-MB Obama Claims ‘Borders Mean Something,’ Illegal Immigrants Shouldn’t Get Rewarded
-SEIU CA Rallies Push Legal Status for Remaining Illegal Aliens, Applaud Obama
-Help The Poor. Block the Amnesty
-Obama’s Executive Action Will Finish Off America
-Rand Paul Blasts Obama Executive Actions, Cites Internment Camps
-Congressman: Obama Has “Gone Rogue”
Obama has just raped the nation in every way. This cannot stand. We didn’t invite his illegal assault just because we were running on the beach.
Here is just part of the ‘right on’ response from Trey Gowdy in response to Obama’s Executive Amnesty.
….”Whether previous administrations acted outside of constitutional boundaries is not license to do the same. The President himself recognized his inability to do what he just did – 22 separate times. This action is not only detrimental to any chance in the new Congress for a sustainable, long-term solution on immigration, but also to the bedrock of our system of government – respect for the rule of law.”
“When the executive branch acts outside of constitutional boundaries the legislative branch must use all powers afforded it to respond and restore the constitutional equilibrium. This is not a Republican or Democrat issue. Rather, it should hasten the resolve of all Americans to make certain her elected officials honor the foundational document they swore to protect and defend.”
22 November, 2014 by Julio Severo
Obama announced yesterday, November 20, 2014, a major amnesty benefiting millions of illegal immigrants.
Obama is not doing it for kindness. It is similar to “bolsa-família,” a populist family-fund program from the Brazilian government that provides cash to millions of Brazilians. In fact, the government of President Barack Obama thinks that this Brazilian program is very important.
Many of those benefited by Obama’s amnesty are also Brazilians, who are fleeing from the leftist hell in Brazil, but by being aided by Obama, they are also aiding to produce the leftist hell in the U.S.
The handout (family fund) of President Dima Rousseff is bad, but is the handout (amnesty) of President Barack Obama good? After all, what is this story?
Well, Brazilian evangelical and Catholic conservatives who are in the U.S. are celebrating Obama’s immigration amnesty. Some of these Brazilians are my friends and I am seeing their celebration.
Yet, American evangelical and Catholic conservatives are not celebrating, because they know that this massive handout is Obama’s strategy to solidify the socialist hell in the U.S. Some of these Americans are my friends and I am seeing their sadness.
In this situation, what side would you choose? Would you celebrate with Brazilian evangelical and catholic conservatives who need the immigration amnesty?
Or would you cry with American evangelical and catholic conservatives?
What side would you choose?
What I find most troubling is the Brazilian attitude. They condemn Rousseff’s family fund as a strategy to solidify her socialist power, but they are eager to get Obama’s immigration amnesty, whose strategy is solidify the socialist power in the U.S.
Immigrants granted amnesty today will be the future voters for Obama’s Democratic Party, which is similar to the ruling Workers’ Party of Rousseff in regard to anti-life and anti-family policies.
Even though most of the immigrants, including Brazilians, are against abortion and gay “marriage,” they have relatives who also need the generous immigration amnesty of the Democratic Party, regardless if this party is pro-abortion and pro-sodomy.
What is most important in this situation?
Money and prosperity. When people want them, they do not care about the means to get them.
I watched on YouTube a prank of a handsome young man in a very expensive car. He drove through several streets and offered — just by signaling with his hands, with no word — a lift to several beautiful young women who were walking on the sidewalk. Even though they were suspicious about him and objected that they did not know him, all of them accepted the ride.
Money, prosperity and comfort draw people.
Obama is offering a ride with the car that past generations of Americans worked hard to get.
Brazilian conservatives do not care about the motivations of him who is offering the ride. They want to ride and be a part of the money, prosperity and comfort.
The socialist side that has this power is going to get the support even from Brazilian conservatives. It is what is happening between them and Obama. They say that they are fleeing Rousseff’s handouts, but run for Obama’s handouts and even ask help from Obama, expecting him to deliver them from socialist Rousseff.
What do not money, prosperity and comfort do to people? They forget that they are conservative. But socialists — whether Obama or Rousseff — do not forget what they are.
Family funds, immigration amnesties and other “rides” are part of the socialist revolution sweeping Brazil and the U.S.
Conservatives should stop using clever and even illegal ways to enter the U.S.
Some years ago I was in a prayer meeting in Brazil and the Presbyterian minister asked prayer for a young couple, who was about to travel to the U.S. It was not just a trip. It was a move.
They had all the papers necessary for the trip. They had paid a very large sum to an American group to get fake papers.
They had a very successful trip. Later, they were granted amnesty. Now, they are “American.” Now, they have money, prosperity and comfort.
Did God hear their prayer?
Is God hearing Obama’s socialist “prayers”?
MB Obama Claims ‘Borders Mean Something,’ Illegal Immigrants Shouldn’t Get Rewarded
21 Nov 2014 by Tony Lee
On Friday, at the Las Vegas, Nevada high school where then-candidate Barack Obama pivoted to his “Si, Se Puede” (Yes, we can) message in 2008, President Barack Obama celebrated his executive amnesty in which he essentially declared, “Yes, I can.”
After announcing his executive amnesty at the White House on Thursday evening that will give temporary amnesty and work permits to millions of illegal immigrants, Obama went to Del Sol High School in Nevada and became the salesman-in-chief. Obama will reportedly try to “aggressively” sell his executive amnesty in the coming weeks across the country, including next Tuesday in Chicago with Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) and Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
He sold his executive overreach by claiming that his executive amnesty was not “amnesty” but actually “accountability” for illegal immigrants.
“It’s not amnesty,” Obama claimed. “What we are offering is accountability.”
Obama also said that illegal immigrants “shouldn’t get rewarded for cutting in line” and conceded that “undocumented workers broke our immigration laws.” He even conceded that “some are dangerous” criminals.
Obama said that since illegal immigrants who qualify for his executive amnesty will have to register with the federal government, pass a background check, pay their fair share of taxes, they will be held “accountable” even though Obama is rewarding them for breaking the country’s immigration laws and treating them differently under the rule of law. All that was still not enough for a heckler who felt Obama did not go big enough on his executive amnesty.
Obama also said America was exceptional not because of its rule of law but because “we welcome” illegal immigrant DREAMers. Obama said he believes in “fairness” and mentioned that the “immigration system feels fundamentally unfair” even though Obama’s executive amnesty rewarded illegal immigrants at the expense of legal immigrants who have been waiting in line for years or decades to come lawfully to the United States.
Obama then declared that he thought “borders mean something” and he believed in “secure borders.” Obama’s own immigration enforcement officials, though, have sued the administration for preventing them from deporting illegal immigrants who are not some of the most violent and dangerous criminals. Obama’s former ICE director, John Sandweg told the Los Angeles Times earlier this year that, “if you are a run-of-the mill immigrant living here illegally, your odds of getting deported are close to zero.” According to the Department of Homeland Security’s own data, “only 0.08% of the nation’s 12 million illegal immigrants were removed from the interior in 2013 who were not convicted criminals or fugitives.” On Friday, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) said that, “if you get past the border, you’re home free under Obama’s orders.”
Obama again said he would not give up on comprehensive amnesty legislation and called for Congress to pass a bill that gives illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship and would reward high-tech companies with more high-tech guest-worker visas even though America has a surplus of high-tech workers.
This was Obama’s third trip to Del Sol High School—and each trip has been significant. Obama’s first trip was after his 2008 primary loss to Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire after Obama won in Iowa. Though Obama lost New Hampshire, his “Yes we can” concession speech may have won him the primary and the general election. “Yes we can” translates to “Si se puede” in Spanish, which Cesar Chavez made famous. And when Obama first visited Del Sol High School in 2008, he road-tested his new stump speech. In 2008 before the Nevada caucuses, Obama said that “change for me is not just rhetoric… It’s been the cause of my life.” And he then declared, “Si, se puede!” Obama’s second trip to the high school was in January of 2013 when he announced his comprehensive amnesty plan that he wanted Congress to pass.
SEIU celebratory rallies held across California continued throughout Friday taking names of those who don’t qualify under President Obama’s new and expanded legal status for millions of illegal aliens while heralding his iron fisted legal status declaration.
SEIU California announced 12 rallies throughout California, saying, “Community members who have fought for comprehensive immigration reform will join affected families, local elected officials, and legal experts for a news conference following today’s announcement that President Obama will take administrative action to move comprehensive immigration reform forward.”
One SEIU rally involved taking signatures from any who said they would not be included under the new and expanded executive order, presumptively remaining illegally present in the U.S.. A photo and description was posted to the SEIU California Twitter account reading, “Names of friends and family who won’t benefit from ?#ImmigrationAction – but the Presidents 1st action helps millions.”
The powerful union also unveiled new website iAmerica.org. “iAmerica is for American immigrant families of all walks of life, providing tools and support to get informed, inspire change and impact America’s future,” reads the front page of the site. The site devotes a section to registering voters. Another section called, Make an Impact lists one of five actions as “Take another selfie” and “amplify the call for immigration reform.”
Watch parties and press conference scheduled around the country are also posted on iAmerica. The site even boasts a section on finding legal services throughout the country, pulling from a database in a joint project of the Immigration Advocates Network and Pro Bono Net. Television network Univision, RocktheVote, National Immigration Law Center and MiFamilia Vota Education Fund are just a few of the organization that have joined with SEIU in sponsoring iAmerica according to the website.
Follow Michelle Moons on Twitter @MichelleDiana
Help The Poor. Block the Amnesty
Marx As An Adviser On How Best To Screw The Poor.
November 22nd, 2014 By: Repair_Man_Jack (Diary)
He Works For Nobody Else In America
There are people out there who genuinely appreciate all that President Obama has done since he found the American crown adrift in the gutter back in 2008. The TaxProf blog explains who these fortunate individuals are below.
12,040 new ultra high net worth (UHNW) individuals were minted this year, pushing the global UHNW population to a record 211,275, a 6% increase from 2013. The combined wealth of the world’s UHNW individuals – defined as those with US$30 million and above in net assets – increased by 7% to US$29.725 trillion in 2014, almost twice the GDP of the world’s largest economy, the United States.
It was in the interest of all of his newly-minted billionaire buddies that the president chose to act decisively on immigration and legalize 5 million individuals who came to the United States illegally. The President explains his latest act of corporate welfare below.
Administration officials estimate approximately 5 million people could apply for temporary protected status that would require a background check and hefty application fees. Those eligible could legally work in the United States for up to three years. Because Obama’s administrative changes can be erased by the next president, advocates believe many who are eligible will think long and hard before stepping forward. Lifting some existing DACA restrictions will make 270,000 more people eligible for enforcement discretion under Obama’s waivers. Including undocumented parents of children who are U.S. citizens or legal residents opens the door to another 4 million people, according to the administration.
Barack Obama’s editorial Cheerleader Paul Krugman, makes an argument that we should appreciate this as a humane initiative. He explains that we are doing for the children.
First, there are more than a million young people in this country who came — yes, illegally — as children and have lived here ever since. Second, there are large numbers of children who were born here — which makes them U.S. citizens, with all the same rights you and I have — but whose parents came illegally, and are legally subject to being deported. What should we do about these people and their families? There are some forces in our political life who want us to bring out the iron fist — to seek out and deport young residents who weren’t born here but have never known another home, to seek out and deport the undocumented parents of American children and force those children either to go into exile or to fend for themselves.
Yes Dr. Krugman, suffer the children; but just whose children do we make suffer? We are bringing 5 million new people into a labor force that has the lowest civilian participation rate that we’ve had in nearly 4 decades. We are opening the country to more people, in complete violation of our laws; when there simply is not gainful economic employment available for the people we already have. Glenn Reynolds links to the following data from the WSJ.
The official U.S. unemployment rate has indeed fallen steadily during the past few years, but the economic recovery has created the fewest jobs relative to the previous employment peak of any prior recovery. The labor-force participation rate recently touched a 36-year low of 62.7%. The number of Americans not in the labor force set a record high of 92.6 million in September. Part-time work and long-term unemployment are still well above levels from before the financial crisis. Worse, middle-class incomes continue to fall during the recovery, losing even more ground than during the December 2007 to June 2009 recession. The number in poverty has also continued to soar, to about 50 million Americans. That is the highest level in the more than 50 years that the U.S. Census has been tracking poverty. Income inequality has risen more in the past few years than at any recent time.
To understand who exactly benefits from this policy, we need to keep in mind who benefits from the influx low-skill, low wage labor into the current US economy. An economist that both Paul Krugman and President Obama undoubtedly have great admiration for explained the following :
“Relative surplus-population is therefore the pivot upon which the law of demand and supply of labour works.” The availability of labour influences wage rates, and the larger the unemployed workforce grows, the more this forces down wage rates; conversely, if there are plenty jobs available and unemployment is low, this tends to raise the average level of wages—in that case workers are able to change jobs rapidly to get better pay. – Karl Marx, “Wages,” December 1847
So who really gets served by this amnesty being proposed by President Obama? Who really has been served by the entire Goldbama Sachs Presidency? We know whose assets have increased since The Goldman One took office. We know what has happened to the rest of the workforce. In any good piece of detective fiction, the inspector has to ask himself “Qui Bono?” It’s always being run for the 1%. The ones that Barack Obama has helped occupy Wall Street.
In forcing this executive amnesty down the throats of the American People; our president has indeed been a good, little Ivy League radical and read his Karl Marx. It’s just that he uses it as a playbook on how to enrich his billionaire donors rather than a critique on the abuses of unconstrained capital. It’s always the Working Class American who pays in freedom, blood and treasure any time a Liberal “Man of The People” occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Obama’s Executive Action Will Finish Off America
Economic consequences of unilateral amnesty will be a death blow
November 22, 2014 by Kurt Nimmo
Obama’s unconstitutional executive action “to shield millions of undocumented immigrants,” as The New York Times puts it, is a brazen effort to further impoverish the American middle class and convert the country into a third world wasteland.
This reality is ignored by the corporate media as it celebrates Obama’s “landmark” betrayal of the Constitution.
The establishment media fails to point out the obvious: the federal government has merged a huge underclass into the system, specifically the tax system.
Details were spelled out by Neil Munro of The Daily Caller on Thursday. He noted that the legalization of illegals will impose further financial obligations on American taxpayers.
“Illegal immigrants will receive huge payments from American taxpayers under rules now being imposed by President Barack Obama’s unilateral amnesty,” Munro writes.
He points out statements by Cecilia Munoz, a former immigration lobbyist who is now a top Obama aide. Munoz admitted millions of impoverished and near impoverished Mexican immigrants will become part of the tax system.
Munro cites a study showing that 47 percent of legal and illegal immigrants and their children are classified as living in poverty or in near-poverty.
Once these immigrants are enrolled in the tax system, Munro notes, they will be entitled to Earned Income Tax Credit payments. “A family with two kids, and an income of $20,000, would receive $14,590 in taxpayer funds this year alone,” he writes.
This huge transfer of wealth from productive Americans to a parasitical class of poverty-stricken immigrants will hasten the economic demise of the nation.
Prior to the legalization of illegal immigrants, 49% of Americans received some sort of transfer payment from the government: Social Security, food stamps, the Women, Infants and Children program, unemployment, subsidized housing, railroad retirement, veterans’ benefits, etc.
Obamacare is further exacerbating the situation. “This law is going to financially cripple millions of American families. It truly is a death panel for the U.S. economy,” writes Michael Snyder.
Add to this the $29 trillion given to “too big to fail” banks, and you have a situation that will soon result in economic collapse.
The situation is not happenstance or due to government bungling and ineptitude. It is part of a carefully orchestrated plan to loot the remaining wealth of the country and destroy the middle class.
Obama’s unconstitutional executive action will import Mexico’s political and economic system into the United States — a tiny financial elite lording over millions of desperately poor campesinos.
Rand Paul Blasts Obama Executive Actions, Cites Internment Camps
Obama Announces Immigration Plan – Charles Krauthammer -O’Reilly
Congressman: Obama Has “Gone Rogue”