life

Former Gitmo al-Qaeda “High Risk Terrorist” Sneaks Into Brazil Ahead of Olympics and Disappears…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments