Social Media Censorship Panel at CPAC – Rejected Berkeley Op-Ed, Founding Fathers, DACA

GELLER: Social Media Censorship Panel at CPAC — James Damore, Harmeet Dillon, Pamela Geller, James O’Keefe, Jim Hoft, Dan Gainor

20 Feb 2018 by Pamella Geller

This week at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) 2018, my organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), is partnering with the American Principles Project (APP), which is hosting our blockbuster panel discussion on the social media giants’ rapidly accelerating attempts to shut down conservatives and deny a voice to everyone who dissents from the hard-left agenda.

Yes, we’re back at CPAC, and, as always, with a panel that addresses one of the most urgent issues of the day:

Suppression of Conservative Views on Social Media: A First Amendment Issue

Major social media platforms such as Google, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube have created the new town square, having become the primary portals through which Americans receive news today. On these platform, the Left has a monopoly. The social media giants are moving actively to erase and hide any viewpoint or person that does not conform to the “progressive” values for which they stand.

This has resulted in massive losses of readership and revenue for conservative sites, and endangers the very freedom of our Republic by allowing only one point of view to be aired. The social media corporations today hold more power over the public discourse than any totalitarian regime ever held. They do not just target voices with whom they disagree, but they make sure that those voices are unable to sustain themselves.

This panel will discuss the magnitude of this phenomenon, and discuss ways that the power of these Leftist social media outlets can be limited, such that voices that dissent from the hard-Left agenda can again be freely heard.

February 23, 2018, 3:00 pm Chesapeake B-C

Panelists will include:

James Damore, Google whistleblower

Harmeet K. Dhillon, renowned free speech attorney

Dan Gainor, Vice President for Business and Culture, Media Research Center

Pamela Geller, Editor and Publisher, Geller Report, President, American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and author of Fatwa: Hunted in America

Jim Hoft, Editor-in-Chief, Gateway Pundit

James O’Keefe, Project Veritas

Marlene Jaeckel, Tech entrepreneur

America, the world’s first government based on individual rights and personal liberty, should be on the forefront of the defense of freedom of speech across the world, the light among nations, the “shining city on a hill.” Instead, social media giants, run by uniformly leftwing corporate managers, have become the new totalitarians. This evokes the worst totalitarian regimes in the history of the world. Never in modern history has such immense power been in the hands of so few.

Panelist James O’Keefe added: “Social media giants in Silicon Valley have quickly become the world’s most powerful media gatekeepers, even more powerful than the mainstream media. We exposed Twitter for silencing and shadow banning people they do not agree with, and propagated their preferred views for political and financial purposes.”

Panelist Dan Gainor said: “Tech/social media companies are vastly more powerful than their old media predecessors in print and TV ever were. We’ve already seen some of the dangers of what happens when that power is abused. This isn’t just a panel discussion about what might happen. This is a wake-up call for the entire conservative movement.”

Another panelist, Jim Hoft, observed: “2016 was the first election where conservatives fled the liberal mainstream media. After decades of smears and abuse they found the truth in conservative media online. Today there are forces working to make sure this does not happen again. It’s time to stand up before it’s too late.”

This groundbreaking panel discussion follows on the heels of Can’t We Talk About This? The Islamic Jihad Against Free Speech, our shocking new film detailing the concerted effort by international organizations to compel the U.S. and other Western countries to curtail the freedom of speech and criminalize criticism of Islam.

This issue — the suppression of the freedom of speech on social media — affects all of us on the right. In fact, it is the most critical issue of the day: if we are stripped of the means to communicate with one another, it’s all over. It was free people speaking freely on social media, outside of the reach of the media establishment, that got Donald Trump elected President of the United States. When the left lost the election, they lost their mind.

We must not allow the left to strip us of the weapons we used to win that victory. That’s what we’ll be fighting for at CPAC.

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of The Geller Report and author of the bestselling book, FATWA: Hunted in America, as well as The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the ResistanceFollow her on Twitter or Facebook.

Rejected Berkeley Op-Ed: The Founding Fathers Would Have Detested DACA

20 Feb 2018 by Naweed Tahams

Editor’s Note — This op-ed was originally submitted to the Daily Californian, the student newspaper of UC Berkeley, by Berkeley student and Vice President of the Berkeley College Republicans Nahweed Tahmas. When contacted by Breitbart News to determine why the Daily Californian refused to publish Tahmas’ op-ed, the Editor-in-Chief sent a link to the paper’s op-ed guidelines, which state that they reserve the right to not publish “libelous, racist, sexist, homophobic or highly offensive” content.

Support for “undocumented immigrants” is a quasi-religion here at UC Berkeley.

Students regularly protest on behalf of “Dreamers,” and our school has an entire department of its bureaucracy, the Undocumented Student Program, dedicated to aiding students who were brought to the United States illegally. For many in the Cal community, it is difficult to imagine why anyone would not support granting citizenship to undocumented students.

In this piece I will argue that it is in fact a perfectly reasonably position to be wary of immigration, and one which many extremely sensible people have taken.

To understand immigration, we have to first understand why it matters. To do this, we must familiarize ourselves with the basic philosophy behind the nation-state.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines a nation as “a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.” The campus left, it appears, would remove everything but the last six words of this definition.

Nations, including the United States, are forged by their own sets of unique ideologies and historical circumstances. In the case of the United States, our foundational ideals are rooted in the British Enlightenment, which found its most complete expression in the United States Constitution.

Many of our Founding Fathers were extremely wary about immigrants who did not share their values coming to the United States. Hamilton on Broadway might be best-known for such zingers as “Immigrants… we get the job done!” but if the campus left knew Alexander Hamilton’s real views on immigration, they might not be so quick to sing his praises.

In 1802 Hamilton wrote that, “The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits.

“Foreigners,” Hamilton believed, “will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners,” and that this “has often been likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another.”

Hamilton considered this dangerous because “In times of great public danger there is always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone weakens the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader.”

In other words, immigrants have the power to subvert a nation to the interests of their own home country. Do you doubt it? Just look at how often certain Hispanic student groups wave the Mexican flag on our campus.

A woman holds a Mexican flag on the campus of UC Berkeley

A woman holds a Mexican flag on the campus of UC Berkeley

Hamilton’s political rival, Thomas Jefferson, shared Hamilton’s concerns about immigration. Jefferson wrote in “Notes on the State of Virginia” that immigrants “will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth… In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation.

Jefferson went on to ask, “Suppose 20 millions of republican Americans thrown all of a sudden into France, what would be the condition of that kingdom? If it would be more turbulent, less happy, less strong, we may believe that the addition of half a million of foreigners to our present numbers would produce a similar effect here.”

Jefferson loved France; he was certainly not “racist” towards the French. But he recognized that even two populations as ethnically similar as the French and Americans would have difficulty mingling without conflict.

Even Benjamin Franklin expressed concerns about large numbers of German immigrants settling in the colonies and failing to assimilate to English culture and values.

Nor were his concerns unfounded. They are backed up by modern social science, including the research of Robert Putnam, which shows that increased ethnic diversity has detrimental effects on social trust.

Does this mean that immigrants have no place in the United States? Hardly. In the long term, the Germans did assimilate, as did many other immigrant groups.

But this was not an easy process, and immigration must be carefully controlled in order to preserve and safeguard our country’s basic cultural norms. To further this end, our government should rigorously enforce our immigration laws. Indeed, as President Clinton once said, “We are a nation of laws.” We cannot provide special exemptions to law breakers for this would corrode our legal system.

We are fortunate to live in the United States, and we should do everything we can to prevent the sort of poverty and violence characteristic of most of the world outside the West from being transplanted here.

Thus America must commit itself to being a nation of laws, no matter how sympathetic some individual stories may be.

The typical Cal student would likely support ending racial bias in our law enforcement system, on the basis of equality. This is a noble aim, and I do not see why any other law, including our immigration laws, should not be executed with the same level of evenhandedness.

The left may point to Emma Lazarus’ poem “The New Colossus,” inscribed on the base of the Statue of Liberty, as their strongest emotional argument for immigration, but it is worth mentioning that poem was tacked onto the statue 17 years after it was built in order to co-opt its original meaning and essentially turn it into a pro-immigration propaganda piece.

It is also worth mentioning that the counterpart to Liberty, in our Pledge of Allegiance, is Justice, and there is a reason why Lady Justice wears a blindfold.

Some may say that undocumented students share our values. If they do, then they should have no problem demonstrating their commitment to respecting American rule of law by following our nation’s legal immigration process, as millions of others before them have done.

Naweed Tahmas is a senior studying Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley, and is the Vice President of the UC Berkeley College Republicans.





Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO DHS To Publish Report: several million illegals voted, while legitimate ballots were thrown away

DHS to Publish Proof of Massive Dem Voter Fraud in 2016 - QAnon

Feb 20, 2018 by 


WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) together with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI are planning to publish in March a study of the 2016 elections that will demonstrate massive Democratic Party voter fraud of a magnitude sufficient to have influenced election outcomes.

On Jan. 3, 2018, President Trump signed an executive order disbanding the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, largely because states controlled by the Democrats refused to cooperate.

Many Democrats breathed a sigh of relief, thinking President Trump had given up his effort to uncover and correct the decades of Democratic Party voter fraud.

Little noticed was a provision in the executive order that tasked the Department of Homeland Security to review the presidential commission’s initial findings and to determine next courses of action.

Equally unnoticed by the mainstream media were news releases on Feb. 15 from the DNI and from DHS that briefings were being held with election officials in all 50 states on Feb. 16 and Feb. 18 to inform them of the initial conclusions of their on-going investigation into voting fraud during the 2016 election.

The outcomes of the DNI, DHS, and FBI investigations are expected to be disastrous for the Democratic Party, revealing precisely why Democratic-controlled states refused to cooperate with Trump’s presidential commission.

When Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicated last Friday some 13 Russians for trolling the Internet as the only evidence of “Russian Collusion” he could find after months of investigation that spent millions of dollars in taxpayer funds, the intelligence operative known as QAnon posted a preview of the DNI, DHS, and FBI conclusions.

As seen in this Internet posting, QAnon first cites Deputy Attorney General Rob Rosenstein’s statement in announcing the indictment involving the 13 Russian trolls that: “There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity.  There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

That comes close to sounding the death knell for the “Russian Collusion” mainstream media hysteria we have endured since the 2016 election as a Democratic Party “hate-Trump” narrative for impeachment.

Next, QAnon makes clear the DNI, DHS, and FBI study will prove massive Democratic Party voter fraud, including the allowing of several millions of illegal immigrants to vote in direct contradiction of voting laws across the country.

QAnon wrote the following, apparently citing the DNI, DHS, and FBI study to be released next month:

In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined in Special Counselor Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation …


… U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS (XXXX), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential elections of 2016, Senate elections of [x, y, and z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled.  We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

The QAnon post goes on to note the DHS will be submitting a final report to the White House, to the Department of Justice, and to other state and local agencies outlining findings next month.

The post further suggests that while the DNI, DHS, FBI study was limited to a sampling of 22 counties, the findings were so conclusive that a countrywide examination is mandated.

While these conclusions spell the likelihood of criminal investigations of voter fraud to be undertaken nationwide, the shocking results also suggest we will soon see massive changes to voter laws that will most likely include Voter ID requirements and an end to electronic voting machines that can be hacked such that results tabulated can be rigged.

The redactions avoid naming the Senate races that were altered by voter fraud, but most likely we may see some Senators either forced to undergo new elections or possibly to lose their seats illegally gained.

When the DHS final report is available in March, we should experience a “game-changing” moment in which the Democratic Party accusations of “Russian Collusion” are buried as Deep State propaganda and lies, to be replaced by a genuine recognition of what appears to be a developing truth, namely that for decades the Democratic Party has engaged in a clandestine policy of systematic and intentional voter fraud designed to prejudice election results in their favor.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VIDEO Once again, Mueller’s probe exposes wrongdoing during MB Obama era, 2012 – 2 Clinton Body Bags


WASHINGTON, USA - FEBRUARY 20: Alex Van der Zwaan arrives at the U.S. District Courthouse to plead guilty to charges of making false statements to investigators during Robert Mueller's FBI investigation into whether or not Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential elections in Washington, United States on February 20, 2018. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Feb 20, 2018 by Kit Daniels


Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s latest indictment of a London lawyer is based on supposed wrongdoing in 2012, during the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State.

“The lawyer is accused of misleading investigators about the last time he talked with Richard Gates, who was indicted in October with ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort over their consulting work in Ukraine,” reported Bloomberg. “Van Der Zwaan was questioned by U.S. authorities regarding his firm’s work in 2012 on behalf of the Ukraine Ministry of Justice.”

This is three years before Donald Trump announced his White House run. In other words, it’s another indictment of a foreign national based on activity DURING the Obama administration, just like the indictments of 13 Russian nationals for a troll campaign in 2014.

If Trump is deeply implicated in “Russian collusion,” as his enemies suggest, then how come most of the alleged wrongdoing happened on Obama’s watch?

And, interestingly enough, the Clinton State Dept. had an interest in Ukrainian politics in 2012.

From an Aug. 20, 2016 article in the NY Times, which predates the “Russian collusion” conspiracy theory:

Victor Pinchuk, a steel magnate whose father-in-law, Leonid Kuchma, was president of Ukraine from 1994 to 2005, has directed between $10 million and $25 million to the [Clinton] foundation. He has lent his private plane to the Clintons and traveled to Los Angeles in 2011 to attend Mr. Clinton’s star-studded 65th birthday celebration.

Between September 2011 and November 2012, Douglas E. Schoen, a former political consultant for Mr. Clinton, arranged about a dozen meetings with State Department officials on behalf of or with Mr. Pinchuk to discuss the continuing political crisis in Ukraine, according to reports Mr. Schoen filed as a registered lobbyist.

This, of course, isn’t to suggest the Van Der Zwaan indictment and these meetings are related, but it’s definitely worth investigating Clinton’s ties to Ukraine during that time, given the “pay to play” scheme she had going on with foreign officials.

So, while aiming at Trump, Mueller’s probe keeps hitting targets close to Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.

As Infowars reported, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made clear no one in the Trump campaign had any knowledge of Russian subversion pertaining to the recent indictments.

“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge,” he said. “The nature of the scheme was the defendants took extraordinary steps to make it appear that they were ordinary American political activists, even so far as to base their activities on a virtual private network here in the United States.”

And I reported in July, it seems as if Mueller’s probe is better suited for investigating Clinton than the allegations made against Trump.

For one thing, the entire investigation is packed with experts in organized crime rings and terrorism – not foreign relations and election fraud as one would expect if Trump were the target.


Witness says major cocaine deal led to murder of two teenagers


A 1980’s pro wrestler has bravely come forward to admit his role in the 1987 unsolved murder of two teenage boys in Saline County, Arkansas.

Billy Jack Haynes claims the murder of teenagers Kevin Ives and Don Henry was linked to a cocaine smuggling ring as he implicates a high ranking “criminal Arkansas politician” in the murder and massive cover-up.

Could this be credible evidence of the notorious Clinton Body Count?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VIDEO Dismantled Left Talking Points – Corrupt MSM Markets Gun Control Like Gay Marriage – Teachers Getting Armed

Nolte: Corrupt Media Markets Gun Control Like Gay Marriage — Say Goodbye to Your Civil Rights

20 Feb 2018 by John Nolte

The debate over gay marriage began with local conversations. Each of the 50 states would decide the issue on their own. After we discussed the matter amongst ourselves and everyone had a say, we would have ourselves a vote.

During this debate, we were assured and reassured that gay marriage would not affect us. All we want are our rights! All we want is equality! All we want is to be like you! It’s no skin off your nose! Over and over, we were promised this.

Pop culture also weighed in. TV,  movies, documentaries, and various news magazines, promised us that gay marriage would bring everyone together. Carefully manufactured depictions portrayed gay nuptials as a means for families and communities to heal old wounds while a sense of Happily Ever After descended over the land.

Then came the phony media polls that showed a majority in favor of gay marriage. But, as actual voting proved, those polls were rigged. In referendums all around the country, even California, gay marriage failed.

This is when the left’s mask came off.

After voting proved Americans were understandably uneasy about gay marriage, the left and their media allies showed their true selves. The era of discussion and democracy abruptly ended. Suddenly we were the targets of venomous hate campaigns, of boycotts. Even though we held the same view of gay marriage Barack Obama did just a few months earlier, the media sought to turn us into something socially unacceptable — we were ostracized, slapped with a scarlet letter as bigots, homophobes, and Nazis  who hid behind our evil Christianity.

Fast forward to 2018… And here we go again.

Americans do not want gun control. The media’s rigged polls might say different, but gun control was a major issue in 2016 and no doubt helped Hillary Clinton lose the pro-hunting states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Even after all the emotional blackmail and hysteria over Sandy Hook, the only politicians who lost their seats to gun control were those in favor of it.

When voters actually go out and vote, gun control is a loser. But if you take a look at the media landscape today, the same thing is happening that happened after it became apparent gay marriage would not succeed through the democratic process. The media is now manufacturing a reality that says those opposed to gun control are in the minority (false); therefore, anyone opposed to gun control is a socially unacceptable freak who want to see innocent children murdered.

This propaganda campaign, though, is the least of our concerns. What should worry us are the lies. The media continue to reassure us their gun control laws will not affect us, will not result in confiscation, will only keep guns away from evildoers. But like the gay marriage con, this is a lie.

After our robed masters on the Supreme Court imposed gay marriage on a populace that wanted no part of it (except in Maine and Maryland), immediately, all around the country, left-wing activists, backed by the media and fascist governments, started to persecute Christians — violating our First Amendment rights by making us choose between staying in business and betraying our religious conscience. Although same sex marriage is the sacrimentalization of a sin, the State is still forcing wedding cake artists, floral artists, and the like to participate in sin or face crippling sanctions.

The issue of gay marriage will also be the sword that eventually brings down the Christian church — which was always the left’s goal.

The same is  true of gun control. If the likes of CNN’s Jake Tapper can effectively exploit traumatized children as puppets to reiterate the same tired arguments that have already failed coming from his mouth, just as it is with gay marriage, the goal is to strip us of our civil rights — in this case, the civil right to protect ourselves — a right that is even more urgent given the catastrophic law enforcement failures regarding this latest school shooter.

The media’s current goal is not to convince the public. That will never happen. As with gay marriage, we know when we are being hustled. The media’s goal is to artificially increase social pressure to a point where lawmakers and judges feel they must do something, must be on the right side of history, must not accept the scarlet letter.

This propaganda campaign worked with gay marriage. The Supreme Court overturned the will of the people and Christians are now being persecuted by their own government.

That was always the gay marriage endgame, and a helpless populace is gun control’s endgame.

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNCFollow his Facebook Page here.

Columbine Survivor Turned State Rep. Pushing to Allow Armed Teachers

20 Feb 2018 by Awr Hawkins

Columbine attack survivor and Colorado House Minority Leader Patrick Neville (R-45) is a strong proponent of arming teachers for self-defense.

Neville was first elected to office in 2014 and has introduced his bill each year since that time without success. He hopes this year will be different because of the increased attention paid to the defenseless posture of unarmed teachers and staff.

The Washington Timesreports Neville’s contention that more Columbine students would have survived the April 20, 1999, Columbine attack if faculty and/or staff had been armed to take out the attackers. And he believes arming teachers now will protect future students from evil men who are planning attacks.

He described his legislation: “This act would allow every law-abiding citizens who holds a concealed carry permit, issued from their chief law-enforcement officer, the right to carry concealed in order to defend themselves and most importantly our children from the worst-case scenarios.”

Neville said he sees his legislation as something he can do “to prevent Colorado families from enduring the hardships my classmates and I faced that day [at Columbine].”

He noted that the common theme is mass shootings is not weapon type or magazine capacity, but “gun-free zones.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at Sign up to get Down Range at

250 Teachers Sign Up for 50 Seats at Concealed Carry Training Session

20 Feb 2018 by Awr Hawkins

Butler County, Ohio, Sheriff Richard K. Jones offered free concealed carry training for 50 teachers and 250 teachers responded within 24 hours.

Breitbart News reported that Jones began advertising the free training on Sunday and the immediate response was 50 emails within 20 minutes:

On February 20 Fox 91 reported the response had jumped to 250 teachers who wanted training. Jones reveled in the opportunity to instruct them, saying, “We have 250 and growing fast. We will start training fast, next week.”

He stressed that he wants teachers to understand what they can do with a gun if an armed attacker enters the classroom. And while he cannot delegate the authority for teachers to carry on a given campus–that is a school board decision–Jones said he wants the teachers to be ready if their school board so chooses.

He said, “If the school boards want to give the authority to teachers to be armed…[they] can do that, they have the authority to do it, but I’m going to do my part, and I assume I’m probably the only one in the state of Ohio that’s doing that – but something has to happen.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at Sign up to get Down Range at


‘All this talk about ‘assault weapons, assault guns,’ is total bul^^^t’

EPIC: Gun Owner Dismantles Left's AR-15 Talking Points in Viral Facebook Post

Feb 20, 2018


A video posted to Facebook Friday debunking the term “assault weapon” has gone mega viral.

Viewed nearly 7 million times at the time of publication, the video, created by Facebook user Danny Farnsworth, dismantles the myth that the AR-15 is any different than countless other rifles.

“Let me try to clear the air here a little bit,” Farnsworth begins. “All this talk about ‘assault weapons, assault guns,’ is total bullshit.”

Farnsworth continues by comparing an AR-15 and a small hunting rifle, noting that both weapons share the exact same capabilities and only differ in terms of cosmetics.

“A weapon that looks like this, people are super scared of,” Farnsworth says while holding up an AR-15.

“Yet this,” Farnsworth says while displaying the wooden rifle, “is totally fine. No problems.”

“I have news for you. These two guns are exactly the same weapon… the only difference in these two guns is the way it’s built with wood or plastic… that’s it!”

The gun enthusiast goes on to show how the AR-15’s magazine is compatible with the wooden rifle and notes that both fire only as fast as the trigger is pulled.

“But somehow this will be made illegal and this is fine, yet they are the exact same gun, Farnsworth adds. “So please, those people out there calling for bans, calling for ‘stop the assault rifles,’ you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.”

“Your ignorance is showing and it makes your argument moot.”

The video comes amid heightened debate over gun control in the wake of a tragic school shooting in Florida that took the lives of 17 people last week.

Unlike previous presidents, Donald Trump opted to put the focus on mental health during an address to the nation, drawing the ire of gun control proponents.

“It is not enough to simply take actions that make us feel like we are making a difference,” Trump said. “We must actually make that difference.”


Questions swirling around teen activist as odd videos surface

Student Anti-Gun Activist Featured In CBS News Story - Six Months Ago

Feb 20, 2018 by Dan Lyman

Multiple videos featuring David Hogg, a survivor of the mass shooting in Parkland, Fla., have surfaced amidst his rise to prominence as an anti-gun activist that have raised questions, including a television news report in California last year.

CBS Los Angeles featured Hogg as the eyewitness and videographer of a testy encounter between Hogg, a veteran Redondo Beach, Calif., lifeguard and a surfer, who was reportedly Hogg’s friend, in August of 2017.

Hogg claimed the lifeguard accosted his surfer friend over the issue of resting a sandy bodyboard on a beach trash can.

Interestingly, Hogg has reconnected with CBS for an appearance on CBS This Morning as the mainstream media unabashedly features high school students as figureheads for a new anti-gun push.

A CBS employee posted a photo of Hogg with fellow teen activists and CBS reporter Gisela Perez, which was later taken down after Kristinn Taylor of The Gateway Pundit reported on the photo shoot and how strange it seemed that all parties looked so cheerful and enthusiastic in the wake of such a tragedy.

“These photos were taken over the weekend on the set of an interview taped for broadcast Monday morning,” Taylor wrote. “This means the students were only three or four days out from surviving a massacre in their school. In just a few days they have become celebrated heroes of the anti-Trump resistance and are acting and being feted like rock stars.”

Additionally, another video has surfaced that appears to show Hogg being walked through rehearsed lines in an interview after the shooting.

Some have wondered if Hogg and fellow activist Emma Gonzalez were being coached through this strange interview on CNN in which both teens demanded the abolition of the National Rifle Association:

Hogg and company will be holding a town hall this week, which will be broadcast by CNN and moderated by Jake Tapper.

Hogg has become an overnight celebrity, appearing on international media outlets and television shows, vehemently calling for strict gun control, regularly slamming President Trump, and defending the FBI – of which his father is a retired agent, which many have found to be a peculiar coincidence as the FBI has come under fire for not preventing the Parkland massacre despite being warned about suspected killer Nikolas Cruz repeatedly beforehand.

The retired FBI dad is very significant,” asserts former Navy SEAL and commentator, Matt Bracken. “The FBI has been hiring SJW’s for years. It’s not just the 7th Floor of FBI HQ. It’s endemic.”

Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO Angel Mom begs Trump to keep promise of “No DACA” in Tweets and letters



Throughout Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, he often brought “angel families” to the stage and asked them to tell their stories at his rallies, as he made the case for “No Amnesty” and “Build the wall.” Agnes Gibboney was one of those angel parents on stage with Trump on multiple occasions.

Gibboney’s son, Ronald da Silva, was shot and killed by an illegal alien gang member, on April 27, 2002. On Jan. 28 she took a chocolate cake to the cemetery for her son’s 45th birthday, and felt the pain all over again of losing her son.

Now, as President Trump has come out in support of a DACA plan for illegal alien “dreamers,” Gibboney is on a mission, and she isn’t giving up. She’s been blasting President Trump with messages on Twitter almost daily, responding to his tweets with “No DACA” messages and begging him to keep his promises.

If Trump tweets about the economy, Gibboney tells him, “don’t ruin it by giving amnesty to illegal aliens.” If he tweets about wanting a deal for DACA, she tweets back with a definite “No DACA” message. Day after day, tweet after tweet, this angel mom is staying the course, begging the president to not let the angel families down.

Friday, President Trump tweeted, “Cannot believe how BADLY DACA recipients have been treated by the Democrats…totally abandoned! Republicans are still working hard.”

Gibboney tweeted back in reply, “Badly treated? How about the families of murdered victims? NO ONE CARES. AMERICANS FIRST. ENOUGH LAWLESSNESS. BUILD THE WALL, DEPORT ILLEGALS. E-VERIFY, NO AMNESTY. GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.”

Trump also tweeted Friday prior to departing for Florida, due to the horrific mass shooting. Gibboney responded with, “Prayers from one victim to another.

On Thursday, Gibboney responded to another tweet from Trump on DACA, telling him, “MERIT based DACA should be the ONLY way (if we must), the rest, DEPORT. WE SHOULD NEVER REWARD LAW BREAKERS. LET’S STAND UP FOR LAW. WHY WOULD WE WANT DISRESPECTFUL, DEMANDING DACA’S? AMNESTY has been given 7-8 times. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!”

Wednesday, Trump tweeted his condolences to the families of the school shooting victims, saying “no child, teacher or anyone else should ever feel unsafe in an American school.”

Gibboney tweeted back, “As the mother of a murdered victim, my heart goes out to the families. Their lives changed forever today.
May God give them strength to know and carry on as the new person they became today.”

Gibboney mailed a letter to President Trump last month, as the DACA issue was heating up, and wrote, “As a legal immigration myself, born in Budapest, Hungary, and an American citizen, I have suffered the worst pain of losing my only son, Ronald da Silva, 29 years old, murdered by a previously-deported illegal alien on April 27, 2002.

I feel let down by my country. Where was the protection for my son, for my family? Unfortunately, it is too late for Ronald, but it doesn’t have to be too late for anyone else.”

Her letter also stated:

Let’s not forget all the American citizens who were killed by those who should not have been in our country.

Let’s not forget that our loved ones had dreams. Dreams that were cut short. Let’s not forget that our families are the ones torn apart forever.

When illegal aliens say it’s not fair to be separated from their families, we say what is not fair is to have to bury our children and our loved ones. Now that is real separation of families.

The grieving mother is unbending in her tweets, fighting for her son, who she cannot save, but in hopes her efforts will help stop others from enduring the same loss.

Grave of Ronald da Silva, killed by illegal alien. His mother, Agnes Gibboney, took a cake to his grave in honor of his 45th birthday.

In an ad against illegal immigration posted on President Trump’s Facebook page on Jan. 20, Gibboney was featured in the last scene.

Below is a screenshot of the scene appearing in a recent ad by Trump, drawing recognition to illegal immigration, which featured Gibboney. She is still begging the president to keep his promise and NOT provide amnesty to illegal aliens.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO School Children in Danger Under MB Obama’s Fundamentally Transformed FBI

Tragically, no one’s children will be safe at school as long as things stay that way

School Children in Danger Under Obama’s Fundamentally Transformed FBI

Feb 19, 2018  By 

School Children in Danger Under Obama's Fundamentally Transformed FBI
The particulars about protecting innocents from mass murder at schools, concerts, marathons etc. are not part of FBI training.

The horrific Valentine’s Day massacre that took the lives of 17 students and teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, leaving 14 more injured, proves it.

There are some 35,000 employees (not all agents) working for America’s foremost intel agency and 5,800 working for Sheriff Scott Israel who, in Broward County, heads up one of the largest sheriff departments in the nation.

Both the FBI and Sheriff Israel missed the boat on catching self-professed school killer Nikolas Cruz—even though his intentions were twice handed to them on a silver platter.

And that’s only twice as far as we know.

In yesterday’s column, this corner lamented: “It is now clear that it’s not what the FBI tells you that matters, it’s what they don’t tell you.” (CFP, Feb. 17, 2018)

It’s true that the whistleblowers who tipped off the FBI about the clear and present danger of Nikolas Cruz were fobbed off.

That’s the role of the FBI and a well-equipped sheriff’s department on the mass murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

We should remember how Ryan Saavedra at DailyWire warned on Jan. 18, 2018 that “other suspects” are under investigation in the Oct. 1st massacre in Las Vegas.

“Up until Tuesday, the public has been told that the massacre in Las Vegas on October 1 was perpetrated by a lone gunman, although there have been numerous aspects of the case that have remained unexplained. Sheriff Joe Lombardo and the FBI attested that evidence indicated Stephen Paddock acted alone. (DailyWire, Jan. 18, 2018)

“But on Tuesday, inside a district courtroom, according to Fox 5 Las Vegas, an attorney for various media outlets argued that releasing information relating to the massacre was critical in order for Las Vegas residents to heal from the tragedy.

“The lawyer for Las Vegas Metro Police, Nicholas Crosby, later admitted something that was a bombshell revelation: other suspects are under investigation. Criminal charges may be filed in the coming weeks in the investigation into the Las Vegas massacre, the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.

“The Daily Mail reported that Clark County District Court Judge Elissa Cadish asked Crosby, “Without naming names, there are potential charges against others as a result of the ongoing investigation?”

“Yes,” Crosby replied, “There are charges being investigated.”

“A spokesperson for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department said they are “investigating possible criminal charges related to items discovered during the service of search warrants.”

“Law enforcement officials still have not released any information about a possible motive for the October 1, 2017 massacre that left 58 dead and approximately 500 more injured.”

Important to note that the DailyWire story remains on its news site.

We have a major problem here and it’s not Houston.

In short, the FBI of the current day is Barack Obama’s FBI

The good guys at the FBI (of which there must be some, if not many) are being suppressed while the bad ones don’t act on information that could stop mass murders and terrorists because their working lives are dedicated to having President Donald Trump removed from the office he was duly elected to serve.

Rather than being out on the manhunt for mass murderers, the FBI, like all politically correct driven agents of government are likely spending their time on:

  1. Gender sensitivity training;
  2. Minority sensitivity training;
  3. Sexual Harassment training;
  4. Global Warming/Climate Change training;
  5. Muslim Religious sensitivity training;
  6. ‘Snowflake’ Protection From Fiends training;
  7. Anger management training;
  8. Fill in the Blank for the newest Socialist-tainted cause of the Month.

Ask yourself how many on FBI management are tasked with supervising that training?

How many are liaising and organizing all the meetings and conferences?

Now winnow this down to the actual number of intel agents who are out there tracking down threats presenting a real and present danger to the citizenry.

And like many contemporary organizations, their reports, study groups, committees, sub committees are all set up to pass the file and pass the buck and talk about stuff, never actually DOING stuff.

Barack Hussein Obama, who spends his is passive time preening for digital images sent viral over the ‘Net and his active time fomenting for revolution as a gone-to-ground ‘Resistance Leader’ in a mansion within two short miles of the White House, had eight long years to “fundamentally transform” the FBI.

In short, the FBI of the current day is Barack Obama’s FBI.

Until this agency of which we once could all be so proud is purged and brought back to what it was before his election, it is Obama’s FBI we are seeing in inaction today.

Tragically, no one’s children will be safe at school as long as things stay that way.


The Russians Did Not Swipe the Election but Hillary Killed the FBI

The Russians Did Not Swipe the Election but Hillary Killed the FBI

The bottom line on the FBI’s dramatic Friday dump indictment of a St. Petersburg-based “troll farm” and 13 Russian nationals: on the same day the indictments were revealed ‘someone’ in the FBI began leaking the news that special counsel Robert Mueller is still investigating “possible collusion” in the Trump camp.—More…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Dem Senator warns Mueller not to release his final report before the 2018 midterms

Scared much?

Dem Senator warns Mueller not to release his final report before the 2018 midterms

Feb 19, 2018 By 

Dem Senator warns Mueller not to release his final report before the 2018 midterms - because they want the non-issue kept alive
If the Democrats – oh, sorry, I mean “the totally unbiased and ideologically pure Robert Mueller” really had the goods on Trump colluding with Russians, they’d want you to know about.  It would do nothing but serve their 2018 narrative to have that information available to the public.  They’d put it in their ads, mention it on every TV broadcast, and use it as the central plank in their midterm platform.  “Elect us, and we’ll impeach the Russian conspirator.”

This weekend, we learned that’s not what they want.  In fact, they want Mueller to keep the results of his investigation to himself, at least until after the next election. As The Hill reports, Democrat Senator, Bob Casey (PA), is actually warning Mueller not to release his findings this summer…

Speaking to radio host John Catsimatidis on New York radio station AM 970, Casey said he couldn’t make any assumptions about where the Mueller investigation is going in light of indictments issued on Friday. But he added that he would recommend Mueller not release a report on his findings near the midterms, when it would distract from elections or cause people to question the election’s integrity.

“I don’t think we’ll know anywhere near the full story until [Mueller] issues his report,” Casey said. “But once you get into the summer, and you get close to the election, I think it’s a mistake for him to release it late. I think you should wait until after [the election]” Casey said.

Now, I suppose you could concoct a scenario where Dems think their Republican opponents would use a damning Mueller report to rile up the Trump base and turn out their voters. Think something along the lines of “Vote Republican or Trump is toast.”  That seems incredibly far-fetched to me.

If Mueller revealed genuine evidence of Russian collusion, the American people – Trump supporters included – would be furious. It would decimate their midterm plans. So, I don’t buy that Casey is worried about “distraction” or “integrity.”  Dems have never cared about those things before, and they’re not going to start now.

No, I suspect that they’re scared that there’s no fire beneath all the Russian smoke.

Friday’s “revelations” about a few dozen internet trolls being funded with $1.2 million of Russian money was a major nothingburger. Democrats are trying to put a good face on it, but the fact is they were hoping for much, much more – and, yes, they were hoping to have it before the midterms.

If they’ve decided to start “warning” Mueller not to release his findings before the midterms, it’s a good indication that they know his report will be politically worthless.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment