Notice:There’s a separation between Mosque and State

July 22, 2016 By Diane Weber Bederman


For those who many not be aware, there is in Canada a separation between mosque and state. Our public school system is secular. As in non-religious affiliated. Except on Ontario where we have a Catholic system that dates back to the BNA Act of 1867. The beauty of Canada is that all religions are treated equally. No one religious group getting better treated than another. We are home to all kinds of houses of worship-Zoroastrian, Baha’i, Catholic, Protestant, Hindi, Sikh, Buddhist, Mormon, Jehovah’s Witness, Seventh Day Adventist, Mennonites, and Jewish. Someone please refresh my memory but have any of these groups ever make demands of Canada to accommodate their needs, their religious belief systems, their food at public institutions?

And if our Charter of rights is being abused to turn our schools into places of worship then we Canadians must fight back. Christians have watched as Christmas plays have been stopped, the Lord’s Prayer removed, reading the Bible prohibited despite the fact that the ethic that underpins Canada comes from the Bible. No religion must be in public school; particularly when it is for one particular religion whose ethic contravenes our ethic.

And yet we have Muslim prayers in our public schools. How many schools are doing this? I don’t know. One is one too many. There are calls for prayer rooms-for Muslims in our public schools. Are there prayer rooms for Jews or Christians? Jewish people are to pray three times a day. Have they made demands on the public school system?

Walter Piovesan, the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board associate director of education said, “While there may be no dedicated (Prayer) room, there is a duty to accommodate under the Ontario Charter of Human Rights.” There is a duty to accommodate teaching a religion in our publicly funded(as in all tax-payers) schools whose ethic is diametrically opposed to the values taught in our country when we have removed Christianity from the system?

Washed Ahmed, Islamic director of Carleton University’s Muslim Students’ Association, who leads a prayer service at more than half a dozen public high schools in Ottawa on Fridays wants to see more co-operation between religious groups and school boards to help fund permanent multi-faith prayer rooms in Ottawa schools. Who is doing this funding exactly? The Jewish families? The Catholic families The Protestant families? How about secular families? Are they supposed to help fund Muslim prayer at public school? This is our new Canada?

Carleton student Maged Arab, 23, who said without a permanent prayer room, Muslims have to either find a quiet place at school or else cram in all five of their daily prayers into their evenings. “Thankfully, if there’s no prayer room, you’re excused and you can catch up on all the prayers when you get home from school,” he said.

You are excused from prayer? Really?  So why are we accommodating this? To what end?

Abdulaziz Dahir, 27, who had attended Sir Robert Borden High School was thankful to be able to take part in the Friday prayer in one of the school’s English classes.

“Looking back now, we would have wanted more time to pray at school but back then we were just happy to have a room at all,” he said. Looking back he wanted more prayer time?  Really? And we should accommodate his desire for more PRAYER TIME at a public school.

It is Valley Park Middle School in Thorncliffe Park in Toronto that is most troubling. The cafeteria has been turned into a mosque for noon-day prayer on Fridays Girls are segregated from the boys. The Muslim ideology taught at this school comes from the conservative Sunni ideology.

Gerri Gershon, a Trustee for Don Valley West, where Valley Park Middle School is located said “I think that what we’re doing is what we should be doing as a school board and that is accommodating students’ needs no matter what their religion is.”  But secular schools are not associated with any religion! If prayer is that important to these people why do they not attend a private Muslim school? Jewish families send their children to private school as do many Christians.

We also need to be aware of those who are consulting with our school boards like Dr. Abdullah Hakim Quick who has “developed and facilitated workshops and training sessions for diverse organizations such as Children’s Aid Society, Metropolitan Toronto School Boards, Family Service Association of Metro Toronto, Canadian Museums Association, Canadian Institute for International Affairs, the Canadian Churches Forum for Global Ministries, Elementary Teachers Association of York Region, Metro Toronto School for the Deaf and the Scarborough Public Library Board.” He supports bringing Spain back into the Caliphate. He advises Muslim students in Canada to spread Islam throughout the land that it is their “duty that applies to all Muslims and a key to reach the end goal, which is the establishment of the Caliphate that follows the guidance of Prophet-hood. He called upon them to spread the message of Islam in order to gradually Islamize the society, and in his words: ‘so the people of the soil itself accept Islam.’”

Ali Baig, a parent at Valley Park Middle School who promotes the Muslim prayers at Valley Park Middle School said that “Canada’s education system is very Christian and nobody challenges it.” Well by all means challenge the Christian part. Demand an end to all religious practice in the public, secular school system. I have to assume he has no idea that our culture, our constitution, our ethic, comes from the Jewish Bible that was then passed forward by Christians. I have to assume he has no idea that the Judeo/Christian ethic underpins our country, our freedoms including freedom of religion; hence Christianity was taught. But Baig has this worked out. He studied up on his rights. He pointed out that under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, “Muslims have the right to practise their religion as they see fit.”  Even if their teachings and their prayers performed in our secular public schools go against our laws that deny gender separation?

More importantly, we are separating one group of children from all the others in the public school system.  We are saying “these children are special, different.” These Muslim children are being denied the right to learn how to be part of a secular society by Liberal Progressives, who, in their desire to be seen as open and accommodating are sentencing Muslim children to a different life than all the other children, particularly immigrant children, in our open and tolerant society. If they do not learn this at school, where will they learn these values?

And now the Federal government is funding Islam by granting hundreds of thousands of dollars to build a mosque in Kitchener, which of course had led to other groups requesting that the municipal government fund their mosque-in Woodstock Ontario, a small southwestern Ontario city, hoping to build the first mosque in its city.  Are our governments funding Islamic centers and pushing for Islamic prayers in public spaces because Muslims are taught that there is no separation between mosque and State? They not only expect the government to pay for these things, they demand it?

We are giving away our hard fought freedoms by allowing people to abuse our Charter, and too many Canadians in the name of tolerance are letting this happen. We must take back our Constitution and reverse the perverse interpretations by lawyers of the Charter for Rights and Freedoms so that all children in Canadian schools learn how to get along with one another in a secular world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VIDEO Trump, Pence Blast DNC Speakers ‘Not One of Them Named ISIS’ – Christians Must Stand Up To Islam – European Revolt

Trump, Pence Blast DNC Speakers ‘Not One of Them Named ISIS’

Republican nominee Donald Trump and his running mate Indiana Gov. Mike Pence criticized the Democratic Party for not talking about the threat of terrorism and ISIS during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Monday night.

During an appearance at the VFW on Tuesday morning, Pence recalled the speakers at the DNC on Monday, saying, “It is extraordinary to think yesterday in Philadelphia, 61 speakers came to the podium and not one of them named ISIS by name.”

“This man,” Pence declared, referencing Trump, “will name our enemies without apology and he will defeat them.”

The Democratic Party chose not to discuss the increasing amount of terrorism on the first night of its convention in Philadelphia — instead focusing on climate change among other issues — despite there having been at least five terrorist attacks in Germany and France in just one week.

Marion Le Pen: Christians Must Stand Up To Islam; Young Patriots Should Join The Military Like Me

Marion Maréchal Le Pen, the 26-year-old niece of France’s Front National leader Marine Le Pen has urged her fellow countrymen to join the military in a series of tweets following the beheading of a priest in Normandy this morning.

Reacting to the incident, Ms. Le Pen took to her Twitter account to double down on her message from just a few days before, and just after the attacks in Nice.

She said on Sunday: “Either we kill Islamism or it will kill us again and again. You are with us and against Islamism, or you are against us and for Islamism… Those who choose the status quo become complicit with our enemies.”

Her comments today herald yet another ramping up of her party’s action against Islamism and the threat faced by ordinary French people.

She said: “Faced with the threat that weighs on the France, I decided to join the military reserve. I invite all the young patriots to do the same,” followed by: “In the West as in the East, Christians must stand up to resist Islam!”

She added: “They kill our children, murdering our policemen and slaughter our priests. Wake up!”

Marine Le Pen’s approval ratings rose after the Nice attacks, though the media chose instead to focus on how the current President who faces an election next year, Francois Hollande, remained popular.

Marion Le Pen, who is a deputy (or Member of Parliament) in the Vaucluse region, has become an increasingly important figure in her party and in French politics lately.

In an interview with the Telegraph, she said radical Islam is implacably opposed to the French secular way of life, stating: “We have a heritage of faith linked to secularity, and I would always defend that. It’s quite opposite to the radical Islamic faith, which seeks to impose itself more and more on public life.”

She continued: “The attacks that took place in France at the Bataclan [in Paris last November] were carried out by terrorists who infiltrated their way into the flood of immigrants arriving from Greece.

“Free movement of goods and people is a way of feeding terrorism. France’s migration policy has contributed to the explosion of radical Islam here and to the genesis of those terrorists who are born in France.”

A devout Catholic, she defends comments made some time ago in which she said that “Islam should not have the same public space as Catholicism.

“We have traditions, cultural influences that are Christian. France is not an Islamic country, and Islam should not have the same place in public life.”

But she draws a distinction between the secular world of French politics and personal religion, insisting: “I make a big distinction between my political combat and my faith. I never mix the two.”

This morning an elderly priest was murdered in a hostage situation in a church south of Rouen, Normandy, northern France by Islamist attackers.

France’s Le Figaro reported the eye-witness account of a nun who managed to escape the Normandy church this morning while it was under attack by Islamist killers in order to raise an alarm.

The paper states that one of the “executioners” gave “an Arabic sermon from the altar”, and that deceased Father Jacques Hamel was forced to kneel before the men went for his throat with a knife.

Tommy Robinson: The ‘Religion of Peace’




Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Germany No Longer Safe? – History of Terrorism: Munich 1972 and 2016

Germany No Longer Safe?


July, 25, 2016


German officials are left wondering ‘where is safety?” in the wake of two terror attacks in less than a week.

German police are  beginning their investigation into the Munich mall shooting that killed nine people.

“With regard to the suspect we have to examine everything, but we don’t know yet what triggered the crime,” sad Peter Beck, a Munich police spokesman.

While German officials  are at a loss for words about the attacker’s motives,  they are nearly certain it was not another example of Islamic terrorism.  German interior minister Thomas De Maiziere says there is “no indication of any connection to international terrorism” in the Munich attack.  The suspect, who killed himself before Police had a chance to stop him, had no prior criminal records, making him virtually undetectable by security agencies.

Munich police chief Hubertus Andrae says “no evidence” of links to the Islamic State group has been found in the home and room of the Munich shooting suspect.

Instead, poice chief Andrae says the suspect appeared to be “obsessed with shooting rampages.” The suspect appears to have been planning a mass shooting for some time.

German prosecutor Steinkraus Koch told a news conference the suspect had a book titled: “Rampage in Head: Why Students Kill.” Perhaps what is even more concerning is that the shooter knew how to manipulate social media to lure more potential victims to the mall.

Munich police investigator Robert Heimberger says the shooter hacked a Facebook account and sent a message urging people to come to the mall for a free giveaway.

The posting, sent from a young woman’s account, urged people to come to the mall at 4 p.m., saying: “I’ll give you something if you want, but not too expensive.”

Heimberger says: “It appears it was prepared by the suspect and then sent out.”

As the police continue to search for answers, Germany is left to mourn.

Dieter Reiter, the mayor of Munich has declared a day of mourning for the victims of Friday’s shooting, saying the city is “shocked and aghast at this terrible act.”

“These are difficult hours for Munich,” he said, adding that the city’s citizens had shown great solidarity toward each other. “Our city stands united.”

But not only is Germany unified in mourning, many citizens share the same concern — Germany may no longer be safe.

Chancellor Angela Merkel  told reporters in Berlin on Saturday that an attack on a train on Monday night and Friday night’s deadly rampage in Munich had involved “places where any of us could have been” and have left Germans wondering “where is safe?”

Combined with the deadly attack in the French city of Nice and other major Western cities around the world, she said people are growing increasingly concerned.

“Such an evening and such a night is difficult to bear,” she said of the Munich attack. “And it’s even more difficult to bear because we have had so much terrible news in so few days.”

original here

History of Terrorism: Munich 1972 and 2016


The long history of German incompetence in the face of Islamist terrorism

July 25, 2016 

We all know about Germany under Angela Merkel deciding to admit about a million immigrants from lands where jihadism, Sharia law, terrorism and hatred of women, Jews and gays are endemic.

Most of know that on New Years’ Eve last, some 1000 of the recent immigrants, predominantly young males from a culture of rape, began sexually assaulting hundreds of German young women in Cologne.

Fewer know that German police took days to acknowledge the extent of the mass rapes and sexual attacks and in this they and the German media have been following the lead of Sweden whose police and media, according to a recent article in Britain’s The Spectator, have been actively covering up the facts on the nature and extent of Muslim sexual attacks on their women.

German police declared within one day that the German-Iranian shooter who killed 9, including children, in the Munich mall attack this week acted alone, and inferred that this was mental illness not terrorism.

This happened during a period where police and security services were on “high alert” due to information about a possible terrorist attack.   Unlike most shooters who are killed on site as they continue to shoot, this shooter was found a kilometer away from the mall, and police quickly said that not only did he act alone but that it was suicide.   He had been walking around with a Glock 17 semi-automatic handgun and 300 rounds of ammunition in his rucksack.   I ask whether it is reasonable to accept such a fast conclusion from police that it was suicide and not terrorism.

I do not understand why the country that makes Mercedes cars that can drive themselves cannot, during a period of high alert, protect public gatherings, or find a shooter in a dense urban environment and must rely on the killer committing suicide a kilometer away – unless of course your ideology says all Muslims are culturally equal to all Western Europeans and that it is appropriate to accept a million mostly unvetted, mostly Muslim, migrants during wartime (radical Islam has declared war, and Hollande accepts this but not Obama and it would seem that Merkel does not accept it either).  The ideology of tolerance (which I term “tolerism” in my book of that title) says that tolerance and compassion and empathy, and yes, “submission” to a million demographic soldiers of the Islamic retaking of Europe, will somehow ease the problem.

The perpetrator shouted, “Allahu Akbar” —  the terrorist battle-cry.   Munich police chief Hubertus Andrae, however, told a news conference there were no indications the gunman had links with ISIS, identifying the attack as a “classic shooting rampage” and not terrorism.    Why do we insist that we are only worried about links to ISIS and not links to cultural jihadism and conquest?

Police were quick to emphasize that the shooter also shouted that he was a “German”, all but ignoring that he, or perhaps his parents, was, or were, from Iran, the major terrorist exporting nation in the world.   Even if he was not directed by Iranian terrorists, one cannot say that he was not inspired by the constant anti-western propaganda and warlike statements coming out of Iran.   One would think that Germany, in light of its crimes during the Nazi era but also due to its role in selling chemicals to Iraq and Syria for its chemical weapons program, and, as disclosed in a report by the World Nuclear Organization, providing 24% of the parts for the Iranian Busheir 1 nuclear plant, be more diligent in pursuing world peace by stopping its tolerance for Islamic warmongers.

The purpose of this article is to re-examine the 1972 terrorist attacks in Munich and reflect on the Munich mall Islamist terrorist attack . For it is my contention that a review of the facts will disclose that the undue tolerance and political correctness sweeping Europe has made it very difficult to protect Germans, as well as their visitors, from Islamist violence.

Let us examine the historical context of the murder of the Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.  Eight Palestinians from a terrorist organization called Black September, a group within Yasser Arafat’s Fatah and PLO, took Israeli athletes hostage at the Munich Olympics, and, in the course of the attack, 11 Israelis and one German police officer were killed.

While terrorist attacks have become very common, we must remember that the Munich massacre was something much more unique at the time.  Author Steven Reeve, who did a 2001 study of the attack and its aftermath, writes that Munich was one of the most significant terror attacks of recent times, in that it “thrust the Palestinian cause into the world spotlight, set the tone for decades of conflict in the Middle East, and launched a new era of international terrorism.”   And as Arab Muslims continued to find terrorism useful to attain the support of Europeans and the United Nations, then it was sure to follow that terrorism would be used against the West.

Accordingly, it must be understood how incompetent was the response of the German authorities and how mild was the response of the International Olympic movement.

Two of the Israelis were killed immediately upon the hostage-taking.  The hostage-takers then demanded the release and transfer to Egypt of a large number of Palestinians and others jailed in Israel.   Israel’s response was absolute – no negotiations with terrorist murderers.   Israel offered to send a special forces unit to Germany to try to free the hostages, but Germany refused.  Instead Germany undertook an operation which was so incompetent that it would be laughable if the consequences hadn’t been so tragic.  (We must credit the Germans, however, with the moral step of offering to the Palestinians a substitution of some high-ranking Germans in place of the Israelis, which the Palestinians refused.)

First, the Germans dispatched to the Olympic village some members of the border-police, completely untrained in any sort of counter-terrorist response, and without any plan of attack.  They took up positions, awaiting orders that never came.  Second, German television camera crews starting filming the police squad on the roof of a building, and once the terrorists saw the footage on television, and showed they knew where the police were, the operation was abandoned.

The German authorities pretended to give in to the terrorists’ demand for transportation to Cairo;  but instead of taking them to the international airport, the Germans transported them to a military airbase, where they planned to attack them.

The Germans selected five snipers, but none of them had any special training and were only chosen because they shot competitively on weekends.    A Boeing jet was positioned on the tarmac, and the Germans placed five or six armed police, dressed as flight crew, in the plane.  They were to overpower the terrorists who would be inspecting the plane, and the other snipers were to kill the remainder of the terrorists who would be in the helicopters which delivered them from the Olympic site.  The armed police, however, again had no counter-terrorism training, and at the last moment just as the helicopters arrived, the police panicked and voted among themselves to abandon their mission, which they did, without even contacting their central command.   When the terrorist leaders inspected the empty jet, they knew they had been duped, and a chaotic scene ensued.  But the German snipers, who had no radio contact with each other, and hence no coordination of their efforts, were not even equipped with steel helmets or bullet-proof vests.  In the end all of the hostages were killed, and all but three of the terrorists.

After a one-day suspension, the Games continued.  At a memorial service, IOC President Avery Brundage spoke about the strength of the Olympic movement, but chose not to refer to the slain Israeli athletes!  And the Arab nations objected to a plan to fly flags at half mast!

The bodies of the five Palestinians who were killed were, for some reason, delivered to Libya, where they received heroes’ funerals with full military honors.   The three surviving terrorists were jailed, but less than two months later, a German Lufthansa jet was hijacked and the Germans quickly traded two of the terrorists for release of the hijacked plane.

We should understand that 9/11 and the various terrorist attacks in Europe are part of the same problem that Israel faces.  Sadly, the European Left (and increasingly the American Left) seeks to distinguish the two and continues to work to sacrifice Israel to the Islamist beast, in the hopes that it will be sated and not come after them.

The tolerant elites of Europe have ignored all history, and welcomed some one million migrants into Germany alone, from Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia and other dysfunctional Muslim countries.    Britain’s Express newspaper (consisting of the Daily Express and the Sunday Express) reported in February on a leaked government report that the refugees to Germany (numbering some one million people) committed some 200,000 crimes last year!   Most were minor crimes, but some were murders, assaults, thefts, sexual assaults, etc.   It takes a special kind of ideology of naïve faith in tolerance (which I term tolerism) to destroy the safety of your own people in favor of some notion of “rights” of migrants, most of whom were inadequately vetted.

Significantly, German security forces have been on alert since a teenage migrant stabbed and injured five people on a train in Bavaria on Monday, in an attack claimed by so-called Islamic State.

The authorities had warned of the danger of further incidents.  Yet, to the best of my knowledge, German authorities are not implementing what Israel did way back in 2001, where those entering malls are checked for weapons by highly trained security guards.   Not checking, not understanding the difference between mental illness and cultural incitement, 24 hour conclusions ruling out “terrorism”, are all signs of incompetence.  Incompetence to save Israeli athletes in 1972 and incompetence to save their own people in 2016.  And the reason for the incompetence is the foolish ideology adopted by the children and grandchildren of Nazi murderers that the problem of terrorism was a deserved problem of the Israeli Jews and that it wasn’t their problem.

History of Terrorism: Munich 1972 and 2016

History of Terrorism: Munich 1972 and 2016

merkel defiler

Erdogan Merkel—-


BREAKING: 6 or More Dead, Several Wounded in Terror Attack Occurring NOW in Munich…UPDATE: Photos…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Trump’s Secret Weapon Needed to Defeat Hillary – “Guilty As Hill” – Trump Surge – DNC

Trump’s Secret Weapon Needed to Defeat Hillary

July 23, 2016 by Dave Hodges


teflon hillary

I do not trust polls because I understand the psychology of polls, derived from the Tavistock Institute, and how they are used to mold public behavior and change perception and subsequently voting behavior. I have previously written an article on not trusting any polls that one reads because they are all globalist polls designed to discredit Donald Trump in the eyes of the voting public.

However, there is a recent establishment poll, conducted by one of the mouthpieces of the New World Order, The Washington Post, which we should all sit up and take notice of.

The poll is an establishment poll on an establishment candidate. The results show that the establishment candidate, Hillary Clinton, is in very deep trouble. With regard to her email scandal, Clinton may have avoided court, but she has seemingly lost the battle of her perceived integrity in the court of public opinion.

The Establishment Poll on the Establishment Candidate

The Clinton campaign is in very deep trouble. The most recent poll contained in a Washington Post article headlined “The Continuing Political Decline of Hillary Clinton.” The article states that, “it’s hard to overstate just how bad Clinton’s numbers are. And a new Washington Post-ABC News poll is the latest to suggest they just keep getting worse…”

In this latest poll, there are two statistics that should concern every American.

  • 57% of registered voters have an unfavorable view of Clinton
  • 47% have a “strongly unfavorable view”.

The subsequent categories of “Strongly unfavorable” view has reached new heights. Stunningly, the majority of voters think that Hillary Clinton is someone that cannot be trusted. By an incredible margin of 72-21% voters think that Clinton is very untrustworthy, according to the study, “too willing to bend the rules.”

What should be equallly disturbing in these polling results is something what the poll did not consider. Hillary does not have the legitimate ammunition to throw up against Trump’s attacks on her intergrity and subsequent criminal behavior. She has accomplished nothing in her life. She has accomplished nothing as a politician. In contrast to Trump, she has not created one job. She has not created nothing that has helped one middle-class American. Her only option is to wage a campaign based upon extreme negativity, and we are already seeing this where Clinton is playing an anti-Trump ad which takes every flippant thing Trump  has said and makes it into a 30 second sound bite of perceived Trump insanity. But in terms of claiming accomplishment, she is like the football coach that can run nothing but trick plays because their team is substandard.

Why Would the Establishment Overtly Signal Clinton’s Flaws and Release the Findings?

Seemingly, the answer to this question has many possibilities. However, the most likely possibility is that this poll is serving a clarion call to all establishment institutions that they must redouble their efforts or they risk losing all of their ill-gotten gains as they will be stopped from plundering the American public by a Trump presidency.

Very shortly, I  look for every establishment outlet to attack Donald Trump. If you thought the Republican Primary was negative, in terms of establishment media coverage, you have not seen anything yet.

Teflon Hillary

teflon hillary 2Ordinarily, these polling numbers, for an establishment candidate, coming from an establishment poll, would be fatal their campaign. However, if Hillary were a cat, she would have 90 lives, instead of nine. Every criminal act she has committed seems to just slide right off of her. Just like, her husband in-name-only, Bill Clinton, nothing sticks as the Clinton crime syndicate continues to roll right along.

Clinton has two secret weapons. First, she has a criminal administration, in the form of Obama, Lynch and Comey, that is willing to protect her in order to preserve the status quo. She has the defense industry and the banks on her side, because she will clearly start wars for profit for these institutions that Eisenhower labeled “the military industrial complex”. She has the welfare crowd, as well as the illegal immigrants on her side as well. Her second secret weapon has to do with the Stanford University study that clearly showed that in states that used only electronic voting machines, this helped Clinton gain a 9% advantage over the election exit polling. Perhaps the best indicator is how the swing states, such as Ohio, Florida, California, etc., will lean, will be based upon how many of these states use electronic voting machines. The Stanford study suggests that in these states, Trump would have to win by 10% in order to win by 1%.

Trumps Secret Weapon

Trump needs to attack Clinton where she is the weakest. I love it when Trump calls Clinton, ?crooked Hillary”. These references are accurate and humorous. However, this needs to stop. The voters will reject this blatant negativity. Trump should point out her criminal behaviors and failure of leadership with concrete examples without resorting to name-calling.

As I have pointed out, Clinton can only wage a negative campaign. This article with this observation will somewhat inoculate the voting public who reads this. Eventually, the public will grow weary of her negative antics and the election could become a landslide victory for Trump. Even the most ultimate liberal, movie producer, Michael Moore, stated that Trump is going to win. He sees what I see.

For Trump, he should take the high road and attack Clinton where she has no defense, Trump has to focus on the voter’s pocketbooks. Namely, Trump needs to do a better job of explaining the devastation brought about by the free-trade agreements. He has mentioned he is going to stop them. However, Trump needs to realize that 75% of the population is so dumbed down that they don’t fully understand how a free trade agreement impacts them. Below in the short clip, I describe the devastation of the free trade agreements.



If Trump will stick to the high road, and appeal to people’s pocketbooks, he will be successful. There is one more secret weapon that Trump followers can employ and that is the power of collective prayer. Ask that God’s will be done. God will honor this request because I am quite certain that God will not honor the Democratic Party if he has a choice. The Democratic Party is anti-Christian and stands for the right to murder babies. Could a just God support a party that thinks it is ok to support the genocide of 60 million babies since the 1970’s?

original here

CNN poll Trump leads Clinton after RNC


Democrats Can’t Manage Convention, Want to Run Nation

Wikileaks Crashes The DNC

“Guilty As Hill” With Special Guest AF Branco

July 23, 2016


I’m proud to have my friend, political cartoonist AF Branco as my guest in this episode. Click the image tobuy his book…  Awesome bathroom literature.

We are witnessing what happens when Liberals are allowed to run things on the global stage. Total freaking anarchy—we have collapsing economies, widespread lawlessness, political riots, race riots and now… Jihad of the Week.

And the people who brought us this crap are not serious about fixing anything—just power.  These are the same ones who tell us “man-made climate change is our number one threat…..”if we fight back, the Terrorists will only get mad. Now they want to give us Hillary.

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 3.31.58 PM

An oscar winning performance, indeed…

Can I get a big “HELL NO”?

It blows me away…they claim they could find no ‘intent’ on behalf of Hillary….At least 60 companies that lobbied the State Department during Clinton’s tenure as Secretary…donated a total of $26 million to the Clinton Foundation.  This is not a smoking gun?

Of course the Fix is in.  That’s why Trump has to WIN BIG.  If it ain’t close—they can’t cheat. If it IS close, you can bet your donkey they’ll cheat.

DEyY2pmSVuTqkIXwcp7C_Star Trek Dog Combo

“Guilty as Hill” with special guest AF Branco

hillary bin laden

hillary fees rapist

hillary debbie car

bernie hillary sell out



WHITES ORDERED TO BACK OF CROWD AT BLACK DNC MARCH “White people to the back, black people to the front!”


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VIDEO 18 Valid Reasons Why I Carry A Gun – Dems NAILED On Gun Control

18 Valid Reasons Why I Carry A Gun


Truth About Guns

The world is unpredictable – here are 18 reasons to carry a gun. 

There are many valid reasons to carry a gun and thankfully some citizens are able to exercise concealed carry practices.

Since 2013, carrying a concealed handgun in public has been permitted in all 50 states so we’ve compiled an extensive list of 18 valid reasons people carry a gun.

1. Concealed handguns deter crime.

Gun Facts

States that implemented “shall-issue” concealed carry laws decreased murders by 8.5 percent.

2. As a responsible citizen, I have the right to arm myself against criminals with guns.

3. Carrying a handgun can protect people who cannot always rely on police forces for protection.

Wintery Knight

4. A concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.

John R. Lott Jr., PhD studied states that passed the concealed carry laws during for 19 years. The number of multiple-victim public shootings declined by 84 percent.

5. My right to carry a gun could be lost if I don’t practice it.

Federalist Papers

6. I’m a first responder.

Berretta’s blog made a good point to say everyone is first responder. Whether you’re in law enforcement or just a regular guy, you may be the first person at the scene unwillingly.

7. I just want to be safe.

The Well Armed Woman

8. It’s vigilance, not paranoia.

People who aren’t advocates of concealed carry might think individuals who carry a gun are paranoid. In reality, people who choose to carry guns don’t do it because they live in fear, but because they want to take responsibility for their own safety.

9. Being armed makes unarmed citizens safer.


10. I have the right to choose to carry.

11. The world is not a safe place, and safety is not guaranteed.

12. Self protection is important.


13. I carry to protect my family and loved ones.

14. Physically, it’s challenging to defend myself.

15. Training with a handgun can inform everyone and be sure they are well prepared.

training handguns
Level 1 Firearms

16. I’m more careful when carrying a gun.

When carrying a gun, avoiding trouble and taking the high road is the way to go.

17. My neighborhood can be dangerous.

18. Carrying is easier than ever with plenty of comfortable concealed holsters.

If you were considering to apply for a concealed carry permit these 18 valid reasons may help with your decision process.

Watch  video at original here

Democrats NAILED On Gun Control

Chalk up another bomb load in the pickle barrel for James O’Keefe and Project Veritas!


“You have to take that sort of moderate… ‘We just wanna have common sense legislation so our children are safe!’” Bayer told the reporter, adding, “You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.” Bayer also admitted Hillary “for sure” would support banning guns, and said the only way to actualize that goal would be to “get Democrats in office.”

As Bugs Bunny would say: “you realize that this means war.”

original here

Undercover Video Confirms Hillary’s Strategy to Ban All Firearms

Undercover Video Confirms Hillary’s Strategy to Ban All Firearms

July 26, 2016  by  Bob Adelmann



The first 57 seconds of James O’Keefe’s latest undercover video interview, of a Clinton delegate from California, confirms what many have long suspected: Hillary Clinton’s real goal of complete and total confiscation of all firearms from every American citizen is being hidden behind benign and persuasive phrases such as “common sense gun control” and “protect our families,” etc.

It also reveals what happens when the “useful idiot” in the video learns that she has been exposed for what she is: a mouthpiece for the movement to disarm America and ultimately turn it into a totalitarian state.

Most importantly it reveals just how closely the Clinton campaign is following Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in its attempt to install a totalitarian government (impossible without total gun confiscation) in the United States.

First: O’Keefe and his Project Veritas. In 2006, 22-year-old O’Keefe cut his teeth by secretly recording verbal encounters with staffers in Planned Parenthood clinics. Those encounters revealed various violations of law that exposed the group and hurt its credibility nationally. In 2009, he used the same strategy — undercover videotaping of encounters with staffers — to expose ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now).

In those videos O’Keefe uncovered evidence of efforts by staffers to avoid detection by law enforcement for the crimes of tax evasion, human trafficking, and child prostitution. Following these revelations Congress voted to freeze federal funding for the group, forcing it into bankruptcy in 2010.

Two weeks ago O’Keefe’s group uncovered the hypocrisy of anti-gunners by going to their homes, representing themselves as members of a faux anti-gun group, and asking if they would be willing to post “gun-free zone” signs on their property, in keeping with their public positions supporting such zones. The group could not find a single instance where an anti-gunner would be willing to post such a sign.

On Monday Alex Jones posted O’Keefe’s latest undercover encounter, with a Clinton delegate, on the issue of gun control. The video can be seen below:

The “journalist/reporter” from Project Veritas Action (PVA) posed as a caucus supporter and approached California Democrat delegate Mary Bayer in a local bar. When he asked Bayer whether she thought Clinton’s goal is to ban all guns, she responded “For sure … you have to take that sort of moderate [language] ‘We just wanna have common sense legislation so our children are safe. You say s*** like that and then people will buy into it.”

She added: “Saying you want to ban guns altogether, that’s going to p*** everybody off.”

A couple of minutes later into the video O’Keefe records Bayer’s response when she learns, by seeing a poster of herself copied from the undercover conversation with the PVA agent, that she has been exposed as a “useful idiot” in the campaign against guns. She grabs the poster, is confronted by police, denies her conversation, and becomes incoherent.

Assuming that as a Clinton delegate Bayer is knowledgable about the tactics of higher-level Democrats, there’s much to be learned from this 57-second exposure of real intentions and Bayer’s participation as a useful idiot. The key point is learning how closely Clinton’s anti-gun campaign hews to Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. First, Alinsky taught that true revolutionaries do not publicly flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, they put on suits and speak in soothing terms designed to hide their real intentions. But they never veer from their true purpose:

A Marxist begins with this prime truth: all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists … [that it must be changed] into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat [leading to] the political paradise of communism.

In that quest, the end justifies the means, according to Alinsky (and his disciple Hillary Clinton):

The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….

The tenth rule … is you do what you can with what you have and clothe if with moral garments.

Hillary is a great admirer of Alinsky, meeting with him in person several times while doing her senior thesis on his theories while at Wellesley College. Alinsky is following the rules of his master, to whom he dedicated his efforts:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history … the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

A graduate of an Ivy League school and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached

gun right-to-conceal-carry

gun danger hillary

obama gun immigrant background

gun rnc

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO Socialism Makes People Selfish

Jul 18, 2016

Which is better: socialism or capitalism? Does one make people kinder and more caring, while the other makes people greedy and more selfish? In this video, Dennis Prager explains the moral differences between socialism and capitalism, and why anyone who wants a kind and generous society must support one and oppose the other.

socialism zero


socialism by gun

hillary socialist

Communism plan

people v government

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

VIDEO The Four Steps for American Subversion

A warning from a former KGB agent

The Four Steps for American Subversion

April 25, 2012 By Tim Bryce



The premise behind Hitchcock’s 1935 movie classic, “The 39 Steps,” was not about a staircase, but rather a series of clandestine tasks to ultimately overthrow the government. It was an intriguing movie but as it turns out, it actually takes considerably fewer steps to subvert a government, four to be exact, at least according to Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB agent. Throughout the 1960s, Bezmenov served the KGB primarily in India where he spread Soviet propaganda and disinformation to the Western world. He eventually defected to the West in 1970 and settled in Canada where he lectured and wrote about the KGB’s techniques for subverting the West.

In 1985 he was featured in a television interview which is still available on YouTube. During the interview, Bezmenov explains the KGB’s activities are less about espionage in the classic James Bond sense (only 15 percent), and more concerned with “Ideological Subversion” (85 percent) which is used to secretly undermine the American government through psychological warfare. Key to this program is to change the perception of reality using subliminal brainwashing techniques over an extended period of time. As I’ve written in the past, people act on their perceptions of reality, regardless if it is correct or fallacious. They are not so much concerned with facts as they are in perspectives and self interests. By controlling the perceptions of people, they become more prone to make erroneous conclusions thereby simplifying the manipulation of the masses. The objective of the KGB program, therefore, is to program people into dismissing true facts as fallacious even in spite of the obvious.

As Bezmenov explains in the interview, there are four steps to transform the thinking and behavior of the population:

1. Demoralization – this is a process which can take about 15-30 years to perform (a generation). During this stage, the moral fibre and integrity of the country is put into question, thereby creating doubt in the minds of the people. To do so, manipulation of the media and academia is required to influence young people. As the younger generation embraces new values, such as Marxism and Leninism, the older generation slowly loses control simply through attrition. Again, true facts no longer matter during this stage, but rather creating perceptions are of paramount importance.

2. Destabilization – the purpose of this step is to change the status quo, particularly the country’s economy, foreign relations, and defense systems. The intent is to create a massive government permeating society and becoming intrusive in the lives of its citizens. This can take from two to five years to perform, again with the active support of academia pushing youth in this direction. Here, entitlements and benefits are promised to the populace to encourage their support. Basically, they are bribing the people to accept their programs.

Bezmenov claims after this stage is completed, the naive college professors are no longer needed and since they will undoubtedly protest government policies when they discover the truth, they will be disposed of quickly. He cites examples of this occurring in Nicaragua, Grenada, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh.

3. Crisis – this is a major step lasting up to six weeks and involves a revolutionary change of power. This is where a cataclysmic event upsets and divides the country thereby creating panic among the citizens. Recent examples include the 2011 upheavals in the Middle East, most notably Egypt and Libya. To Americans, symptoms would include circumventing the Constitution and altering the checks and balances of government, and possibly martial law.

4. Normalization – the final stage is where the populace finally acquiesces and begins to assimilate communism. This can take up to two decades to complete.

Bezmenov claimed the first step, Demoralization, was completed well before his 1985 interview. In fact, the Russians were surprised how easily it had been performed. One clear indicator of the moral decay of the country is the decline of organized religion which, historically, has been a beacon for morality, but now it is in retreat. He also thought step two was nearing completion in 1985 but I believe he underestimated the rise and popularity of Ronald Reagan as president, which led to the end of the Cold War with the Soviet Union in 1991, and the shift to the War on Terror following 9/11. Nonetheless, many would argue America is now realizing Bezmenov’s scenario in 2012, particularly as the November elections loom ahead. This means the third step is in the offing which has a lot of people frightened for America’s future.

Yuri Bezmenov died in 1993 never realizing his prophecy, and hopefully it will never come to fruition, that we will remain a free and democratic Republic bound to the U.S. Constitution. However, as Bezmenov reminds us, communism requires simple patience and perseverance to alter the perceptions of the people. The only way to thwart it is to practice due diligence and not let it go unchallenged.

“America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.”
– Joseph Stalin

“The press is our chief ideological weapon.”
– Nikita Khrushchev

Keep the Faith!

How To Brainwash A Nation


Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Copyright © 2012 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.–the-four-steps-for-american-subversion-5985fc5a

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments