Richard Wurmbrand Would Not Stay Silent for His Faith in Jesus Christ To Communists – Criminalization of Christianity is here

The criminalization of Christianity is here
October 25, 2014 by Samuel Judah

Today, we are going to talk about a man named Richard Wurmbrand who stood up for God against Communists. Richard had a wife named Sabina and a son named Mihai who were with him in the fight. This story takes place in a country called Romania, which was being overthrown by communists. These communists we’re trying to make themselves the government to be able to control the people. They would tell them what they had to do and how to do it or else!

When Richard and his wife were leaving their house one day, they went to a church where the communists were telling people that God doesn’t exist and that they could not worship God. They wanted support from the people and pastors on this idea. Some of the people that Richard knew were there, but they said nothing.

However, even though Richard had a family to think about, he loved Jesus so much that he was not going to stand by and let this happen. Therefore, he walked up to the pulpit to take a stand for Christ and said in a loud voice,

“…How can we respect a government that denies the existence of God, denies us the reading of the Bible and shuts down the places in which we meet to worship? …Shame on the cowardice that does not stand and defend our God! Such a government deserves not our support…”

He went on to say that, “It is for God that this church was built, it is for God!”
After this happened, the communists started spying on Richard and his home! In fact, one day while Richard was walking to church, he noticed a car following him and the people inside the car were watching him. When this happened he tried to run away, but the men in the car caught him and kidnapped him. When they threw him in the car, Richard asked, “Where are you taking me?” They hit him with a gun, he blacked out and they imprisoned him.

When he got to the prison, they put him in a cell. During this time, Richard was horribly tortured for simply taking a stand for Christ. Also, during this time, his wife was captured and forced to help build a canal for the communists. Mihai, Richard’s son, was given the red scarf of a communist student and told to wear it. However, when the teacher gave it to him, he threw it to the ground and said, “No! I will not wear your red scarf! The communists put my parents in prison because they believe in God! I am proud to be a Christian and I am proud of my parents!” When the teacher heard this, she kicked him out of school.

Mihai ended up alone and homeless for 3 years from the age of 9-12 while his parents were in the hands of the communists.

Sabina was told by the Romanian authorities that Richard had died in prison, but he never did. When Sabina was released, she was finally reunited with her son. However, both Sabina and Mihai were living without their husband and father during this time.

After 8 ½ years in prison, Richard was released and came home.

I can only imagine how happy his wife and son were! Richard was told not to preach again, but as a faithful servant of God, he kept preaching and did not deny his God. As a result, he went back to prison for 5 years and was eventually released once again after increased political pressure from western countries came upon the communists to let him go.

Richard Wurmbrand spent a total of nearly 13 years being tortured in prison because he stood for Christ.

Sometime after being freed, Richard started the Voice of the Martyrs ministry.

Richard was a great example of a courageous and faithful man of God who took a stand for Christ! How the world would be different if we had more men like him!

Samuel Judah is the son of Bradlee Dean and is 10 years old. He is one of the producers of The Sons of Liberty Radio and is an excellent student as well! Sam is also featured on the My War documentary series for reciting the Bill of Rights when he was only 5 years old! Sam loves to read, meet new people, and is big help in The Sons of Liberty Ministry.

The criminalization of Christianity is here
Joseph Farah calls Americans to speak up, rise up against persecution in U.S.
Oct 26, 2014 by Joseph Farah

Kahnh Huynh knows something about living in a society devoid of freedom of religion, speech and association.

He was one of millions in Communist Vietnam who fled the police state in rickety boats, got sent to re-education prison camps for the Christian faith or political views or was killed for opposing totalitarianism.

In Kahnh’s case, he risked his life for a chance he and his children could live free in America.

“We could not express our freedom of religion and belief,” he told WND. “We paid … to come to our country (the U.S.), that recognizes human rights of speech and religion.”

Today, Kahnh is a U.S. citizen and Christian pastor whose sermons and communications about homosexuality are being subpoenaed by the lesbian mayor of Houston under the city’s “non-discrimination” law Mayor Annise Parker says was all about her.

As WND first reported, the measure, among other things, creates a special class of citizens for “gender-confused” people to use public restrooms designated for the opposite sex.

Parker is using the ordinance to intimidate those who oppose the law and specifically pastors who gathered signatures to repeal it.

They said it couldn’t happen here.

But it is clearly happening today.

In the only nation founded upon a Christian creed, a country established “to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind,” governments are openly, unabashedly and unashamedly harassing citizens teaching and espousing their Christian faith.

In a land founded on the principle of these “self-evident” truths – “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” that being the very purpose of the institution of government, elected and appointed officials are intimidating and, yes, persecuting those simply practicing their spiritual beliefs and convictions in the course of their lives.

It’s not just happening in Houston.

A week earlier, WND exposed the nationwide pattern of dozens of government attacks on Christian bakers, photographers, caterers and others who, as a matter of religious conviction, declined to participate in same-sex wedding ceremonies and celebrations.

The criminalization of Christianity in “the land of the free” is here.

While the egregious Houston case is getting nationwide attention among religious freedom activists, the Big Media, which operate under the same First Amendment protections established guard the free exercise of religion, remain virtually silent on the new wave of persecution and harassment.

Even more disturbing is the reaction of the institutional church, which is behaving more like the kind of state-approved bodies so familiar in totalitarian regimes in China, Vietnam and Cuba today and Adolf Hitler’s Germany in another era.

This is how it begins.

Remember what pastor Martin Niemöller said about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis’ rise to power?

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Socialist.

“Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist.

“Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew.

“Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”

It’s time to speak up.

It’s time to rise up.

It’s time to prevent history from repeating itself in a nation turning against the very principles and precepts upon which it is founded, including “a decent respect for the opinions of mankind.”

It’s time to say, “Never again.” And to mean it.

Media wishing to interview Joseph Farah, please contact

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ebola nurse states have no right to protect citizens by quarantine workers from West Africa – CDC Admits Lying

Ebola nurse states have no right to protect citizens by quarantine workers coming from West Africa
October 30, 2014 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) An American nurse who was placed under mandatory quarantine in her home state of Maine after traveling to West Africa to treat Ebola patients says she plans to break her quarantine on Thursday, believing it to be unconstitutional. The 33-year-old Kaci Hickox stated on Good Morning America that she will even take the matter to court, should state officials refuse to let her leave her house and live her life, despite failing to wait out the proper incubation period.

Hickox had been working with the France-based nonprofit Doctors Without Borders in Sierra Leone for five weeks and recently flew back to the U.S. via Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey. Upon landing, Hickox was immediately quarantined in a tent at University Hospital due to having a temperature of 101 degrees Fahrenheit, at which point she bemoaned the fact that she had to stay away from the general public in order to rule out a possible Ebola infection.

Hickox was then given a blood test, which came back negative for Ebola. But since the incubation period for Ebola can last up to 42 days, or even longer in some cases, this test is hardly an accurate indicator of her health status. Even so, Hickox believes that she should be able to freely mingle in society, potentially infecting countless others with a disease that may cause their insides to literally melt out of their bodies.

Hickox says she wasn’t properly cared for under quarantine; tent not even heated

Part of Hickox’s complaint alleges that the care which she received while under quarantine at University Hospital was subpar. Her tent, confirmed Doctors Without Borders to The Wall Street Journal, was not even heated. And her caretakers were wearing the exact same protective suits that she had worn in Sierra Leone while treating patients.

The hospital denies these claims, insisting that while inconvenient, the quarantine was made as comfortable as possible for Hickox. Even so, the woman was eventually transferred to her home state of Maine where she was also told by the state to remain under mandatory quarantine, but this time in her home. Outraged by this restriction, Hickox has since stated that she will not abide by the order.

“I don’t plan on sticking to the guidelines,” stated Hickox to TODAY’s Matt Lauer about her current quarantined status in Maine. “I remain appalled by these home quarantine policies that have been forced upon me, even though I am in perfectly good health and feeling strong and have been this entire time completely symptom free.”

Is a forced quarantine unconstitutional?

As the Ebola narrative continues to evolve, questions like those which Hickox is asking are becoming increasingly prevalent. Is it acceptable for government officials to impose mandatory quarantines in the interest of public health, or are such actions a violation of civil liberties? In Hickox’s view, her own personal freedom outweighs the possible threat to public health, and also violates the U.S. Constitution.

“I truly believe this policy is not scientifically nor constitutionally just, and so I’m not going to sit around and be bullied around by politicians and be forced to stay in my home when I am not a risk to the American public,” she added.

According to CNN, Hickox was asked by the state of Maine to remain in her home for at least 21 days since her last contact with an Ebola patient. In response, Maine officials say they are “exploring all of [their] options” for how to protect the public from a possible Ebola outbreak.

Learn all these details and more at the FREE online Pandemic Preparedness course at

CDC admits it has been lying all along about Ebola transmission; “indirect” spread now acknowledged
October 30, 2014 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) Defying its own quack advice that the agency has been propagandizing for months, the CDC has now released a document on Ebola that admits the virus can spread through aerosolized droplets. The document, quietly released on the CDC website, also admits Ebola can contaminate surfaces such as doorknobs, causing infections to be spread through indirect means. [1]

Here’s a backup source of the PDF just in case the CDC scrubs it:

In other words, the CDC is now admitting it lied all along and that Natural News was correct from day one when we warned you about indirect transmission routes of the Ebola virus. (The CDC has always insisted it could only spread via “direct contact.”)

“Ebola is spread through droplets,” the CDC document now reads. Mirroring exactly what I’ve been telling millions of people in my free audio course at the CDC now says “A person might also get infected by touching a surface or object that has germs on it and then touching their mouth or nose.”

Yeah, we know. In fact, everybody in the independent media has known this for months, while all those who watch mainstream media sources are just now realizing this because they’ve been repeatedly lied to by CDC and NIH spokespeople.

The CDC has offered no apology whatsoever for intentionally misleading the public up to this point. Apparently, lying to the public is such a common activity at the highest levels of the CDC that they don’t think there’s anything wrong with it.

CDC also admits Ebola can contaminate surfaces and spread through indirect contact
“Droplets can contaminate objects like doorknobs,” the CDC document goes on to admit. This also means that Ebola can contaminate all sorts of surfaces, including ATM keypads, subway car hand rails, airplane tray tables, taxicab door handles and much more.

This also means the CDC’s previous assertion that Ebola could only spread through “direct contact” is utterly false. It’s just one more reason to never trust anything the CDC tells you. (The CDC has already lost tremendous credibility in all this, and it’s going to lose even more before this is finished…)

Just this week, a stunning new scientific study found that Ebola can survive on contaminated surfaces for up to 50 days. This means an infected Ebola carrier like Dr. Spencer could have sneezed on a doorknob or other surface, causing viable Ebola droplets to be deposited there. Another person could have come along and touched the same doorknob, then infected themselves with Ebola by touching their own eyes, nose or mouth.

Dr. Spencer, we have now learned, lied to police and claimed he was “self quarantined” when in fact he was riding the subway and visiting restaurants and bowling alleys. As the NY Post reports: [3]

The city’s first Ebola patient initially lied to authorities about his travels around the city following his return from treating disease victims in Africa, law-enforcement sources said. Dr. Craig Spencer at first told officials that he isolated himself in his Harlem apartment — and didn’t admit he rode the subways, dined out and went bowling until cops looked at his MetroCard the sources said.

CDC still lying about how far a sneeze spreads

The art of lying is so instilled in the culture of the CDC that even when it reveals one stunning truth, it feels compelled to spread another lie at the same time.

In this document that admits Ebola can be spread via aerosolized droplets, the CDC falsely insists those droplets can only travel a maximum distance of 3 feet:

But a recent MIT study published in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics found that coughs could propel droplets up to 20 feet. [4]

“When you cough or sneeze, you see the droplets, or feel them if someone sneezes on you,” said John Bush, a professor of applied mathematics at MIT and co-author of the study. “But you don’t see the cloud, the invisible gas phase. The influence of this gas cloud is to extend the range of the individual droplets, particularly the small ones.”

So now, even though the CDC has finally admitted Ebola can spread through the air, it is falsely claiming the maximum distance it can spread is only 3 feet.

By the way, the alternative media — sources like and — have been reporting the truth about the aerosolized spread of Ebola for months.

In fact, originally got this completely wrong, reporting in August that “aerosol transmission is not possible” but then finally coming around once I corrected them about viral transmission via aerosolized particles in this article.

The mainstream media, as always, has dutifully repeated the lies of the CDC all along, parroting whatever medical quackery and anti-science nonsense Thomas Frieden and Anthony Fauci are pushing at the moment. What’s especially hilarious in all this is how Frieden and Fauci, who are positioned by the lamestream media as the most authoritative and credible representatives of modern epidemiological science, have been caught lying over and over again about Ebola’s transmission vectors. The loss of credibility the CDC has already experienced over Ebola is just staggering. Nobody believes anything the CDC says anymore, and rightly so.

If you want to learn the truth about Ebola, pandemic preparedness and medical isolation protocols, you have to get that information from independent sources such as

The following infographic I created here at Natural News reveals just some of the quackery and fuzzy math pushed by the CDC over the last few months:



Related previous posts on this blog

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VIDEO Race-Baiting Desperate Dems’ Using Intimidation to Get Out the Vote – Teamster Members Attack Union ‘Fatcats’ – Burke was FIRED

-Teamster Members Attack Union ‘Fatcats’ and ‘Parasites’ For Misuse of Funds, Lies & More
-Former Trek President Also Says Mary Burke Fired by Her Family
-Undercover Video Shows North Carolina Campaign Staffers Encouraging Non-Citizen to Vote for Hagan
-Warrant Issued After Democrat Senator’s Husband Caught Stealing Republican Campaign Signs on Video
desperate dems vote
The Democrats’ Desperate, Race-Baiting Push
October 30th, 2014 By: Leon H. Wolf (Diary)

As several key Senate races head down to the wire, many embattled Democrats have, in desperation, resorted to their most reliable, tried and true tactic: race baiting. None has done so more gratuitously or offensively than the pasty white creature of privilege Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC)4% who has distributed flyers suggesting that if Thom Tillis won, blacks would be lynched and more recently suggested that Thom Tillis killed Trayvon Martin. In response to these gratuitous and offensive tactics, Thom Tillis objected publicly to the race-baiting of Hagan’s campaign; for doing so he was subjected to a National Journal story which ran an incredible headline suggesting that “both sides” were injecting race into the NC Senate campaign.

Just to review the bidding – one side (Hagan) ran two racially charged ads, the other side (Tillis) complained that the ads were racially charged, and the media reports this as “both sides injecting race” into a campaign. What despicable and ridiculous arbiters of truth we have in this country.

The New York Times(!), at least, has recognized the blatantly obvious – that embattled Democrats this election cycle are responsible for playing the race card to the hilt this election season:

In the final days before the election, Democrats in the closest Senate races across the South are turning to racially charged messages — invokingTrayvon Martin’s death, the unrest in Ferguson, Mo., and Jim Crow-era segregation — to jolt African-Americans into voting and stop a Republican takeover in Washington.

The images and words they are using are striking for how overtly they play on fears of intimidation and repression. And their source is surprising. The effort is being led by national Democrats and their state party organizations — not, in most instances, by the shadowy and often untraceable political action committees that typically employ such provocative messages.

I have given the Republicans a lot of grief over the last couple of weeks for running on a mostly idea-free platform this election season. But it’s important to remember that however little the Republicans have to offer America, the Democrats are offering much, much worse. They have demonstrated time and time again that they are willing to actively sow seeds of discord, discontentment and unrest in America if it helps them keep their seats of power. They care nothing for America or for the health of American society.

They have no interest in healing race relationships and in fact are actively working against it because it furthers their electoral prospects.

Such people must not be allowed to keep power, whatever the alternative.

Democrat Leaders in West Virginia Getting More Desperate before Election Day
October 30th, 2014 By: unsilentmajority (Diary)

We are less than seven days out from Republicans in West Virginia taking a U.S. Senate seat, all three seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, as well as taking over the state House of Delegates.

Now that we are in the final stretch, Democrat Party leaders in West Virginia are turning to intimidation to get out the vote.

On person on Twitter received the following letter signed by state Democrat Party Chairman Larry Puccio:

“Our records indicate that you are eligible to vote in 2014.

The West Virginia Democratic Party monitors the level of voting in your neighborhood. The Kanawha County Clerk’s Office official voting records are public information, and show whether you cast a ballot, but not [who] you voted for. We will be reviewing these records after the election to determine whether you joined other citizens who voted in 2014…

…Please don’t disappoint us.”

Dem race baiter letter

Needless to say, this letter creeped out this woman, who took to Twitter to vent.

Of course, the Democrat candidates has often used intimidation to get people to the polls in the state’s history, particularly during primaries. This is not a tactic that can work anymore, and now people can go to social media with the proof.

This also isn’t the first time that Democrats have tried to use their voter rolls in an unethical way. The state Ethics Commission smacked House Democrats for using voter mailing lists compiled by the state Democrat Party to send official House of Delegates letters to likely voters prior to the May primary. Even Secretary of State Natalie Tennant’s office looks like it’s operating in a partisan way. the state Supreme Court scolded Tennant for trying to leave off the ballot a Republican candidate for House of Delegates. Her office has been lax in making Democrat-supporting third party groups, like the the AFL-CIO’s “Honest West Virginians,” file their financial reports on time (Honest West Virginians finally filed their reports two days after I wrote about it, but still weeks after they made large radio and TV ad buys, in clear violation). She can’t even follow her own polling place rules, leading a rally to the doors of a voter registration office.

The numbers don’t look good for Democrats. Republicans just need four seats to sweep the House of Delegates for the first time in 83 years, with as many as 10 seats in play. The state Senate could see as many as seven Republicans elected, putting that body at a 17-17 tie. And U.S. Senator Joe Manchin could easily find himself the senior congressional Democrat. Democrat leaders have lost the confidence of the electorate and can’t get it back any other way than by threatening registered Democrats.

With friends like Democrats, who needs enemies?

Teamster Members Attack Union ‘Fatcats’ and ‘Parasites’ For Misuse of Funds, Lies & More
October 30th, 2014 By: LaborUnionReport (Diary)

Members of a New York-based Teamsters local blasted their union leadership for raising their own salaries, in addition to misusing union funds, threats and lies, according to fliers handed out at union-represented worksites in the New York area earlier this week.

Teamsters local 812, based in Great Neck, New York—a suburb of New York City—represents primarily soft drink and brewery workers.

Last year, according to financial records on file with the U.S. Department of Labor, the union claimed 3,504 members and the average Local 812 union members paid over $1,060 in dues, fees, or assessments according to the DOL records.

Since New York is not a Right-to-Work state, the union was able to require payment from the workers or have them terminated from their jobs if they refused.

With their pension fund is in critical status, as is required by law, the union sent out a notice to all affected members last year stating, “that by the 2018 Plan Year, contributions are not expected to be high enough to meet government standards for funding promised benefits plus those benefits that participants are currently earning.”

Given that their pensions may run out of money in a few short years and more than $1,000 coming out of their paychecks to fund the union, members facing an uncertain future appear disgruntled and disgusted at their union leaders for a variety of issues, including misusing union funds, raising their own salaries, lying to members, as well as threatening to a union shop steward at a Anheuser Bush facility in the Bronx.

So disgruntled, in fact, that several members were handing these fliers out at least one Local 812-represented worksite:

Former Trek President Also Says Mary Burke Fired by Her Family
To say it bluntly, she was fired’
October 30, 2014 BY: Stephen Gutowski

“To say it bluntly, she was fired,” former Trek president and COO Tom Albers told WISN.

His comments come on the heels of a report that detailed several former Trek employees’ claims that the current Democratic candidate for Wisconsin governor, Mary Burke, was fired by her own family after a catastrophic stint overseeing European operations.

“Her performance in Europe was not good,” Albers, who was vice president of the company at the time, told WISN. “We were losing a lot of money for us at the time. I don’t remember the amount, but it was considered significant based on where we were [as a company] at that particular point in time.”

“And also, we were encountering personnel/people problems over there. The people were threatening to leave the company. Many of them were.”

Albers said that Mary’s brother John was the first to raise the alarm over his sister’s poor performance. He said he was then sent to review Burke’s work and concluded her job was beyond saving.

“I pretty much came back with the same conclusions that John Burke had made; and that was that we had major people problems over there and were in a situation where we could lose a lot of people,” he told WISN. “We were losing a lot of money and I couldn’t see where Mary Burke was going to turn this thing around.”

Albers said there was some truth is Mary Burke’s claim that she was “burned out” by the job and that’s why her time there ended. However, he said that wasn’t the only issue.

“I think she probably did suffer burnout,” he said. “But at the same time she was underwater, too, and she couldn’t handle the position.”

When asked who made the final decision to fire Mary Burke, Albers was unequivocal.

“Ultimately, it was Dick Burke’s decision,” the former Trek president said. “He would have been the one who made the final decision.”

Undercover Video Shows North Carolina Campaign Staffers Encouraging Non-Citizen to Vote for Hagan
October 30, 2014

As the midterm elections approach, there is some concern about voter fraud having a significant impact on election results.

A video released by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas will only heighten those concerns. The video, released Thursday morning, shows a Veritas undercover investigator asking campaign staffers for a number of different candidates whether it would be illegal for her to vote, given that she is not a citizen of the United States. All of the staffers encourage her to vote anyway.

In a piece for National Review, John Fund said what goes on the video is “disturbing.”

He said at least one of the staffers in the video “appears to be afoul of a state law making it a felony ‘for any person, knowing that a person is not a citizen of the United States, to instruct or coerce that person to register to vote or to vote.’”

Warrant Issued After Democrat Senator’s Husband Caught Stealing Republican Campaign Signs on Video
“My husband is the man depicted in the video…”
October 30, 2014 by Mikael Thalen

Police issued an arrest warrant for the husband of Delaware State Sen. Bethany Hall-Long Wednesday after Republican volunteers captured him stealing political campaign signs on video.

Local members of the First State Liberty PAC and Republican Party, who posted video of the incident to Youtube, stated that repeated sign thefts in the city of Middletown prompted several members to begin monitoring the area after dark.

At around 4 a.m. Wednesday morning, only two hours after the group arrived, a man was seen collecting signs and attempting to load them into his vehicle. Caught in the act, the man, later identified as Dana Long, began justifying the theft by falsely claiming that the signs had “no names” on them.

“Property of the Republican Party!” one volunteer said, reading from the sign.

“We got you, brother! We got the license plate, your face, and everything,” another volunteer added.

After reporting the incident, the group was informed that the license plate and description of the suspect matched that of State Sen. Long’s husband.

Unable to locate the suspect, Middletown Police issued a warrant for Long’s arrest, charging him with Class A misdemeanor theft. If convicted, Long could face up to a year in prison and a fine of $2,300.

Although Long refused to speak due to the “advice of counsel,” Long’s wife issued a short statement following the video’s release.

My husband is the man depicted in the video. The video shows him removing a handful of signs this morning. He turned them over to the Democratic Party and asked that they be returned to the Republican Party about six hours after they were taken up. Sadly, this race has become tough and personal. My husband is my high school sweetheart and he loves me very much. I was not aware that he had allowed his frustration over the campaign attacks to get the better of him. Of course I’m disappointed and wish that it had not happened.

John Fluharty, the state’s GOP executive director, argued that the encounter merely reflected the Democratic Party’s continued corruption and failure.

“When you only have a track record of high taxes, unemployment and lower wages for private sector employees to stand on, the Democrats must resort to breaking the law to win elections because they are scared of being held accountable for their dismal performance,” Fluharty wrote.

Whether the incident will sway the upcoming election remains to be seen.

Libery USA roger-dean
racist liberal tfernandez

Related previous posts on this blog

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO CAIR list of American ‘Islamophobes’ – ‘hit list’ for Islamic State ‘lone wolves’? – Palestinian Gov’t Calls for War in Jerusalem

-Palestinian Government Calls for War in Jerusalem
-Dempsey Explains Why US Didn’t Stop Islamic State Massacre of Tribe That Fought Back
-ISIS Has More Land, Money, and Fighters Than Al-Qaeda Had on 9/11
October 29, 2014 By Dr. Rich Swier

There is a growing concern that converts to Islam in America and Canada are ready, ideologically willing and certainly able to conduct individual attacks against soldiers, police and innocent civilians. This week the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has called for increased security at some federal buildings. The Associated Press reports:

Security will be increased at various federal government buildings in Washington and other major American cities, the Homeland Security Department announced Tuesday in what it described as a “precautionary step.” The move came one week after a gunman in Ottawa fatally shot a soldier as he stood as a ceremonial guard at Ottawa’s National War Memorial, then stormed the Parliament building. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper called the shooting a terrorist attack.

As Mohammedans wage jihad against U.S. and Canadian citizens, in the name of Allah, the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has published a list of American individuals and organizations it considers to be “Islamophobic.” The new CAIR website is

The purpose of the CAIR website is, “[T]o monitor and challenge the growing anti-Muslim bigotry in American society. CAIR’s site presents detailed profiles of a number of individuals and institutions involved in the American Islamophobia network.” CAIR is characterize by some as a “moderate” Islamic organization. An anonymous quote on the internet states:

A radical Muslim wants to behead you. A moderate Muslim wants a radical Muslim to behead you.

On the list are Floridians Allen West, Guy Rogers, USF Professor Jonathan Matusitz, Dr. Rich Swier, Sam Kharoba and Tom Trento. The Islamic State has called for attacks against the United States targeting those who defame Mohammed. Are these men, women and organizations on the CAIR list designed to evoke the deadly passions of those who have joined the Islamic State in the U.S.?

Question: Will the Islamic State use the CAIR list of Islamophobes to attack these individuals?
Fight Back Islam ISIS
Those individuals and organizations listed by CAIR as Islamophobic include:


Ali Sina A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations, Sina believes, “there is NOTHING good in Islam and that it is all evil.”

Allen West A former Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Allen believes, ” Islam does not coexist.”

Anders Gravers A member of the president’s council of Stop Islamization of Nations who also heads Stop Islamization of Europe.

Ann Coulter A conservative commentator who suggested that “we should invade their [Muslim] countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”

Ashraf Rameleh A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. When speaking about the September 11th attacks he said “they are not terrorists, they are jihad. They are for the Quran.”

Babu Suseelani a member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. In 2012 Suseelan told an audience “If we do not kill the bacteria, the bacteria will kill us. Muslims will breed like rats and they will be a majority.”

Bill Maher Bill Maher hosts a political satire program, Real Time with Bill Maher, on HBO. Despite his claim to hold progressive opinions, Maher consistently demonizes and stigmatizes the Muslim community.

Brian Kilmeade A Fox News Channel commentator. In June 2013, Kilmeade told a leader of the English Defence League, an anti-Muslim group known for violent protests, “We got your back.”

Brigitte Gabriel The head of Act for America. Gabriel has said, “America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam.”

Bryan Fischer The director of issues analysis at the American Family Association. According to Fischer, “Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam.”

Carl Goldberg A member of the Arizona chapter of Act for America. According to an announcement for an October 2013 event, Goldberg can prove that “Islam is not just a religion but also a totalitarian and imperialistic ideology.”

Clare Lopez Lopez is the vice president for issues and analysis at the Center for Security Policy. She also a board member at the Clarion Project. In 2013, Lopez told an audience, “When people in other bona fide religions follow their doctrines they become better people — Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Jews. When Muslims follow their doctrine, they become jihadists.”

Cliff Kincaid A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. In 2013, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups in the United States, listed Kincad among the “30 new activists heading up the radical right.”

Constance Gavras The director of the Illinois chapter of Act for America.

Daniel Pipes The founder and director of the Middle East Forum. Pipes is also connected to the National Review, Clarion Project, and Washington Times. Pipes is the grandfather of Islamophobia in the United States. In 1990 he wrote, “Western European societies are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene…All immigrants bring exotic customs and attitudes, but Muslim customs are more troublesome than most.”

Dave Agema A former Michigan state legislator, Agema now represents his state as a national committeeman of the Republican National Committee. In early 2014, Agema made anti-Muslim comments on his Facebook account: “Have you ever seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the American way of life?

David Horowitz The founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that tracks hate in the United States, names Horowitz “the godfather of the modern anti-Muslim movement.”

David Yerushalmi A co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center and employee of the Center for Security Policy. Yerushalmi beleives, “Our greatest enemy today is Islam.”

Debbie Anderson The leader of the Minneapolis chapter of ACT for America.

Debbie Robinson A member of the president’s council of Stop Islamization of Nations. Robinson’s Q Society of Australia asserts, “Islam is not just another religion, but also a totalitarian ideology with a global agenda.”

Dorrie O’Brien O’Brien acts as a national mentor for ACT for America. According to O’Brien “Islam…is a poisoned well.”

Frank Gaffney The founder and president of the Center for Security Policy. Gaffney is also connected to the Washington Times, and Clarion Project. Gaffney has advocated renewing the House Un-American Activities Committee, a discredited McCarthy-era congressional committee that President Truman once described as “the most un-American thing in the country today.”

Glenn Beck Beck hosts the Glenn Beck show on the Blaze. In February, 2011, Beck hosted anti-Muslim speaker Joel Richardson on his Fox News program and the two “tied Islam to the Antichrist in the new testament.”

Guy Rodgers The executive director of ACT for America. In 2010, Rodgers “contended that Muslims should be treated differently because their legal system is inherently flawed.”

James Lafferty Originally known for his work with the Virginia Anti-Shariah Taskforce, Lafferty is now with both the American Freedom Defense Initiative and Jihad Watch.

State Rep. John Bennett of Oklahoma
(R-Sallisaw) According to Bennett, Islam is “a cancer in our nation that needs to be cut out.”

John Guandolo The founder of Understanding the Threat. Guandolo is a former FBI agent who trains law enforcement officers to believe in conspiracy theories such as his beleif that CIA Director Brennan is a secret Muslim.

Jonathan Matusitz The membership director for the central Florida chapter of Act for America and a professor at the University of Central Florida. Matusitz claims that Muslims “procreate like mushrooms after the rain” and that “the problem is Islam.”

Kamal Saleem A board member of Former Muslims United. In October 2012, Right Wing Watch posted a video of Saleem and noted that in that video, “Saleem alleged that Obama’s top speech writer and Sasha and Malia’s babysitter are both Islamic fundamentalists that are wielding secret power.”

Kevin Carroll A member of the president’s council of Stop Islamization of Nations.

Lauren Green An anchor on the Fox News Channel.

Mano Bakh A key individual with the California group Concerned American Citizens. On its website, the group asserts, “The real source of the devastating 9/11 attack is the Islamic Ideology as prescribed in Quran.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) A Minnesota Republican, Bachmann is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. In June 2012, Bachmann led a group of House Republicans on a series of five letters to federal inspectors alleging that the Muslim Brotherhood was infiltrating the U.S. government. The allegations primarily centered on an aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and were soundly rejected by Republican leadership.

Mike Huckabee A host on the Fox News Channel and former governor of Arkansas. Huckabee referred to Islam as the “antithesis of the gospel of Christ.” He also seemed to compare Muslim prayer being allowed in a church to the showing of pornographic films.

Nina Cunningham Cunningham serves on the boards of many anti-Islam organizations, including the Center for Security Policy, the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and also the Clarion Project.

Nonie Darwish A founder of Former Muslims United. Darwish asserts that “Islam should be fought and should be conquered and defeated and annihilated.”

Oskar Freysinger A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. He played a leading role in the movement to ban Islamic minarets in Switzerland.

Pamela Geller The cautic mouthpiece of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Geller believes, “Hitler was inspired by Islam.”She blogs atAtlas Shrugs and is a leader with the American Freedom Defense Initiative, Jihad Watch, and Stop the Islamization of Nations. Note: Geller also heads Stop Islamization of America, but this entity is identified as an AFDI project.

Rep. Peter King (R-.N.Y.) Peter King represents a district centered in New York’s, Long Island. He served as chairman of the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee from 2010-2012. King has maintained that “80%, 85% of the mosques in this country are controlled by Islamic fundamentalists,” and that average Muslims “are loyal,” but “don’t come forward, they don’t tell the police what they know”. Additionally in 2007, Representative King said, “Unfortunately, we have too many mosques in this country.”

Richard Swier Swier is the director of the Sarasota, Fla. chapter of ACT for America. (EDITORS NOTE: Dr. Rich Swier has not been the Director of the Sarasota ACT for America chapter for 8 years.)

Rick Joyner Joyner is the president of the Oak Initiative. He is also the founder/director of Morningstar Ministries and the founder/director of Heritage National Ministries. He has authored more than forty books. His book The Harvest lays out some of his views on Islam: “Islamic terrorists will permeate the West with teams that target Christian organizations and leaders. This is in preparation for an Islamic assault upon the entire world. They will compile computer data on every Christian leader who has any kind of extra-local influence (i.e. newsletters, television or radio outreach).

Robert “Raphael” Shore A member of Clarion Project’s board of directors.

Robert Spencer A prolific member of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Spencer runs the Jihad Watch web site and is also connected with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, and Stop Islamization of Nations.Spencer has referred to Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as a “con man. Someone who is knowing [sic] that what he is saying is false, but is fooling his followers.” In the same video he asserts, “From a historical standpoint, it is not even clear that Muhammad existed.”

Roger Ailes Ailes is the president and CEO of Fox News Channel. According to a source who spoke to Rolling Stone, “He has a personal paranoia about people who are Muslim — which is consistent with the ideology of his network.”

Ryan Mauro Mauro is a staff member at the Clarion Project.

Sam Kharoba Kharoba is the founder of the Counter Terrorism Operations Center. He claims to have trained “over 20,000 federal, state and local law enforcement officers. Kharoba has no formal academic degrees in Islamic studies and no experience in law enforcement. His only claim of any qualification is that he has a pre-university level certificate in Arabic culture, but Arabic culture is not Islam; in fact, only 20 percent of the world’s Muslims are Arabs. Upon review, it was found that large sections of Kharoba’s training manual were word-for-word identical to unreliable web-based sources. The investigation found his most common source was Wikipedia.

Scott Saunders Saunders is affilliated with the Virginia Beach, Va. chapter of Act for America.

Shalom Lewis Shalom Lewis is a cleric at the Congregation Etz Chaim synagogue in Marietta, Georgia. Etz Chaim’s website states Lewis “generates a caring warmth”, but his hateful speech about Islam is alarming and barbaric.

Stephanie Reis Reis is the Virginia State Director for Act for America. In 2010, as part of her welcome message for ACT’s Oklahoma chapter, Reis wrote, “The ideology, politics and religion of Islam has one purpose – to bring the world into submission to Islam and under its laws.”

Stephen Coughlin Now a fellow at the Center for Security Policy, Coughlin holds the beleif that belief that Islam “obligates Muslims to use violence in the name of spreading or defending the faith.”

Steven Crowder A Fox News Channel commentator, Crowder alleges “the real problem is the Quran.”

Steven Emerson The founder of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. Upon reviewing a book he wrote, the New York Times determined that Emerson has “an unfamiliarity with the Middle East and a pervasive anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian bias”.

Timothy Wildmon The president of the American Family Association, Wildmon has said, “[Islam] is, in fact, a religion of war, violence, intolerance, and physical persecution of non-Muslims.”

Tommy Robinson A member of the president’s council of Stop Islamization of America. Founder of the English Defence League (EDL), Robinson was jailed in 2013 for “having entered the United States illegally using someone else’s passport” and again in 2014 for mortgage fraud.

Tom Trento Trento is the founder and director of The United West. He believes mosques exist to wage a “cultural jihad” against America.

Usama Dakdok According to the web site of Dakdok’s Straight Way of Grace Ministry one of the group’s goals is to “expose Islam for what it is, and yes it is worse than a cancer, and this can be shown clearly in the reading of the Qur’an and theHadith.”

Wafa Sultan Sultan is connected to both Former Muslims United and Stop Islamization of Nations. She says, “I don`t see any difference between radical Islam and regular Islam…You cannot be American and Muslim at the same time.”

Walid Shoebat The founder of the Forum for Middle East Understanding, Shoebat is the author of “The case for Islamophobia,’ a book published in March 2013. Shoebat’s training and speaking events are promoted using his credentials and his “background” as a former PLO terrorist who converted to Christianity. In 2011, CNN researchers “found no evidence” to support Shoebat’s trademark claim of being a “former PLO terrorist.”

Former Lieutenant General William Boykin A board member of the Oak Initiative. Boykin asserts that “[Islam] should not be protected under the First Amendment,” that there should be “no mosques in America,” that Islam is a “totalitarian way of life,” and that there can be no interfaith dialogue or cooperation between Muslims and Christians.

Zuhdi Jasser Jasser is founder and president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a board member of the Clarion Project Under Jasser’s leadership, AIFD is embedded with groups that are dedicated to spreading false information, fear, and distrust of Islam and Muslims.

Palestinian Government Calls for War in Jerusalem
Calls for ‘day of rage’ against Israel on Friday as fears of intifada grow
October 30, 2014 BY: Adam Kredo

The Palestinian government has called on its “fighters” to launch a “day of rage” against Israel on Friday that will include armed attacks in Jerusalem, a move that has sparked fears that widespread riots could wreak havoc on the holy city.

Israeli authorities shut down access to Jerusalem’s Al Aqsa mosque late Wednesday following the shooting of a Jewish citizen by Palestinian terrorists.

Israel’s call to block access to the Temple Mount area of Jerusalem’s Old City—the first such closure since 1967—led the Palestinian government to call for armed resistance and accuse Israel of declaring war.

“Fatah calls to its fighters and to the masses of the Palestinian people to aid the Al-Aqsa Mosque and occupied Jerusalem,” the Palestinians’ main political party said in a statement published Thursday and translated by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW).

“The movement called to set tomorrow as a day of rage throughout the homeland and in countries which are home to refugees, to express the Palestinian people’s opposition to any attack on the holy places and foremost among them the Al-Aqsa Mosque,” the statement said. “Consider desecration of Al-Aqsa as a declaration of a religious war against the Palestinian people and the Arab Islamic nations.”

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas also escalated tensions on Thursday by accusing Israel of declaring war on the Palestinian people.

“This dangerous Israeli escalation is a declaration of war on the Palestinian people and its sacred places and on the Arab and Islamic nation,” Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeina quoted the leader as saying in comments made to the Palestinian Ma’an News Agency.

“We hold the Israeli government responsible for this dangerous escalation in Jerusalem that has reached its peak through the closure of the Al-Aqsa mosque this morning,” Abbas reportedly said.

The call for a new war on Israel comes just two months after Israel launched a major military operation in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip after terrorists stepped up rocket attacks on the Jewish state.

Middle East analysts expressed great concern about the situation and said that Abbas’s rhetoric could spark renewed violence in Jerusalem, a city that has experienced relative calm for quite some time.

“There is a very unique phenomena we’re observing right now, unlike anything we’ve seen before,” said Jonathan Schanzer, vice president of research for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD).

“There really does appear to be a movement that is trying to win hearts and minds and to get people riled up,” said Schanzer, explaining that Palestinian activists in the Temple Mount area are reportedly stoking tensions against Israel.

“Usually, the West Bank or Gaza set the tone for conflicts with Israel. This time, Jerusalem Arabs are leading the charge,” Schanzer explained.

Abbas’ comments accusing Israel of declaring war via its closure of the Temple Mount could make an already volatile situation even worse.

“Abbas is taking a potentially combustible situation and pouring gasoline on it,” Schanzer said.

While hostilities in Jerusalem have been simmering since the July killing of Palestinian teenager Mohammed Abu Khdeir—whose abduction came just days after the murder of three Israeli kids by Hamas—Wednesday’s attack on the Temple Mount appears to have sparked fears of a new intifada.

Al-Aqsa was sealed off by Israeli police following an attack on Jewish activist and Rabbi Yehuda Glick, who remains in critical condition.

The Palestinian government and its allies have used the closure to accuse Israel of trying to eradicate Muslim holy sites such as Al-Aqsa. Some officials have even called it a “conspiracy,” according to the Palestinian media.

Jordanian diplomat Hael Abd-el Hafiz Daud reportedly called the move “a dangerous escalation by the Israeli authorities and state terrorism that is unacceptable.”

“We cannot keep quiet about it,” Daud was reported to have said.

FDD’s Schanzer said that tensions are high going into Friday.

“We could be on the brink, but lets not declare war on behalf of the Palestinians,” he said.

The government-sanctioned calls for violence also come just days after tensions between the Israeli and U.S. administration reached historic new highs.

Obama administration officials were quoted as calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “chickenshit,” comments that roiled both governments and exposed a deep rift.

Noah Pollak, executive director of the pro-Israel Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI), said that the Obama administration is abetting Palestinian violence.

“What adds fuel to the fire is the Obama administration’s endless hostility to Israel and refusal to ever criticize the Palestinians for incitement and anti-Semitism,” Pollak said. “Mahmoud Abbas instigates violence; Obama responds by calling him a man of peace.”

Dempsey Explains Why US Didn’t Stop Islamic State Massacre of Tribe That Fought Back
October 30, 2014

Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the coalition fighting the Islamic State in Iraq did not prevent the massacre of 400 people from the Albu Nimr tribe in Iraq’s al Anbar province because the U.S. did not have adequate ground intelligence to be made aware of the impending massacre.

“The Iraqi Security Forces in al Anbar province are in defensive positions and would be unlikely to be able to respond to a request for assistance from the Albu Nimr tribe,” Dempsey said. “We could, with our airpower, if we had the proper ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) at the point when it was requested.”

Dempsey said he was not aware that the Albu Nimr tribe made a request for assistance from U.S. or Iraqi Security Forces. He did note, however, that the massacre underlines the need to expand the “train, advise, and assist” program into al Anbar province.

CNN reporter Jim Scuitto pointed out that members of the Albu Nimr tribe were risking their lives in a way that the anti-IS coalition was “desperate” for. Yet, they received no aid except for an airdrop of meals on Monday.

Dempsey said unlike the airstrikes that stopped a massacre of Yezidis on Mt. Sinjar, the Albu Nimr massacre was more difficult to prevent because Islamic State forces were “intermingled” with those of the tribe.

ISIS Has More Land, Money, and Fighters Than Al-Qaeda Had on 9/11
30 Oct 2014 by AWR Hawkins

The Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has more land, money, and fighters under its control than al-Qaeda had on September 11, 2001.

This was disclosed during discussions at a recent meeting between the Chicago area Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), American Armenian community members, Assyrian American leaders, and Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL), among others.

According to the Assyrian International News Agency, Senator Kirk told those gathered, “ISIS controls more money, fighters, and land than al-Qaeda did on 9/11 and is committing mass atrocities against women, children, and ethnic and religious minorities in the Middle East.” He added that the threat posed by ISIS is real not only in the Middle East, but also in America–including the Chicago area.

Kirk said, “Members of Chicago’s Assyrian-American community and Illinois’ Middle East expert community highlighted how these barbaric terrorists pose grave threats not just overseas, but right here in Chicago.”

Breitbart News has tracked and reported on ISIS’ nearly unchecked growth over the past few months–from the June 10 fall of Mosul to Obama’s September 10 announcement that the U.S. would follow tactics used in Yemen and Somalia in fighting ISIS to ISIS’ call for radicalized Americans to go to the homes of U.S. soldiers and “slaughter them” to ISIS’ October assault on the Kurdish community in Kobane, Syria.

Throughout this time, Breitbart News also reported ISIS’ mass execution of Iraqi soldiers (July) and the late-August execution of 250 Syrian soldiers.

Additionally, Breitbart News reported ISIS’ beheading of two American journalists–James Foley and Steven Sotloff. This was followed by Senator Mark Udall’s (D-CO) September assurances that ISIS is “[not] an immediate threat to the homeland.”

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at

Pigs, Lipstick and Islam

Islam How Dare Religion-of-Peace-
Radical Islam
Wake Up Islam Jihad Muslim

Related previous posts on this blog

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

VIDEO PM Netanyahu to MB Obama on “Chickens..t” Smear, “The Attack on Me Only Comes Because I’m Defending Israel”

Obama bicycle
October 29, 2014

“Because the attack on me only comes because I’m defending Israel.”

It’s as I said here – protecting and defending his people, his nation, is a principle that Obama does not adhere to. Just ask Ambassador Stevens …. and all the other victims of Obama’s anti-American policies. Couple that with Obama’s Jew-hatred and well, it’s a chickenshit scenario.

Bicycle man is calling this war hero chickenshit. Orwellian. While Obama was smoking doobies on vacay in Pakstian (!), Netanyahu was slaying dragons.


Obama’s “leading from behind” is the very definition of chickenshit.
Obama’s response and the redline on Syria’s chemical weapons is chickenshit.
Obama’s stand down on Benghazi, leaving our Ambassador and attaches to die, was chickenshit.
Obama not sending in back-up to our soldiers in Benghazi is chickenshit.
Obama damaging U.S. credibility is chickenshit.
Obama backing Hamas is chickenshit.
Obama condemning Jewish homes in Jerusalem is chickenshit.
Obama into signing a status of forces of agreement Iraq is chickenshit.
Obama claiming the Islamic State is not Islamic is chickenshit.
Obama not protecting the American people and restricting flights from West Africa is chickenshit.
Obama saying the future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam in the wake of jihad murders in Benghazi is chickenshit.
Obama publicly humiliating an ally who won’t submit to the demands of an enemy whose sole mission is to destroy Israel is chicken shit.

BIBI Netanyahu

Not to put to fine a point on it — but Atlas reader Genesha Akbar points out:

Netanyahu joined the Israel Defense Forces during the Six-Day War in 1967, and became a team leader in the Sayeret Matkal special forces unit. He took part in many missions, including Operation Inferno (1968), Operation Gift (1968) and Operation Isotope (1972), during which he was shot in the shoulder. He fought on the front lines in the War of Attrition and the Yom Kippur War in 1973, taking part in special forces raids along the Suez Canal, and then leading a commando assault deep into Syrian territory. In 1976 Netanyahu lost his older brother Yonatan Netanyahu. Yonatan was serving as the commander of Benjamin’s former unit, the Sayeret Matkal, and was killed in action during the counter-terrorism hostage-rescue mission Operation Entebbe in which his unit rescued more than 100 Israeli hostages hijacked by terrorists and flown to the Entebbe Airport in Uganda.

Netanyahu + Obama

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

VIDEO When Muslim Filmmaker in Canada Tries to Document “Islamophobia” in Hometown of Murdered Soldier Corporal Nathan Cirillo

Marcus Cirillo, 5, walks along the funeral procession for his father in Hamilton, Ontario on Tuesday
October 29, 2014

A Muslim filmmaker, Omar Albach, tried to produce a documentary on “islamophobia” as a jihad murder victim was about to be laid to rest, but his ruse got a punch in the nose — literally. The filmmaker was looking to capture a “gotcha” moment in the wake of not one but two bloody jihad attacks in as many days in Canada last week — but he was the one who got gotcha’ed.

The Muslim filmmaker went to Hamilton, the hometown of Corporal Cirillo and the emotional scene of his funeral procession, led by his five-year-old son Marco. Yes, the hometown of one of the victims of the jihad attacks. Tasteless, grotesque and savage, Omar Albach tried to film some anti-Muslim hatred as the funeral procession prepared to get underway. These ghouls did not get what they came for. Instead, he got punched in the face for being an islamophobe. lol.


Photo:Soldiers escort Kathy Cirillo during the funeral procession for her son Cpl. Nathan Cirillo in Hamilton


Prime Minister Steven Harper and wife at Corporal Nathan Cirillo’s funeral

Corporal Nathan Cirillo, 24, was one of two soldiers killed in a pair of attacks last week that police said were carried out independently by converts to Islam. While thousands of mourners packed a church and lined adjacent streets in industrial Hamilton, Ontario, on Tuesday for the funeral of the soldier shot dead in last week’s attack on the nation’s seat of government, this Muslim filmmaker tried to make it all about “islamophobia.” Victimizing the victim, that’s his jihad. No empathy, no humanity, just victimhood and supremacism.

Video: An emotional Prime Minister Harper speaks to Cpl. Cirillo’s son at funeral

The thing is — this is reality, and has been reality since 9/11. The West never wanted this war. And it’s islamophobic if we defend ourselves and are opposed to jihad. Absurd but true. But this video won’t make any difference. Because “islamophobia” and “backlash” have always been fictions, and were devised as attack mechanisms in the wake of a jihad attack, to deflect and distract from the ideology behind these brutal acts of violence and war.

He got more than he bargained for. The filmmaker is left bleeding after playing the role of Islamophobe in his “social experiment.”

What’s interesting is that the guy coming to the defense of the Muslim says that Canadians won’t react they way Americans did after 9/11, implying a spike on anti-Muslim crime. There was none. One or two random incidents in a country of 350 million does not a trend make.

CAIR muslim news

It’s a fiction. Islamic supremacists and terror-tied groups like CAIR work furiously to create myths and lies in order to “substantiate” their faked hate/islamophobia narrative. “Islamophobia” is a club that Islamic supremacists wield after every bloody jihadi attack.

More on sinister origins of the thought-crushing device, “Islamophobia”: The very word “Islamophobia” is a fictional construct, as journalist Claire Berlinski explains. “The neologism ‘Islamophobia’ did not simply emerge ex nihilo. It was invented, deliberately, by a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the International Institute for Islamic Thought, which is based in Northern Virginia….Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a former member of the IIIT who has renounced the group in disgust, was an eyewitness to the creation of the word. ‘This loathsome term,’ he writes, ‘is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’”

The term “racism” in the Daily Mail headline — yet again — is wrong. Islam is not a race.

This is what happens to racists in Canada… Filmmaker left bleeding after playing role of Islamophobe in ‘social experiment’

Three filmmakers contrived the scenario in Hamilton, Ontario
That’s the home town of murdered soldier Corporal Nathan Cirillo
There was no shortage of people willing to stand up to racism and bullying
Eventually the filmmaker playing part of the racist got punched in the face

By Damien Gayle for MailOnline, October 29, 2014

A video experiment has shown most urban Canadians will leap to the defence of a Muslim person singled out for abuse, even in the wake of the country’s recent Islamist terror attack.

One angry resident of Hamilton, Ontario, punched a man playing the part of an Islamophobe having a go at a man wearing Muslim-style clothing at a bus stop.

He was left bleeding from his nose for the part he played in what the YouTube filmmakers called a ‘social experiment’


This is what happens to racists in Ontario: After playing the part of an Islamophobe for a YouTube video ‘social experiment’ this man was left with a bloody nose after he was punched in the face by an angry Canadian

‘This is based on the events that happened in Ottawa,’ said YouTube filmmaker Omar Albach, referring to recent bloodshed in the Canadian capital.

‘We’re going to see if people feel safe to be around Muslims or people that look like Muslims.’

Within seconds of the filmmakers beginning their first charade – which involved a one telling another one wearing Muslim-style clothes he can’t board a bus – a middle-aged man objects to the apparent racism.



‘You can’t judge and stereotype people by their clothes': The scene as a middle-aged man in blue jeans and leather jacket, centre, defends the man in Muslim dress after he is accosted by the man on the right
No time for racism: The man was just one of many who stood up for the man dressed as a Muslim

The filmmakers repeat their play in several different locations, to get a range of responses. Although the footage is edited and not continuous, it seems they found difficulty finding anyone to go along with the racist behaviour.

Asked to think of the recent shooting of Corporal Nathan Cirillo at Canada’s national war memorial, a woman responds: ‘It was awful and tragic, but I don’t think that’s any reason to persecute some just because of what they’re wearing.’

The video, published yesterday, has already attracted nearly 200,000 views and a storm of comment. The location was poignant, Hamilton is the hometown of Corporal Cirillo and it was today the emotional scene of his funeral procession, led by his five-year-old son Marco.

Burnishing Canada’s credentials as a tolerant, multicultural nation, the video shows Canadians of a range of ethnicities and walks of life objecting to vocal racism and Islamophobia.

Finally, a hot-headed man in a baseball cap decides he’s had enough of the haranguing being dished out to the Muslim man.

He sneaks up next to the ‘racist’ and sucker punches him in the face.

Speaking to camera, the man who played the role of the racist concluded: ‘So err.. the social experiment had a negative ending to it but, you know what? It’s positive because he stood up for him and I appreciate that.

‘It’s good.’

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Calling Out the Climate Alarmists – Weather Channel Founder Blasts ‘Climate Change’

28 October, 2014 by Bill Muehlenberg

While the climate alarmists and their supporters in the mainstream media continue to dish up their doom and gloom scenarios, more sober voices are making it clear that this may be one of the biggest scams of our lifetime. It seems this alarmism has been as much about pushing agendas as it has been about anything else, and many are now calling it out.

The evidence seems to be contradicting what the sky-is-falling crowd have been telling us, and it may well be time to give this whole matter a rest. Various folks have recently been speaking out on this. So let me offer some of this expert opinion, beginning with one of the big names in the environmentalist movement, Patrick Moore.

He of course was a founder of Greenpeace in the early 70s, and a leading environmentalist. But he has since moved away from both the radical environmental movement in general, and the climate alarmists in particular. Three years ago he produced a book outlining his major shift on all this. See my review here.

He has been in Australia recently and he continues to try to speak some sense on these issues. One newspaper article says this in part:

“If you want to see rapid change, look at the end of the glaciation period when the climate suddenly changed into this interglacial period we’re in now. For most of the history of modern life, it has been much warmer,” he says. Dr Moore says a warmer planet would not disadvantage humans or most other species. Some might suffer, but only because they have evolved to cope with 2.5 million years of cold. Asked whether he is concerned that a rapid climate shift could trigger massive upheaval of the species we know, he says, “the real problem would be if it gets colder”.

And he says CO2 has been demonised as toxic when it is “without doubt the most important food for life on earth. If there wasn’t carbon dioxide in sufficient quantity in our atmosphere, it would be a dead planet. The optimum CO2 concentration for plant growth is about four times the current level, he says, and concentrations 20 times higher would not be considered harmful on submarines or spacecraft. “Global CO2 was at (that level) during the Cambrian explosion, when modern life emerged.

Moore is certainly not alone in his scepticism. Consider also John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, who believes the whole thing is a ‘lie':

In an open letter attacking the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, he wrote: “The ocean is not rising significantly. The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number. Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing). I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid.”

Mr Coleman said he based many of his views on the findings of the NIPCC, a non-governmental international body of scientists aimed at offering an ‘independent second opinion of the evidence reviewed by the IPCC.’ He added: “There is no significant man-made global warming at this time, there has been none in the past and there is no reason to fear any in the future. Efforts to prove the theory that carbon dioxide is a significant greenhouse gas and pollutant causing significant warming or weather effects have failed. There has been no warming over 18 years.”

A third voice has also slammed this alarmist campaign, labelling a massive fraud:

Climate alarmism is “the biggest fraud in the field of science” and the 97% consensus claim is nonsensical, Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Cunningham tells MRCTV in a preview of his presentation at the upcoming Heartland Institute climate conference, July 7-9. “Since about 2000, I looked farther and farther into it,” Col. Cunningham (USMC, Ret.) tells MRCTV in an exclusive interview. “I found that not one of the claims that the alarmists were making out there had any bearings, whatsoever. And, so, it was kind of a no-brainer to come to the conclusion.”

Cunningham rejects the notion of man-made climate, not only as fact – but also as even qualifying as an actual “theory”: “In the media, it was being called a theory. Obviously, they didn’t know what it means to be a theory,” says Cunningham who has a B.S. in Physics (with honors) from University of California at Los Angeles and an M.S., with distinction; Institute of Geophysics And Planetary Sciences, with completed work on Doctorate in physics with exception of thesis.

“If we go back to the warmist hypothesis – not a theory, but, a hypothesis- they’ve been saying from the very beginning that carbon dioxide levels are abnormally high, that higher levels of carbon dioxide are bad for humans, and they thought warmer temperatures are bad for our world, and they thought we were able to override natural forces to control the earth’s temperature. So, as I’ve looked into those, that’s the problem that I’ve found, because I didn’t find any of those to be correct – and, they certainly were not a theory, it was just their guess at what they wanted to see in the data they were looking at.”

And it appears that there are many others who agree with these three. Last year a survey found that a majority of scientists are sceptical about the climate warming scenario:

It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these sceptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus. Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem. The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists.

And, plenty of data can be provided here. A report which has just come out tells us that the US is enjoying its coolest year on record. And this is all part of a two decade trend:

Winter temperatures throughout the United States are in a 20-year cooling trend, defying alarmist global warming predictions and debunking claims that warmer winters are causing environmental catastrophe. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data, presented by the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, reveal this winter’s exceptionally cold winter was merely the continuation of a long-term cooling trend. The trend line for the past 20 years shows more than two degrees Fahrenheit of cooling in U.S. winter temperatures since 1995. The two decades of cooling temperatures defy alarmist assertions that global warming is causing warmer winters.

Sorry, but I cannot buy all the alarmist scare-mongering. I will stick with Moore when he says that a “powerful convergence of interests” is pushing this agenda, and we need to reject the anthropogenic line. He says, “Of course I believe in climate change. It’s been happening since the beginning of the Earth. But that doesn’t mean we’re causing it.”



Weather Channel Founder Blasts ‘Climate Change’
by Jake Hebert, Ph.D. *

John Coleman, award-winning meteorologist and co-founder of the Weather Channel, has long been an outspoken skeptic of man-made global warming. He recently claimed that the idea that humans are changing the climate via increasing concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is “nothing but a lie.”1 His remarks are just the latest salvo in this long-running debate.

Creation scientists have generally been quite cautious in their approach to this controversial issue, wanting to examine the data honestly and objectively. Creation meteorologist Michael Oard publicly stated that he thinks global warming might be occurring, although he suspects most of it is due to natural causes, rather than man-made causes.2

Likewise, retired ICR atmospheric scientist Larry Vardiman has studied this issue extensively, even going so far as to perform his own independent analysis of multiple climate data sets (something that few scientists—even those who are outspoken on this subject—have actually bothered to do). Although he considered himself a skeptic on this issue, Dr. Vardiman concluded that evidence for global warming does exist, at least for the recent past.3

But Dr. Vardiman noted the fact that both carbon dioxide and temperatures have been increasing does not automatically imply that higher temperatures are being caused by increased carbon dioxide. One should remember the rule that “correlation does not imply causation.” Indeed, if one examines the data carefully, in some cases the increase in temperature actually occurs before the corresponding increase in atmospheric CO2 that supposedly caused it.4 Nor do past temperature increases necessarily imply that such increases will continue.

The debate is not over whether or not increased atmospheric CO2, in the absence of other factors, would result in warmer global temperatures. It would, due to the fact that CO2 is a “greenhouse gas.” The issue is whether or not other factors would enhance or impede this warming trend. Due to these other factors, how sensitive is the climate to changes in CO2?

Despite predictions from climate computer models that past warming trends would continue, global average surface temperatures have not increased significantly since 1998. This fact has prompted Judith Curry, a climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, to argue that current climate models are “running ‘too hot'” and are overestimating the climate’s sensitivity to increased concentrations of carbon dioxide.5

Clouds are a significant source of uncertainty in these climate models, since it is not known whether they have a net cooling or heating effect. A better understanding of cloud behavior is an important step in gaining clarity on this issue, and there are good reasons to suspect that climate models are not taking into account all the factors that could be influencing cloud behavior.6

Christians should remember a few key points about this issue. First, much of the panic over climate change is tied to a denial of the biblical worldview. Despite suggestions that our climate is inherently unstable, precariously perched on a “tipping point,” the atmosphere of our home planet has been well-designed by our all-knowing Creator. Furthermore, the Genesis Flood, as the greatest climate-changing event in history, is the only truly convincing explanation for an ice age.7 And the Lord promised that He would never send another world-wide Flood, and that there would be relative stability to the seasons in the post-Flood world (Genesis 8:21-22). These considerations should mitigate climate change hysteria. In fact, it is worth noting that uniformitarian interpretations of chemical clues within ice cores have actually made a subtle contribution to climate alarmism.8

Finally, Christians need to be aware that this issue, like the creation-evolution controversy, has been highly politicized. We should all be wary of uncritically accepting doomsday predictions that may be agenda motivated.


1. Huston, W. T. Top Meteorologist: Climate Change ‘Nothing but a Lie’. Breitbart. Posted on October 23, 2014, accessed October 23, 2014.
2. Oard, M. 2010. The Great Global Warming Debate: The facts, the fiction, and the furor. DVD. Creation Ministries International.
3. Vardiman, L. 2007. Evidence for Global Warming. Acts & Facts. 36 (4).
4. Vardiman, L. 2008. Does Carbon Dioxide Drive Global Warming? Acts & Facts. 37 (10): 10.
5. Curry, J. The Global Warming Statistical Meltdown. The Wall Street Journal. Text reposted on Dr. Curry’s personal blog October 9, 2014, accessed October 22, 2014.
6. Hebert, J. 2013. Two possible mechanisms linking cosmic rays to weather and climate. Journal of Creation. 27 (2): 91-98.
7. Hebert, J. 2013. Was There an Ice Age? Acts & Facts. 42 (12): 20.
8. Oard, M. J. 2005. The Frozen Record. Santee, CA: Institute for Creation Research, 128.

* Dr. Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments