Miscarriage of Justice Against Judge Roy Moore

judge roy moore AL Sup Ct

Oct 20, 2016 by Matt Barber


Under the “progressive” leadership of Barack Obama and his like-minded “social justice” warriors throughout all levels of government, we have entered an era of lawlessness unprecedented in American history. This is no more apparent than in Alabama where Chief Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court has been unlawfully removed from the bench at the hands of liberal activists on Alabama’s Court of the Judiciary (COJ).

The case is under appeal.

This miscarriage of justice was carried out at the behest of the left-wing extremist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an anti-Christian activist organization that seeks to undermine, if not extinguish altogether, the free exercise of religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

To add insult to injury, Judge Moore’s law clerks were likewise terminated without warning or explanation late last week. The Chief quickly issued a statement in response: “My appeal is still pending but Justice Stuart [interim chief] is acting like she has already decided the appeal against me. I have asked Justices Stuart, Bolin, Main and Shaw to be recused from hearing my case. Justice Stuart’s action against me personally and the subsequent firing of the staff attorneys I hired is troublesome and such actions prejudge the case. Instead of acting as though my appeal has already been decided, I call upon these justices to recuse. None of them should have any role in appointing successor justices to hear my appeal.”

Chief Justice Moore further remarked, “I have been targeted for my belief in marriage, a belief shared by the majority of Americans. No one can point to any illegal, unlawful or unethical aspect of my four-page Administrative Order. That order was a status report on the case. A justice should not be removed from office because of a political agenda.”

The facts of the case are clear and beyond dispute. Chief Justice Moore was arbitrarily removed from the bench for a “2016 Administrative Order [that] was merely a status report of a pending case before the Alabama Supreme Court,” notes Mat Staver, chairman and founder of Liberty Counsel. “The order did not change the status quo. It did not create any new obligation or duty. To suspend Chief Justice Moore for the duration of his term is a miscarriage of justice and we will appeal this case to the Alabama Supreme Court. This case is far from over,” he added.

On September, 30 the COJ issued a decision on the trumped-up charges against Chief Moore. The Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) requested that he be removed from the bench. Under the COJ rules, removal requires a unanimous 9-0 vote by the members of the COJ, which is made up of judges, a lawyer and laypeople. Absent a 9-0 unanimous vote, the COJ cannot remove a judge from the bench. But, in an unbelievable violation of the law, the COJ suspended without pay Chief Justice Moore for the remainder of his term, which runs through January 2019. When his term expires, he will be ineligible to run for election as judge again because of his age. So the suspension until the end of his term is a de facto removal from the bench. This is both an unethical and illegal circumvention of the letter of the law.

“To suspend Chief Justice Moore for the rest of his term is the same as removal. The COJ lacked the unanimous votes to remove the Chief, so the majority instead chose to ignore the law and the rules,” concludes Staver.

The COJ’s disgraceful actions have resulted in a tremendous backlash among both the majority of Alabama voters, as well as legislators on both sides of the aisle. This has put both the SPLC and the COJ on the defensive. In arambling screed written for Al.com, SPLC president Richard Cohen betrays his personal vendetta against Chief Justice Moore, his lack of knowledge about the U.S. Constitution and the laws of Alabama, as well as an astounding level of anti-Christian bigotry.

“Moore attempted to put his personal religious beliefs above the rule of law,” writes Cohen. “The United States has always been defined by a fundamental belief in the rule of law,” he adds, evidently oblivious to the jaw-dropping level of irony and hypocrisy found within his words.

Cohen goes on to slander Chief Moore, smearing him as “intoxicated with his own self-righteousness” and maligning him as having “disgraced his office.”

In fact, Cohen gets only one thing right, noting: “The court heard the case against Moore and rendered a decision it likely knew would be deeply unpopular across the state.”

Indeed, it’s little wonder the COJ knew its decision would be deeply unpopular. Most politically-motivated hit jobs are. Especially when they’re illegal.

Still, the blowback has begun and legislators are moving to undo the damage to the rule of law committed by the SPLC and its COJ cohorts. “This group of individuals are not accountable to the voters of Alabama,” observed Alabama GOP Chairman Terry Lathan in a statement. “Their charge as a body is to address and make decisions on corruption cases involving judges in Alabama. At no time has this case been about corruption,” he added.

“Judge Moore was elected, twice, by the citizens of our state. In light of this, two groups who are unaccountable to the voters have overstepped boundaries in suspending a statewide elected judge. On May 21, 2016, the Alabama Republican Party passed a resolution strongly opposing the removal of Chief Justice Moore.”

“On August 27, 2016, the Alabama Republican Party passed a resolution calling for the Alabama executive, legislative and judicial branches of government to enact and implement a law for the election of all members of the Judicial Inquiry Commission by vote of the people of Alabama.”

“We stand by our resolution of support for Judge Moore and our resolution to call for a vote of the people regarding the election of all members to the Judicial Inquiry Commission,” concluded Lathan.

With both potential legislation and the appeal pending, the Roy Moore saga continues. Will the rule of law be reestablished in Alabama, or will politically-motivated witch hunts like this one represent the future for the heart of Dixie?

If Alabama voters have any say, I expect to see the former.

original here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Trump Rally, Lead Tracking Polls Shock Potential Enormous’ – Brazile’s E-mail Tip Of The Media Bias Iceberg

Brazile’s E-mail Is The Tip Of The Media Bias Iceberg

Hemingway: Brazile’s E-mail Is The Tip Of The Media Bias Iceberg

‘This is not just about Donna Brazile at CNN, this is about John Harwood. . . It’s people at Politico, people at The New York Times.’

Federalist senior editor Mollie Hemingway joined Fox News to talk about how the most recent WikiLeaks dump has revealed corruption among the media and Democrats.

“It was audacious, it was arrogant, and it’s completely unacceptable for what we have learned from these WikiLeaks,” Hemingway said about DNC interim chairwoman Donna Brazile’s response when she was questioned about allegedly sending questions to be asked in an upcoming debate to the Clinton campaign.

While the e-mails leaked by WikiLeaks were indeed stolen, the facts appear to indicate it would have been possible for Brazile to have known a debate question and to have sent it to the Clinton campaign ahead of the debate, she explained.

“Donna Brazile herself is the current head of the DNC because of previous WikiLeaks that showed that corruption in the Democratic Party,” she said. “This is also part of a much bigger story that we’ve learned from WikiLeaks which is just this general compliance among the media with the Clintons and with Democrats.”

“This is not just about Donna Brazile at CNN, this is about John Harwood, who was the moderator for the GOP debate, being so obsequious with John Podesta, sending emails and talking about how great Hillary Clinton is and how silly it would be that you would even have a concern about her email. He sent that email a month before he was moderating a GOP debate.”

“It’s not just him, it’s people at Politico, people at The New York Times who were passing quotes along to the Clintons and saying ‘You can veto this quote’ or that quote or saying ‘Can I run this story,’” Hemingway said. “This is such a violation of journalistic ethics, it’s just not even close.”



Kaine has previously dismissed Wikileaks documents as possibly inaccurate, doctored or fabricated

Oct 21, 2016 by Zerohedge

First, earlier this afternoon, Wikileaks surprised observers when its released in addition to the daily trove of Podesta email, a handful of what appear to be emails sent from Obama’s heretofore secret email address; then, moments ago, in a tweet that suggests the vendetta between Julian Assange – who we now know is being pressured by the Ecuadorian government in its London embassy under notice from the US State Department – and Democrats has gotten serious, Wikileaks tweeted that “we have a surprise in store for Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile.”

Prior to tweeting this, the Wikileaks twitter account mocked Hillary’s statement that 17 agencies have confirmed Russia hacked the US when it said that Hillary Clinton’s “17 US intelligence agencies” include:
Coast Guard, DEA, Navel Intelligence, Department of Energy, Air Force recon, and then added that “Clinton’s “17 US intelligence agencies” may be the biggest, most immediately disprovable wopper ever intentionally made during a debate.”

It is now quite clear that it has gotten very personal between Assange and Clinton, and if the latter is elected president in less than 3 weeks, that drone strike on Julian which Hillary does not remember “joking about”, may suddenly materialize.

original here

Trump Confronts MSM Treason

Pat Caddell: ‘Polling Is All Over the Place… Shock Potential Is Enormous’

Pollster and analyst Pat Caddell discussed recent presidential election polling on Friday with Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Alex Marlow, saying, “Something is going on in this country in these polls.”

“All of the tracking polls keep holding at Trump being ahead,” he continued. “And then all of these other polls that are one-off polls, or whatever … I don’t know how they’re doing some of these university polls. You just put the name of some university and apparently it becomes credible, whether they know what they’re doing, or not.

Caddell was pointing out the discrepancy between the different types of polls. “But in any event, polling is all over the place…. Something isn’t adding up,” said Caddell.

“Something is going  to happen here, I just sense it,” he concluded. Either “Hillary will glide into the White House, or we’re headed for one of the greatest shocks in American politics. I think it’s a very close call. I think the shock potential is enormous.”

Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.



Watch Live: Donald Trump in Johnstown, PA

Friday at 4 p.m. ET, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will hold a rally in Johnstown, PA at the Cambria County War Memorial Arena.

Video courtesy of Right Side Broadcasting Network

Follow Breitbart.tv on Twitter @BreitbartVideo






POLL: MOST AMERICANS STILL SAY HILLARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED 53 percent of voters surveyed say FBI should have sought criminal indictment against her

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Wikileaks $12 M Pay To Play PROOF, Hobbs Act – Compromised More Than Emails – Hillary’s Podium LIT UP


Wikileaks Strikes Hillary Again With The Most Shocking Pay To Play Leak of 2016!

Oct 20, 2016 by Kosar

hillary pay to play

We have always known that Hillary Clinton was for sale during her time at the State Department.

Many politicans try to do this, but Hillary’s corruption is so massive that it’s historic.

Now, just hours after the debate, WikiLeaks provided the smoking gun we’ve been waiting for. Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollary pay-for-play from Morocco!

This leaked email from the 13th batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails shows direct confirmation that a meeting was set up with Hillary Clinton, and it was paid for with that massive cash payoff:

And Hillary Clinton confirmed that the WikiLeaks emails are authentic last night during the debate:


Hillary Clinton can blame the Russians and foreign agents all she wants. The emails are real, and so is the criminal corruption. Hillary Clinton used the Secretary of State’s office to become obscenely wealthy, and she put America’s national security at risk repeatedly.

Hillary couldn’t apply for a job in the federal government because of the security concerns that would cause. She deserves to be investigated and indicted.

The media can’t cover this up, and the American people now know the truth. WikiLeaks just revealed exactly how corrupt Hillary Clinton is.

Day After Debate, WikiLeaks Strikes Hillary With The Most Shocking Leak of 2016! — Flurry of Thoughts

original here

Why is Hillary’s Podium LIT UP With what Appears to be an LED Screen?



Donald Trump won the final debate hands down.

Many are calling this his best debate to date.

He was calm, measured, confident, and he stayed on message.

Hillary, on the other hand, appeared drugged up, with glazed eyes and a goofy smile plastered on her face and frequent outbursts of inappropriate laughter. 

Many people online are questioning why Hillary’s podium is “lit up.”

This same thing occurred at the last debate – where she had what appeared to be an LED screen on her podium.

The images below show something illuminated on her podium, while Trump’s appears perfectly normal.

Is his more scamming and cheating from team Hillary?



Oct 21, 2016  By Bob Fredericks

original here

Hillary Clinton Tops Middle East Forum’s ‘Islamist Money List’

 21 Oct 2016 by Allum Bokhari

The Middle East Forum has released its 2015-16 “Islamist Money In Politics” list, charting the top ten recipients of contributions from Islamic organizations — and Hillary Clinton is at the top of the list.

According to the Middle East Forum, their list tracks political donations from “from individuals who subscribe to the same Islamic supremacism as Khomeini, Bin Laden, and ISIS.”

Clinton has received a total of $41,165 from individuals that the Middle East Forum describes as “prominent Islamists,” including $19,249 from senior officials of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was declared a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates on November 15, 2014.

Republican Party candidate Donald Trump and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson took no money from Islamists, according to the report.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein has reportedly accepted $250, while defeated Democratic Party candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders accepted $9,285  Jill Stein has accepted $250. Donald Trump and Gary Johnson have not received any Islamist money.

Other top recent recipients of money from the enemy include Rep. Keith Ellison ($17,370) and Rep. Andre Carson ($13,225). The top-ten list includes nine Democrats, one independent (Sanders), and no Republicans.

Hillary Clinton has been a fierce critic of Donald Trump’s proposal for a freeze on Muslim immigration to the United States. “We are a country founded on religious freedom and liberty. How do we do what [Trump] has advocated without causing great distress within our country?” Clinton said earlier this month. “Are we going to have religious tests when people fly into our country?”

Beyond political donations, the Clinton Foundation has received millions from Islamic countries. Saudi Arabia, dominated by radical Sunni fundamentalists and ruled by Sharia law, donated up to $50 million to the Clinton Foundation, while the Emirate of Qatar has donated between $1 million and $5 million.

According to Clinton’s own State Department, Qatar’s human rights violations include “trafficking in persons … legal, institutional, and cultural discrimination against women limited their participation in society.”

You can follow Allum Bokhari on Twitter, add him on Facebook. Email tips and suggestions to abokhari@breitbart.com.


She Compromised Way More Than Just Emails: Security Agent Tells “What Hillary Is Really Like”




POLL: MOST AMERICANS STILL SAY HILLARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED 53 percent of voters surveyed say FBI should have sought criminal indictment against her

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

VIDEO Trump Missing Real Danger of Election Rigging – Desperate to Cling to Power

Donald Trump is Missing the Real Danger of Election Rigging



Oct 20, 2016 by Eric Rush

Over the last week, members of the establishment press have seethed with mock outrage over accusations by Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence, that the upcoming general election is being “rigged by the national media.” Since the two began making these claims, obsequious pundits and television talking heads on the left have, with decidedly spooky overtones, unilaterally adopted the label “dangerous and irresponsible rhetoric” to characterize these claims. Amidst all of this, the press has enthusiastically reported on certain feeble allegations that Trump is a misogynistic reprobate with an Andrew “Dice” Clay deportment toward women.

When the liberal press begins to squeal like a 1950s cartoon housewife treed atop a chair due to the mouse scurrying around her kitchen floor, one can pretty much rest assured that the charges to which they’re reacting are more than well-founded.

To regular readers of this column and millions who will be casting votes for Trump and Pence next month, it is well known that the establishment press corps (that’s pronounced “core” rather than “corpse”) is nothing but a propaganda machine dedicated to advancing the international socialist agenda. In 2008, we witnessed their wholesale deception of voters with regard to the character of one Barack Hussein Obama. During his presidency, we’ve seen this group run interference for every illegal, unethical and unconstitutional act he and his co-conspirators have committed. Now, they’re pulling out all the stops, since they’re backing a known criminal inHillary Rodham Clinton; worse, they are faced with an electorate that is, at least in part, more aware of her character than they were of Obama’s eight years ago.

That said, I am far less concerned with press claims that Trump parboils preemies for lunch than the very real possibility that the upcoming election could be literally rigged by the progressive-socialist establishment through the use of technology, mass election fraud and good old thug tactics.

Most have forgotten this by now (if ever they were aware of it to start with), but the 2008 Democratic primary was marked by massive, organized election fraud. During the 2012 election, there were widespread and confirmed instances of election fraud related by voters and voting machine technical personnel; these reported that voting machines were flipping votes for Republican nominee Mitt Romney to incumbent Barack Obama. In other instances, entire precincts reported zero votes for Romney, a statistical impossibility.

We also recall the outcry on the part of the Romney campaign and GOP leaders in the wake of these crimes after Obama won a second term.

Wait … that’s right – there wasn’t an outcry. Isn’t that curious?

As with each and every atrocity committed by the Obama administration, as well as those recently revealed as having been committed by Hillary Clinton and her husband, not one meaningful response to systematic election fraud on the part of Democrats has ever been made by Republican leaders. Nor have they ever criticized the Democrat proclivity for vehemently resisting efforts to reinforce the integrity of the voting process. How strange that their priorities in this area appear to be identical to those of the press. At present, we’re even hearing some GOP leaders all but endorse Hillary Clinton, citing the aforementioned feeble allegations against Donald Trump.

In the meantime, the press continues to release polling data that allegedly shows Clinton and Trump in a nose-to-nose race. How very interesting, considering the anecdotal evidence: Huge Trump rallies versus pathetic ones for Clinton, public data dumps revealing Clinton’s crimes and a demonstrable antipathy toward the political status quo amongst Democratic, Republican and independent voters alike.

To understand the true political lay of the land at present, one must ask oneself but one question: How did Donald Trump win the Republican nomination in the first place, a prospect that was almost laughable a year ago?

If one wants to discuss ancient video of Trump, they might consider clips of the candidate being interviewed on television talk shows 20 or 30 years ago. Many of these make it apparent that he has known what ails America politically for a very long time, and he is articulating the remedies right now. His talk of “draining the swamp” of those in the political class who compromise Americans’ liberties, trade, our economy, our international standing and our national security evidences this wisdom. These are the things against which average Americans are currently railing (whether they know it or not), and Trump acknowledging them when no one else in the political arena is doing so reflects his knowledge of the scope of change our nation will have to undergo in order to preserve the republic.

Should Ms. Clinton win the presidency through propaganda and election fraud, we can be sure that their stealth socialist accomplices in the GOP will simply treat it like an honest win and don the “aw, shucks; better luck next time” mantle. They will continue to play the foil to Democrats as the latter spearheads the push toward America’s initiation into a fascistic socialist mega-state.

In such a case, it is likely that the blinders will come off, and millions of voters will suddenly comprehend the scope of change our nation needs to undergo in order to preserve the republic – but by that time, it will almost certainly be too late.

original here

Caught In The Act! Massive Voter Fraud For Hillary

Vote Rigging Guru and Former Federal Prison Inmate Robert Creamer Visited White House 340 Times – Visited Obama 45 Times

Oct 20, 2016 by Tim Brown


Vote Rigger Robert Creamer was exposed earlier this week by James O’Keefe at Project Veritas regarding rigging elections.  However, what you may not know is that Creamer spent time in a federal prison in 2006 for bank fraud and visited the White House 340 times, including 45 times to visit Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah.

Zero Hedge reports:

Earlier today we wrote about a new Project Veritas undercover video that uncovered several democratic operatives openly discussing, in explicit detail, how to commit massive voter fraud.  One of the operatives was a person by the name of Robert Creamer who is a co-founder of a democratic consulting firm called Democracy Partners.  Within the video, an undercover journalist details a plan to register Hispanic voters illegally by having them work as contractors, to which Creamer can be heard offering support saying that “there are a couple of organizations that that’s their big trick” (see: “Rigging Elections For 50 Years” – Massive Voter Fraud Exposed By Project Veritas Part 2“).

Unfortunately, the embarrassing video caused Creamer to subsequently resign from consulting the Hillary campaign as he issued a statement saying that he was “stepping back from my responsibilities working the [Hillary] campaign” over fears that his continued assistance would be a distraction for the campaign. 

But voter fraud isn’t Creamer’s only criminal specialty.  A quick look at Wikipedia reveals that Creamer spent 5 months in federal prison back in 2006 for a “$2.3 million bank fraud in relation to his operation of public interest groups in the 1990s.”

So, with that kind of history, you can imagine our surprise when we discovered that a Mr. Robert Creamer showed up on the White House visitor logs 340 times beginning in 2009 when Obama took office and culminating with his latest visit in June 2016.  Moreover, in 45 of those instances, Creamer was scheduled to meet with POTUS himself.  Perhaps this is just two old Chicago “community organizers” hanging out?

Additionally, the White House logs show Creamer showing up at midnight on several days.


Here’s the video the broke the initial story.

Let’s also not forget that Creamer is married to Illinois Democrat Representative Jan Schakowsky, who is an anti-American.

Again, I ask, where is Congress in all of this?  If this Republican-led Congress was not as corrupt as the Democrats why has there not been one article of impeachment written against Barack Obama?  Why do they cower in fear?  Why do they huff and puff and threaten to blow the house down, but then tuck their tails between their legs and play politics as usual?  Could it be that they are just as guilty of criminal activity under our Constitution and aiding and abetting the enemies of the US, including Obama and Hillary Clinton?  I’ll leave that for you to figure out, but as for me, I’ve already determined that is exactly what they are doing by their inaction.

original here

Desperate to Cling to Power: If Trump Upsets Election, “Martial Law Could Follow”

Oct 20, 2016 by Mac Slavo


Simply put, the stakes are very high for this election.

Whether he is a farce, or a force to be reckoned with, Donald Trump has shaken the foundations of the establishment.

And there may be hell to pay.

So far in 2016, we have witnessed the two party system collapse, as the GOP was taken over from within, and the Democratic party fought a coup against a grassroots insurgency to install Hillary Clinton as their favored puppet president.

Every media pundit on the airwaves has circled round and round the flaws of Trump, while giving Hillary perfect cover to steal the election in plain sight.

These things are happening… and there is every possibility that civil unrest could result after a contested – or strongly challenged – result in November.

If angry Trump supporters, possibly encouraged by Trump himself, took to the streets, things could get pretty nasty.

And only weeks away, it remains a real possibility.

There is also the outside chance, as Michael Snyder has discussed, that a Trump victory could be challenged by the system itself. On the pretext of war with Russia, or a catastrophic terror attack, an economic collapse – or anything at all that can be blamed on election aftermath – President Obama could declare martial law, and call for an election do-over (keeping himself in charge until things are sorted out, of course).

There is a very real push for a big war to revive the empire economy, and the grip of the system; there is a very real chance that this country is on the brink of conflict, division and fallout on a scale never before seen.

As Joe Joseph discuses, the elections are indeed being hijacked, war is being fixed and the powers that be are preparing to make the people accept the election outcome – one way or another:

In this edition of The Daily Sheeple’s “Daily News Update”, Joe Joseph goes over the treasure trove of documents that have come out against the Clintons… It safe to say that this election is a textbook example of how leaders are selected, not elected. Joe also highlights five ways martial law can be enacted in the United States!

The Elections Are Being Hijacked! Possible Martial Law to Follow

Hopefully nothing of the sort happens, but in these dark and strange times, anything is possible.

One thing is certain, the American people won’t be able to vote themselves out tyranny and deception. But it appears that the path to peaceful revolution is being cut off, leaving more pressure than ever on all sides, waiting to explode.

Stay vigilant.

Read more:

If Trump Wins, Will Obama Declare Martial Law To Remain In Office? “These Are Not Normal Times”

If Martial Law Comes to America “Dissidents and Subversives Would Be Rounded Up”

“The Fraud Is Rampant”: Registering the Dead And Illegal Immigrants to Steal the Election

original here


POLL: MOST AMERICANS STILL SAY HILLARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED 53 percent of voters surveyed say FBI should have sought criminal indictment against her

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO ‘Whisperer’ Caught On Hillary’s Hot Mic As Her Brain Freezes At 1 Question

October 20, 2016 by Rebecca Diserio


Someone whispering can be heard on Hillary Clinton’s mic as she stumbles during a crucial answer at last night’s debate. This is no hoax. It can be heard on every video of the third presidential debate, although it was easy to miss as Americans watched it live. More shocking and concerning is how she was stumbling with a tough question when the whisper is heard, making sure Hillary knew what to say.


Hillary Clinton at the 3rd presidential debate. Many say “the Whisperer” was from an earpiece, some say covert “comms” glitch went live for a few seconds.

The strange whisper came towards the end of the debate as moderator Chris Wallace asked about the topic of Aleppo in Syria. Hillary was struggling and had a momentary brain freeze on immigration and Muslim refugees coming into our country, which is one of the biggest topics of this presidential election for Americans.

Hillary must memorize all of her talking points in advance, but what if she freezes during a crucial answer? They needed a backup plan, and that plan seems to be some way they can communicate with Hillary, but that won’t be picked up on the hot mic. However, something went wrong and “the whisperer” was picked up for about 3 seconds.

Many say “the Whisperer” was from an earpiece, some say covert “comms” or a communication glitch went live for a few seconds.

Hillary stumbled, and although it was really quick, you can hear a whisper as she pauses while talking about the Orlando shooter. The whisper was caught on Hillary’s hot mic as she was grasping for words. Hillary’s campaign must have been in panic mode since she needed to make the point that the Orlando shooter was born in America, with their point being, we should not fear Muslim migrants when we have homegrown terrorists.

While there’s debate about what the whisper is, we know what the whisper is not. It’s not any pundits. Their mics are all off during a debate, and the fact that the whisperer is heard on every video of the debate from CBS, PBS, CNN, FOX, and even MSNBCtells us it is not doctored. It’s a whisper coming directly from Hillary and caught on her hot mic.

Should we be surprised? We all know Hillary has major health problems and that she has frozen before with her mystery handler coming to her rescue, who had to give her a verbal cue to start talking again.


Hillary’s brain froze while speaking at her rally, her handler had to give her verbal commands to get her to start speaking again.

A shocking Wikileaks email backs up Hillary’s strange demands which she requires while on stage for speaking engagements, also giving credence to the fact that she is worried about her health. Huma Abedin wrote to Hillary campaign manager John Podesta:

“Just want to make sure someone has coordinated with you on hrc [Hillary Rodham Clinton] speech set up. She won’t be able to give it in the round like [Bill Clinton] does walking around with microphone. Are we able to set it up so shes speaking at a podium [sic]? [via Wikileaks]

Then, there’s this nugget of information: Hillary’s cabal knows she is “super sensitive” about her health, proving her illness is no secret in her inner circle. If someone is relatively healthy for their age, they are not sensitive regarding their health nor do they need a strategy to cover it up as Robby Mook, her campaign manager, discussed with campaign chairman John Podesta:

“Have you talked with her at all about taxes and health? I’m [sic] know both are hyper sensitive but I wonder if both are better dealt with very early so we control them — rather than responding to calls for transparency. What do you think?” [via Wikileaks]

In the correspondence, another member of the Clinton camp says,I don’t know how likely that is but the press is on a transparency kick.” That statement proves that when it comes to the Clintons, the press demanding any transparency is just a “kick,” meaning it’s not normal operating procedure.

The big network cable TV news and liberal rags like the New York Times may be in the bag for Hillary, but the American people have wised up. Hillary is a disaster. She has major health issues; she has been around for 30 years, getting rich with the corrupt Clinton Foundation, pocketing donations meant for disaster victims; she put a server in her basement, putting all our lives at risk; and she has paid agitators to beat up Trump supporters.

Hillary cheats every chance she gets, and she cheats because she can’t answer questions on the fly. We may never know the truth about all of Hillary’s cheating ways, but one thing is certain, this woman has no business running for president.


‘Whisperer’ Caught On Hillary’s Hot Mic As Her Brain Freezes At 1 Question — Flurry of Thoughts

original here


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VIDEO Hillary LIED Trump and Hillary Tax Plans: Trump’s Plan Wins – Full Meltdown

Tax Foundation Rates Tax Plans of Trump and Clinton: Trump’s Plan Wins

Tax Foundation Rates Tax Plans of Trump and Clinton: Trump’s Plan Wins

Oct 20, 2016 by  Bob Adelmann


Analysis by the Tax Foundation of all that is currently known about the tax plans proposed by presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton concludes that, if enacted, Clinton’s plan would expand government at the expense of a shrinking economy. On the other hand, Trump’s plan would grow the economy, shrink government’s revenues, raise wages, and expand employment.

But it’s not tax “reform,” claims the study’s author, Kyle Pomerleau, just modifications of the existing tax code. The code would be more complex under Clinton’s plan and only slightly less so under Trump’s.

Because Trump’s plan is unclear about something called “pass through” — the taxation of income that is passed from a business entity onto its owner’s personal income tax form — the foundation did two analyses: one based on leaving present law as it is, with the other based on its interpretation of remarks made by Trump and his advisors.

Either way, Trump’s plan, if enacted, wins going away: GDP over the next 10 years under Clinton would shrink by 2.6 percent while under Trump it would grow between 7 and 8 percent. Capital investment in the economy would be discouraged under Clinton’s plan, declining by seven percent, while it would grow by between 20 and 23 percent under Trump’s.

Real wages under Clinton would drop 2 percent, while under Trump they would grow between 5.4 percent and 6.3 percent. Jobs under Clinton would decline by 700,000 while they would increase under Trump by between 1.8 million and 2.2 million.

The details are equally ugly under a Clinton plan: She would put a 4-percent “surcharge” on high-income earners, establish a 30-percent minimum tax on taxpayers earning more than $1 million a year, would limit the amount of itemized deductions those high earners could claim (thus exposing more of their income to taxation), and raise the tax on capital gains to a maximum of nearly 40 percent. She would also limit the total value of tax-deferred and tax-free retirement accounts that citizens could accumulate, forcing more of their income to be subject to taxation.

Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would cut tax rates substantially on ordinary income to 12 percent, 25 percent, or 33 percent, depending on amount. He would also cut the tax on capital gains accordingly. He would increase the standard deduction from $6,300 (currently, for singles) to $15,000 and from $12,600 (currently, for married couples) to $30,000. His plan would also cut corporate tax rates from today’s 35 percent — the highest in the world — to just 15 percent.

To help readers understand the Tax Foundation’s study and conclusions better, its author said that “Trump’s tax plan would increase the size of the economy … because [it] would increase investment opportunities in the United States … and … would drive foreign investors to invest more in the United States.” On the other hand, Clinton’s plan, wrote Pomerleau, “would reduce the long-run size of the economy … [while taking] all of the new revenue (and then some) and spending it on new government programs.”

He added that Clinton’s plan would increase the tax code’s present complexity significantly while Trump’s plan would simplify it a little. The big unknown in the Clinton plan centers on what she calls “business tax reform” but which is never defined. Pomerleau explains:

For months she has promised to raise more than $200 billion through “business tax reform.” However, no one seems to know exactly how she would do it. It could be borrowed from President Obama … which would tax multinational [corporations’] overseas profits at 14 percent.

The difference between the two plans is predictable, and startlingly clear: Clinton wants to punish capital while Trump wants to reward it. She wants larger government and a smaller economy while Trump wants to cut government’s revenues while giving the economy a chance to breathe again.

Missing from the Tax Foundation’s discussion, however, is any mention of the methodology used to make its calculations. We don’t know if they took into account the incoming flood of new investable capital that multinationals have been forced to keep overseas thanks to the United States’ present burdensome tax rates. Estimated at more than $2 trillion, even some of that capital coming back into the country would have a positive effect, resulting in more jobs, higher wages for the skilled workers that would be needed, and an expanded tax base.

Also missing from the foundation’s conversation was any mention of the Laffer Curve. We don’t know if the Foundation used the predictable and eminently logical analysis of how lower tax rates usually raise government’s revenues — often significantly — thanks to a larger economy generating higher profits. The U.S. economy presently produces about $18 trillion worth of goods and services in a year. If that number could be expanded by just 10 percent, to $20 trillion, not only would government revenues increase due to higher productivity of existing workers but also by the new ones who would come into the labor market in response to greater demand and higher wages. Those new employees would also reduce demands on the welfare state, reducing government’s funding of unemployment benefits, food stamps, and disability payments (some of those currently on “disability” are likely to be persuaded to come back to work given sufficient economic incentive).

More realistically the Tax Foundation’s efforts may be an exercise in futility. In the sausage-making machine (no one wants to know how either sausages or laws are made) in Washington, politicians will no doubt seize upon whatever plan is offered and make certain that their own particular interests are served in private agreements and quid-pro-quo deals that ultimately define what finally arrives on the floor for a vote.

To be noted: Nothing presented by either candidate addressed the pending financial implosions of Social Security, Medicare, or ObamaCare. Nothing was said about the heavy hand of the administrative state that makes it increasingly difficult for any employer to turn a profit, no matter what the tax code is. Nothing was said about military spending or how wars to build the American empire abroad would be financed. Instead, it was all about offering to manipulate the present tax code to favor certain interests over others in order to get elected in November.

An Ivy League graduate and former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached atbadelmann@thenewamerican.com.


“She Was In Full Meltdown”: Hillary Unleashed On Donna Brazile For Unapproved Debate Question

Oct 20, 2016 by Mac Slavo

Hindsight is making more and more clear that Hillary’s outrageously rigged campaign is dependent – heavily dependent – on control over the media.

Nearly every question she has been asked during the past 18 months has been approved and agreed upon ahead of time. Hillary’s responses have been heavily scripted and rehearsed.

It even emerged that Donna Brazile, who is a CNN contributor and who was appointed interim chair of the DNC after Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out, shared questions that were meant to be spontaneous with the Clinton campaign in advance.

But in this alleged behind-the-scenes account, Donna Brazile becomes the brunt of Hillary Clinton’s anger after host Matt Lauer sprung an unapproved question about the email scandal on her.

As analyst Bill Still points out in the video, Hillary’s famously furious temper was unleashed after she lost control of the narrative. She can hardly be trusted with the difficult and consequential decision made in the Oval Office:

Check out what Hillary was claimed to have shouted at her staff just after leaving the stage of the forum, as she used and abused her presstitute media relations and her lapdog advisors shaping her entire ascent to power.

According to State of the Nation, who in turn received an anonymous email from who they believe to be an insider at NBC:

Behind the scenes, NBC technicians and cameramen at the Wednesday night, Commander-in-Chief Forum (Sept 7) report that Hillary Clinton was so angry and incensed that she had been  ‘blind-sided’ by one question she was not prepared for and had not approved in advance.

“When her time in front of the cameras ended, Clinton shook the hand Lauer extended to her and smiled once more for the wide camera shot and then Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and threw it at the face of her assistant and the screaming started. She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her – she went kind of manic and didn’t have any control over herself at that point. How these people work with this woman is amazing to me.


[Hillary was] screaming at her staff, “you f – – – ing idiots, you were supposed to have this thing set up for me and you’ve screwed it up!   If that f – – – ing bastard wins we all hang from nooses!   Lauer’s finished…and if I lose it’s all on you ass – – – – s for screwing this up.”


Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available, but Hillary will never let this rest.  She has made it clear that she wants Matt Lauer to be “persona non grata – for putting her on the spot.”

Interim DNC chairman Donna Brazile, the first black woman to hold the position, was singled out by Hillary during the rant.   She screamed at Donna, “I’m so sick of your face.   You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f – – – ing Lauer get away with this.   What are you good for, really?   Get the f – – – to work  janitoring this mess – do I make myself clear?” 

A female NBC executive said that Donna Brazile looked at Mrs. Clinton and never flinched, which seemed to enrage Hillary all the more.  The executive continued, “It was the most awful and terrible…and racist display – such a profane meltdown I have ever witnessed from anyone,  and I will never forget it.

Hillary reportedly shouted at Donna Brazile about the media ‘failure’ of allowing real questions to be asked.

“You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f – – – ing Lauer get away with this. What are you good for, really?   Get the f – – – to work  janitoring this mess – do I make myself clear?””

This statement makes sense in no other context but one – Donna Brazile’s entire role – unofficially – in the campaign centers around coordinating media coverage, and disciplining anyone pretending to be a real journalist in this show election, while handing out treats to good lapdogs. Brazile as a liaison between CNN and the Democratic Party, is functioning like a majority whip in Congress – only no one is supposed to do this.

The source also claimed that Hillary got on the phone with Comcast executives demanding that Matt Lauer be punished and censored, once again supporting the theme of total media control.

One thing is certain, Lauer WAS heavily criticized after the debate in the mainstream media – including by NBC executives – for not challenging Trump’s claims more closely.

According to Real Time Politics:

Matt Lauer totally bombed at the NBC Commander-In-Chief Town Hall Wednesday night, and he has received a ton of criticism from fans and critics alike over his clearly biased performance. Now, one report says that his bosses agree with the criticism… several high-ranking sources at NBC News “said they hear the criticism and agree with at least some of it.”

Lauer has been widely criticized for not challenging a number of Donald Trump‘s statements, including his fully debunked claim that he opposed the Iraq War.

USA Today quotes several major papers who trashed Lauer, while noting the NY Times criticism that Lauer focused too much time on the emails:

“Lauer devoted about a third of his time with Mrs. Clinton to questions about her use of a private email server, then seemed to rush through subsequent queries…”

Being this much in bed with the corporate media is a clear problem, but that’s how thoroughly corrupt the election has become. Even after lobbying softballs, Matt Lauer supposedly presented a problem for posing ONE real question… WTF?

While this dramatic story is not confirmed, and wasn’t caught on video (supposedly all staffers are barred from carrying phones), it is does mesh with plenty of other disturbing and confirmed document leaks showing the the Hillary campaign engages regularly in “planting media stories,” and the heavy-handed pro-Hillary coverage is already plain to see for anyone paying attention to the election coverage.

As Zero Hedge reported, Guccifer 2.0 dug out documents that prove the media collusion:

The first revelation comes from a January 2015 strategy document written by Hillary’s press secretary, Nick Merrill, about how the campaign should approach reporting on Hillary’s decision to run for president.  The memo identifies “Maggie Haberman” of Politico as someone who had a “very good relationship” with the campaign and who had “teed up stories” for Hillary in the past.


America can never be America with the media operating as a P.R. firm for the worst of the worst in Washington, and yet it goes on and gets worse with each passing day.

With the increasingly important role of suppressing dissent on the web (through algorithms that down-rank flagged political content), this terrible form of censorship is engulfing blogs and websites as well, and those offering sharp criticism often find that their audience and influence have diminished.

What does the future hold for sites like this one? Will we continue to be able to raise questions about Hillary’s emails?

If Matt Lauer is skewered for the slightest sign of backbone, what happens to the rest of us?

original here





Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VIDEO Clintons STILL preying on Haiti disaster victims by pocketing millions, Corp Media Cover Up!


Shocking Footage: Media Caught Covering Up Clinton's Ongoing Looting Of Haiti

Oct 19, 2016

The Clinton Foundation is scamming millions of people by pocketing nearly all of the $30 million it’s raised for Haitians needing severe medical care.

Additionally, the mainstream media is ignoring over a million people are in distress in Haiti in favor of attacking Donald Trump.

“You’ve got the Clinton Foundation here, but guess where they’re at? At Port-au-Prince, wheeling and dealing at the Marriott, trying to put money in their own pockets,” Joe Biggs pointed out. “Meanwhile you have people here with their legs snapped and fractured backs trying to get help, trying to get out of here, trying to get the medical attention they should have, and the Clintons are more concerned with putting money in their own pockets.”

In other words, Bill and Hillary Clinton are taking advantage of a natural disaster to make millions, according to the Haitians themselves who are struggling in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew.

Infowars crew members recently travelled to Haiti with billionaire filmmaker and pilot Gary Heavin to expose the crimes of the Clintons against the Caribbean nation.

Joe Biggs and Michael Zimmermann left for the island on a mission to bring food and supplies to the people hit hardest by Hurricane Matthew.

On their journey they documented UN helicopters refusing to take dying Haitians to a hospital only 30 minutes away, a crowd of people nearly rioting when asked about the Clintons and drone footage of the destruction brought to an already suffering community.

Many groups are working with all their effort to assist the injured and hungry, but the Clinton Foundation is nowhere to be seen.

In 2010 Haiti was rocked by an earthquake killing around 9,000 people.

To donate to a real charity that’s actually helping the Haitians, unlike the Clinton Foundation, please visit FERHA, which is primarily managed and operated by Haitians.

Learn more how the Clintons preyed upon the island and took advantage of the victims in these special reports.

original here

trump hillary haiti


Haiti earthquake and recovery



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments